劳动鉴定和与工作有关的健康/疾病的因果关系:法院判决的文件分析

Patrícia Cantisani Schaffer Pires, Mayte Raya Amazarray
{"title":"劳动鉴定和与工作有关的健康/疾病的因果关系:法院判决的文件分析","authors":"Patrícia Cantisani Schaffer Pires, Mayte Raya Amazarray","doi":"10.5935/rpot/2023.1.23875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forensic psychology has been consolidating itself as a specialty in the legal field, including in the scope of labor law, with growing controversies about the mental illness of workers. This article is the result of a qualitative documentary research, which aimed to analyze judicial decisions related to mental disorders and their respective causal link in labor expertise in Brazil. We analyzed 59 decisions published on the website of the Regional Labor Court (TRT) of the Fourth Region between 2019 and 2020. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. A significant presence of occupational diseases and claims for moral and material damages was observed. For the establishment of the causal link/concause, identified in 59.32% of the cases, the relevance of expert evidence was verified. The participation of the psychologist in such procedures proved to be inexpressive compared to medical experts. Possibilities and limitations related to the psychologist's professional performance in labor expertise are discussed. Keywords: forensic psychology, worker's health, court decisions.","PeriodicalId":12373,"journal":{"name":"Fractal: Revista de Psicologia","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perícias Trabalhistas e Nexo Causal em Saúde/Doença Relacionada ao Trabalho: Análise Documental de Decisões Judiciais\",\"authors\":\"Patrícia Cantisani Schaffer Pires, Mayte Raya Amazarray\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/rpot/2023.1.23875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Forensic psychology has been consolidating itself as a specialty in the legal field, including in the scope of labor law, with growing controversies about the mental illness of workers. This article is the result of a qualitative documentary research, which aimed to analyze judicial decisions related to mental disorders and their respective causal link in labor expertise in Brazil. We analyzed 59 decisions published on the website of the Regional Labor Court (TRT) of the Fourth Region between 2019 and 2020. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. A significant presence of occupational diseases and claims for moral and material damages was observed. For the establishment of the causal link/concause, identified in 59.32% of the cases, the relevance of expert evidence was verified. The participation of the psychologist in such procedures proved to be inexpressive compared to medical experts. Possibilities and limitations related to the psychologist's professional performance in labor expertise are discussed. Keywords: forensic psychology, worker's health, court decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fractal: Revista de Psicologia\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fractal: Revista de Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/rpot/2023.1.23875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fractal: Revista de Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/rpot/2023.1.23875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着有关工人精神疾病的争议日益增多,法医心理学作为包括劳动法在内的法律领域的专业正在巩固自己的地位。本文是一项定性文献研究的结果,旨在分析巴西劳动专业知识中与精神障碍相关的司法判决及其各自的因果关系。我们分析了2019年至2020年第四大区地方劳动法院(TRT)网站上公布的59项判决。数据分析采用描述性统计和内容分析。观察到职业病和精神和物质损害索赔的大量存在。对于因果关系/结论的建立,在59.32%的案例中,专家证据的相关性得到了验证。与医学专家相比,心理学家参与这些程序被证明是缺乏表现力的。讨论了心理学家在劳动专业知识方面的专业表现的可能性和局限性。关键词:法医心理学,工人健康,法院判决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perícias Trabalhistas e Nexo Causal em Saúde/Doença Relacionada ao Trabalho: Análise Documental de Decisões Judiciais
Forensic psychology has been consolidating itself as a specialty in the legal field, including in the scope of labor law, with growing controversies about the mental illness of workers. This article is the result of a qualitative documentary research, which aimed to analyze judicial decisions related to mental disorders and their respective causal link in labor expertise in Brazil. We analyzed 59 decisions published on the website of the Regional Labor Court (TRT) of the Fourth Region between 2019 and 2020. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. A significant presence of occupational diseases and claims for moral and material damages was observed. For the establishment of the causal link/concause, identified in 59.32% of the cases, the relevance of expert evidence was verified. The participation of the psychologist in such procedures proved to be inexpressive compared to medical experts. Possibilities and limitations related to the psychologist's professional performance in labor expertise are discussed. Keywords: forensic psychology, worker's health, court decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信