英国并购救济政策变化的战略意义

Q4 Social Sciences
Joel Bamford, Carlo Sushant Chari
{"title":"英国并购救济政策变化的战略意义","authors":"Joel Bamford, Carlo Sushant Chari","doi":"10.4337/clj.2023.02.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2022 saw significant changes to policy on merger remedies in the UK. This article examines what they mean for merger clearance strategy along four vectors of change: (i) clarification of the Competition and Markets Authority’s remedial powers and procedural constraints following recent judgments of the Competition Appeal Tribunal; (ii) the CMA’s increased focus on intangible assets when designing remedies; (iii) a revolution in Phase 2 remedies procedure via the first use of a mechanism to concede a substantial lessening of competition to the CMA; and (iv) a substantive evolution in Phase 1 undertakings with the acceptance of creative remedies despite the high threshold for undertakings in lieu of reference to Phase 2 being accepted by the CMA.","PeriodicalId":36415,"journal":{"name":"Competition Law Journal","volume":"177 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic implications of changes in UK merger remedy policy\",\"authors\":\"Joel Bamford, Carlo Sushant Chari\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/clj.2023.02.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2022 saw significant changes to policy on merger remedies in the UK. This article examines what they mean for merger clearance strategy along four vectors of change: (i) clarification of the Competition and Markets Authority’s remedial powers and procedural constraints following recent judgments of the Competition Appeal Tribunal; (ii) the CMA’s increased focus on intangible assets when designing remedies; (iii) a revolution in Phase 2 remedies procedure via the first use of a mechanism to concede a substantial lessening of competition to the CMA; and (iv) a substantive evolution in Phase 1 undertakings with the acceptance of creative remedies despite the high threshold for undertakings in lieu of reference to Phase 2 being accepted by the CMA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"177 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2023.02.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2023.02.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年,英国并购救济政策发生了重大变化。本文沿着四个变化向量考察了它们对合并许可战略的意义:(i)在竞争上诉法庭最近的判决之后,澄清了竞争和市场管理局的补救权力和程序限制;(ii) CMA在设计补救措施时更加关注无形资产;(iii)通过首次使用一种机制,承认CMA的竞争大幅减少,对第二阶段补救程序进行革命;以及(iv)第一阶段承诺的实质性演变,尽管承诺的高门槛代替参考第二阶段被CMA接受,但仍接受创造性补救措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic implications of changes in UK merger remedy policy
2022 saw significant changes to policy on merger remedies in the UK. This article examines what they mean for merger clearance strategy along four vectors of change: (i) clarification of the Competition and Markets Authority’s remedial powers and procedural constraints following recent judgments of the Competition Appeal Tribunal; (ii) the CMA’s increased focus on intangible assets when designing remedies; (iii) a revolution in Phase 2 remedies procedure via the first use of a mechanism to concede a substantial lessening of competition to the CMA; and (iv) a substantive evolution in Phase 1 undertakings with the acceptance of creative remedies despite the high threshold for undertakings in lieu of reference to Phase 2 being accepted by the CMA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Competition Law Journal
Competition Law Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信