印度和英国烟草控制比较研究:行政政策分析

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fatemeh Kokabisaghi, Mark Tonino, Seyed saeed Tabatabaee, Mohammad Khammarnia
{"title":"印度和英国烟草控制比较研究:行政政策分析","authors":"Fatemeh Kokabisaghi, Mark Tonino, Seyed saeed Tabatabaee, Mohammad Khammarnia","doi":"10.5812/healthscope-137603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: In recent decades, the tobacco epidemic has spread worldwide. The impact of tobacco control policies has been different among countries. This paper aims to explain how two countries, the United Kingdom (UK) and India, with different political, social, and cultural contexts, implemented the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Evidence Acquisition: A comparative study was done for tobacco control in UK and India in 2022. In a review of literature in five databases, observational data and legal documents on tobacco use were undertaken. To identify and explain the factors that pose challenges to the implementation of tobacco control policies, country reports and health policy monitoring and research databases (in total, 27 papers and 16 reports) were reviewed. Results: Having different economic, social, and cultural backgrounds, a similar pathway to control the tobacco industry can be seen in UK and India. At different stages of tobacco control, various interest groups with different routes of political influence used veto opportunities to overturn political decisions in the policy process. The factors that can explain the similar outcomes in UK and India are the global pressure of WHO, increased awareness of people and policymakers, and a sense of urgency about the tobacco problem in both societies. Conclusions: At different stages of tobacco control in both countries, various interest groups with different routes of political influence used veto opportunities to overturn political decisions in the policy process. Continuous analysis of interest groups and their status quo is necessary to restrict the tobacco industry in favor of public health. Governments should carefully recognize the stakeholders and stake challengers in the policy domain and balance their interests.","PeriodicalId":12857,"journal":{"name":"Health Scope","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study on Tobacco Control in India and the United Kingdom: Analysis of Executive Policies\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Kokabisaghi, Mark Tonino, Seyed saeed Tabatabaee, Mohammad Khammarnia\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/healthscope-137603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: In recent decades, the tobacco epidemic has spread worldwide. The impact of tobacco control policies has been different among countries. This paper aims to explain how two countries, the United Kingdom (UK) and India, with different political, social, and cultural contexts, implemented the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Evidence Acquisition: A comparative study was done for tobacco control in UK and India in 2022. In a review of literature in five databases, observational data and legal documents on tobacco use were undertaken. To identify and explain the factors that pose challenges to the implementation of tobacco control policies, country reports and health policy monitoring and research databases (in total, 27 papers and 16 reports) were reviewed. Results: Having different economic, social, and cultural backgrounds, a similar pathway to control the tobacco industry can be seen in UK and India. At different stages of tobacco control, various interest groups with different routes of political influence used veto opportunities to overturn political decisions in the policy process. The factors that can explain the similar outcomes in UK and India are the global pressure of WHO, increased awareness of people and policymakers, and a sense of urgency about the tobacco problem in both societies. Conclusions: At different stages of tobacco control in both countries, various interest groups with different routes of political influence used veto opportunities to overturn political decisions in the policy process. Continuous analysis of interest groups and their status quo is necessary to restrict the tobacco industry in favor of public health. Governments should carefully recognize the stakeholders and stake challengers in the policy domain and balance their interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Scope\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Scope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/healthscope-137603\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Scope","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/healthscope-137603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近几十年来,烟草流行在世界范围内蔓延。各国烟草控制政策的影响各不相同。本文旨在解释两个国家,英国(英国)和印度,具有不同的政治,社会和文化背景,如何实施世界卫生组织(世卫组织)烟草控制框架公约。证据获取:对2022年英国和印度的烟草控制进行了比较研究。在对五个数据库中的文献进行审查时,采用了关于烟草使用的观察性数据和法律文件。为了查明和解释对烟草管制政策的执行构成挑战的因素,审查了国家报告和卫生政策监测和研究数据库(总共27篇论文和16份报告)。结果:由于经济、社会和文化背景不同,在英国和印度可以看到类似的控制烟草业的途径。在烟草控制的不同阶段,具有不同政治影响途径的各种利益集团利用否决权的机会推翻政策过程中的政治决定。可以解释英国和印度类似结果的因素是世卫组织的全球压力,民众和政策制定者意识的提高,以及两国社会对烟草问题的紧迫感。结论:在两国烟草控制的不同阶段,具有不同政治影响途径的各种利益集团利用否决机会推翻政策过程中的政治决策。对利益集团及其现状的持续分析对于限制烟草业有利于公众健康是必要的。政府应认真认识政策领域的利益相关者和利益挑战者,并平衡他们的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study on Tobacco Control in India and the United Kingdom: Analysis of Executive Policies
Context: In recent decades, the tobacco epidemic has spread worldwide. The impact of tobacco control policies has been different among countries. This paper aims to explain how two countries, the United Kingdom (UK) and India, with different political, social, and cultural contexts, implemented the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Evidence Acquisition: A comparative study was done for tobacco control in UK and India in 2022. In a review of literature in five databases, observational data and legal documents on tobacco use were undertaken. To identify and explain the factors that pose challenges to the implementation of tobacco control policies, country reports and health policy monitoring and research databases (in total, 27 papers and 16 reports) were reviewed. Results: Having different economic, social, and cultural backgrounds, a similar pathway to control the tobacco industry can be seen in UK and India. At different stages of tobacco control, various interest groups with different routes of political influence used veto opportunities to overturn political decisions in the policy process. The factors that can explain the similar outcomes in UK and India are the global pressure of WHO, increased awareness of people and policymakers, and a sense of urgency about the tobacco problem in both societies. Conclusions: At different stages of tobacco control in both countries, various interest groups with different routes of political influence used veto opportunities to overturn political decisions in the policy process. Continuous analysis of interest groups and their status quo is necessary to restrict the tobacco industry in favor of public health. Governments should carefully recognize the stakeholders and stake challengers in the policy domain and balance their interests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Scope
Health Scope PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信