喉切除术后咽皮瘘:荟萃分析中发现咽皮瘘的综述

Karthik Nagaraja Rao, Ripudaman Arora, Ambesh Singh, Prajwal Dange, Nitin M. Nagarkar
{"title":"喉切除术后咽皮瘘:荟萃分析中发现咽皮瘘的综述","authors":"Karthik Nagaraja Rao, Ripudaman Arora, Ambesh Singh, Prajwal Dange, Nitin M. Nagarkar","doi":"10.3390/ohbm4020011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective—The objective of this study was to systematically assess meta-analyses to determine the lacunae in the literature for PCF following laryngectomy. Methods—Bibliometric analysis were carried out on meta-analyses on PCF after total laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer in the PubMed database. Results—Twenty-four meta-analyses were considered eligible and chosen for analysis. Six meta-analyses (25%) focused on the risk factors for PCF in TL. Four meta-analyses (16.6%) focused on the role of the onlay flap. Four meta-analyses (16.6%) focused on the timing of feed initiation. Three meta-analyses (12.5%) focused on using a stapler for pharyngeal closure. Two meta-analyses focused on types of pharyngeal reconstruction. Other meta-analyses analyzed the use of salivary bypass tubes, the method of pharyngeal closure, organ preservation protocols on PCF, primary and secondary TEP, and the effect of non-surgical treatment on PCF. Conclusion—Despite plenty of published meta-analyses, there is a lack of scrutiny on certain critical aspects of PCF.","PeriodicalId":73883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of otorhinolaryngology, hearing and balance medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharyngocutaneous Fistula after Laryngectomy: An Umbrella Review to Uncover Lacunae in Meta-Analyses\",\"authors\":\"Karthik Nagaraja Rao, Ripudaman Arora, Ambesh Singh, Prajwal Dange, Nitin M. Nagarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ohbm4020011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective—The objective of this study was to systematically assess meta-analyses to determine the lacunae in the literature for PCF following laryngectomy. Methods—Bibliometric analysis were carried out on meta-analyses on PCF after total laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer in the PubMed database. Results—Twenty-four meta-analyses were considered eligible and chosen for analysis. Six meta-analyses (25%) focused on the risk factors for PCF in TL. Four meta-analyses (16.6%) focused on the role of the onlay flap. Four meta-analyses (16.6%) focused on the timing of feed initiation. Three meta-analyses (12.5%) focused on using a stapler for pharyngeal closure. Two meta-analyses focused on types of pharyngeal reconstruction. Other meta-analyses analyzed the use of salivary bypass tubes, the method of pharyngeal closure, organ preservation protocols on PCF, primary and secondary TEP, and the effect of non-surgical treatment on PCF. Conclusion—Despite plenty of published meta-analyses, there is a lack of scrutiny on certain critical aspects of PCF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of otorhinolaryngology, hearing and balance medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of otorhinolaryngology, hearing and balance medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ohbm4020011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of otorhinolaryngology, hearing and balance medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ohbm4020011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是系统地评估meta分析,以确定喉切除术后PCF的文献空白。方法:对PubMed数据库中喉癌全喉切除术后PCF的meta分析进行文献计量学分析。结果:24项荟萃分析被认为符合条件并被选择进行分析。6项荟萃分析(25%)关注TL中PCF的危险因素,4项荟萃分析(16.6%)关注贴壁皮瓣的作用。4项荟萃分析(16.6%)关注于起始喂养的时间。三项荟萃分析(12.5%)集中于使用吻合器进行咽闭合。两项荟萃分析集中于咽重建的类型。其他meta分析分析了唾液旁路管的使用、咽闭合方法、PCF的器官保存方案、原发性和继发性TEP以及非手术治疗对PCF的影响。结论:尽管发表了大量的荟萃分析,但缺乏对PCF某些关键方面的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharyngocutaneous Fistula after Laryngectomy: An Umbrella Review to Uncover Lacunae in Meta-Analyses
Objective—The objective of this study was to systematically assess meta-analyses to determine the lacunae in the literature for PCF following laryngectomy. Methods—Bibliometric analysis were carried out on meta-analyses on PCF after total laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer in the PubMed database. Results—Twenty-four meta-analyses were considered eligible and chosen for analysis. Six meta-analyses (25%) focused on the risk factors for PCF in TL. Four meta-analyses (16.6%) focused on the role of the onlay flap. Four meta-analyses (16.6%) focused on the timing of feed initiation. Three meta-analyses (12.5%) focused on using a stapler for pharyngeal closure. Two meta-analyses focused on types of pharyngeal reconstruction. Other meta-analyses analyzed the use of salivary bypass tubes, the method of pharyngeal closure, organ preservation protocols on PCF, primary and secondary TEP, and the effect of non-surgical treatment on PCF. Conclusion—Despite plenty of published meta-analyses, there is a lack of scrutiny on certain critical aspects of PCF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信