单路与多路微型经皮肾镜取石术治疗单侧肾结石:一项倾向匹配研究

Yeci Lei, Shangwen Dou, Gaoyuanzhi Yue, Huacai Zhu, Bangfeng Liu, Yongda Liu
{"title":"单路与多路微型经皮肾镜取石术治疗单侧肾结石:一项倾向匹配研究","authors":"Yeci Lei, Shangwen Dou, Gaoyuanzhi Yue, Huacai Zhu, Bangfeng Liu, Yongda Liu","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2663590/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) is recommended for renal stones in a solitary kidney due to its high stone-free rate (SFR), with acceptable complications. Aimed to compare the effectiveness and the safety of single-tract mPNL (SM) and multi-tract mPNL (MM) in these patients. Methods: 176 patients with a solitary kidney who had undergone SM or MM from January 2013 to December 2020 had been retrospectivelyevaluated. The MM group had tractsranged from 2 to 3. Patient clinical characteristics and demographic information were used for propensity score matching (PSM). Both groups' perioperative outcomes, procedure numbers, and efficacy quotient (EQ) were evaluated. As a more objective indicator for stone removal, EQ was calculated by SFR, retreatment rate, and auxiliary procedure rate. Results: The retreatment rate of the SM group was higher than the MM group (45.2% vs 21.4%, P =0.031). No statistical difference between the two groups in complication rate. The initial SFR of the MM group was significantly higher than that of the SM group in a subgroup with a cumulative stone diameter (CSD) range of 40-70 mm (58.8%vs15.4%, P =0.026). The MM group had a significantly lower retreatment rate than SM (23.5% vs 69.2%, P =0.025), showinga higher EQ (56.5% vs 34.8%) and fewer procedures (1.35±0.49 vs 1.77±0.44, P =0.023). Conclusions: In the CSD 40-70mm subgroups,MM proved better EQ with an acceptable complication rate and fewer procedures. When the CSD ranges from 40-70mm, MM can be used as a preferred procedure for renal stones in a solitary kidney. Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered and approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affilated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University(2020 No.K-41)","PeriodicalId":500086,"journal":{"name":"Research Square (Research Square)","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-versus multi-tract mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones in a solitary kidney: a propensity-matched study\",\"authors\":\"Yeci Lei, Shangwen Dou, Gaoyuanzhi Yue, Huacai Zhu, Bangfeng Liu, Yongda Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2663590/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) is recommended for renal stones in a solitary kidney due to its high stone-free rate (SFR), with acceptable complications. Aimed to compare the effectiveness and the safety of single-tract mPNL (SM) and multi-tract mPNL (MM) in these patients. Methods: 176 patients with a solitary kidney who had undergone SM or MM from January 2013 to December 2020 had been retrospectivelyevaluated. The MM group had tractsranged from 2 to 3. Patient clinical characteristics and demographic information were used for propensity score matching (PSM). Both groups' perioperative outcomes, procedure numbers, and efficacy quotient (EQ) were evaluated. As a more objective indicator for stone removal, EQ was calculated by SFR, retreatment rate, and auxiliary procedure rate. Results: The retreatment rate of the SM group was higher than the MM group (45.2% vs 21.4%, P =0.031). No statistical difference between the two groups in complication rate. The initial SFR of the MM group was significantly higher than that of the SM group in a subgroup with a cumulative stone diameter (CSD) range of 40-70 mm (58.8%vs15.4%, P =0.026). The MM group had a significantly lower retreatment rate than SM (23.5% vs 69.2%, P =0.025), showinga higher EQ (56.5% vs 34.8%) and fewer procedures (1.35±0.49 vs 1.77±0.44, P =0.023). Conclusions: In the CSD 40-70mm subgroups,MM proved better EQ with an acceptable complication rate and fewer procedures. When the CSD ranges from 40-70mm, MM can be used as a preferred procedure for renal stones in a solitary kidney. Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered and approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affilated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University(2020 No.K-41)\",\"PeriodicalId\":500086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Square (Research Square)\",\"volume\":\"221 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Square (Research Square)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2663590/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square (Research Square)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2663590/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小型经皮肾镜取石术(mPNL)因其结石清除率(SFR)高,并发症可接受,被推荐用于单侧肾结石的治疗。目的比较单路mPNL (SM)和多路mPNL (MM)治疗这些患者的有效性和安全性。方法:对2013年1月至2020年12月期间接受SM或MM治疗的176例孤立肾患者进行回顾性评估。MM组有2 ~ 3条肠道。使用患者临床特征和人口统计学信息进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)。评估两组围手术期疗效、手术次数及疗效商(EQ)。EQ是比较客观的结石去除指标,通过SFR、再处理率和辅助手术率来计算。结果:SM组复治率高于MM组(45.2% vs 21.4%, P =0.031)。两组并发症发生率无统计学差异。在累积结石直径(CSD)范围为40 ~ 70 MM的亚组中,MM组的初始SFR显著高于SM组(58.8%vs15.4%, P =0.026)。MM组再治疗率明显低于SM组(23.5% vs 69.2%, P =0.025), EQ (56.5% vs 34.8%)较高,手术次数较少(1.35±0.49 vs 1.77±0.44,P =0.023)。结论:在CSD 40-70mm亚组中,MM证明了更好的EQ,可接受的并发症发生率和较少的手术。当CSD范围在40-70mm之间时,MM可作为单肾肾结石的首选手术。试验注册:本研究回顾性注册并经广州医科大学第一附属医院伦理委员会批准(2020 No.K-41)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-versus multi-tract mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones in a solitary kidney: a propensity-matched study
Abstract Background: Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) is recommended for renal stones in a solitary kidney due to its high stone-free rate (SFR), with acceptable complications. Aimed to compare the effectiveness and the safety of single-tract mPNL (SM) and multi-tract mPNL (MM) in these patients. Methods: 176 patients with a solitary kidney who had undergone SM or MM from January 2013 to December 2020 had been retrospectivelyevaluated. The MM group had tractsranged from 2 to 3. Patient clinical characteristics and demographic information were used for propensity score matching (PSM). Both groups' perioperative outcomes, procedure numbers, and efficacy quotient (EQ) were evaluated. As a more objective indicator for stone removal, EQ was calculated by SFR, retreatment rate, and auxiliary procedure rate. Results: The retreatment rate of the SM group was higher than the MM group (45.2% vs 21.4%, P =0.031). No statistical difference between the two groups in complication rate. The initial SFR of the MM group was significantly higher than that of the SM group in a subgroup with a cumulative stone diameter (CSD) range of 40-70 mm (58.8%vs15.4%, P =0.026). The MM group had a significantly lower retreatment rate than SM (23.5% vs 69.2%, P =0.025), showinga higher EQ (56.5% vs 34.8%) and fewer procedures (1.35±0.49 vs 1.77±0.44, P =0.023). Conclusions: In the CSD 40-70mm subgroups,MM proved better EQ with an acceptable complication rate and fewer procedures. When the CSD ranges from 40-70mm, MM can be used as a preferred procedure for renal stones in a solitary kidney. Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered and approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affilated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University(2020 No.K-41)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信