敌对环境下的生存能力设计

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Tojin Eapen, Daniel Finkenstadt
{"title":"敌对环境下的生存能力设计","authors":"Tojin Eapen, Daniel Finkenstadt","doi":"10.4013/sdrj.2022.153.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper introduces a novel ERP model of survivability design using natural analogies. Management theories frequently emerge from biological metaphors. Every entity seeks to continue existence, to survive. Firms, governments and individuals balance survivability factors of efficiency, resilience, and prominence (ERP) to stay alive. The researchers employ a comparative analysis methodology between squids, military ships, startup firms in the defense industry and strategic supply chains using these analogies and novel ERP model as an analytical framework. Comparing the cases yields general principles of strategic design that potentially extend to other entities that function in hostile environments. These principles primarily relate to the relative significance of threats, the importance of ERP factors, the nature of interrelationships among the ERP factors, and the tradeoffs involved while taking actions to improve survivability. The paper offers insights into the use of ERP analogical case analysis as a means for interdependent entities to co-create strategies to plan for and overcome dilemmas in hostile environments.","PeriodicalId":52184,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Design Research Journal","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survivability Design in Hostile Environments\",\"authors\":\"Tojin Eapen, Daniel Finkenstadt\",\"doi\":\"10.4013/sdrj.2022.153.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper introduces a novel ERP model of survivability design using natural analogies. Management theories frequently emerge from biological metaphors. Every entity seeks to continue existence, to survive. Firms, governments and individuals balance survivability factors of efficiency, resilience, and prominence (ERP) to stay alive. The researchers employ a comparative analysis methodology between squids, military ships, startup firms in the defense industry and strategic supply chains using these analogies and novel ERP model as an analytical framework. Comparing the cases yields general principles of strategic design that potentially extend to other entities that function in hostile environments. These principles primarily relate to the relative significance of threats, the importance of ERP factors, the nature of interrelationships among the ERP factors, and the tradeoffs involved while taking actions to improve survivability. The paper offers insights into the use of ERP analogical case analysis as a means for interdependent entities to co-create strategies to plan for and overcome dilemmas in hostile environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategic Design Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategic Design Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2022.153.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Design Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2022.153.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一种基于自然类比的生存能力设计ERP模型。管理理论经常来源于生物隐喻。每个实体都在寻求继续存在,生存下去。企业、政府和个人平衡效率、弹性和突出性(ERP)的生存因素以保持活力。研究人员在鱿鱼、军舰、国防工业初创公司和战略供应链之间采用了一种比较分析方法,使用这些类比和新颖的ERP模型作为分析框架。比较这些案例可以得出战略设计的一般原则,这些原则可能延伸到在敌对环境中发挥作用的其他实体。这些原则主要涉及威胁的相对重要性,ERP因素的重要性,ERP因素之间相互关系的性质,以及在采取行动以提高生存能力时所涉及的权衡。本文提供了使用ERP类比案例分析的见解,作为相互依赖的实体共同创造战略的手段,以计划和克服敌对环境中的困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survivability Design in Hostile Environments
This paper introduces a novel ERP model of survivability design using natural analogies. Management theories frequently emerge from biological metaphors. Every entity seeks to continue existence, to survive. Firms, governments and individuals balance survivability factors of efficiency, resilience, and prominence (ERP) to stay alive. The researchers employ a comparative analysis methodology between squids, military ships, startup firms in the defense industry and strategic supply chains using these analogies and novel ERP model as an analytical framework. Comparing the cases yields general principles of strategic design that potentially extend to other entities that function in hostile environments. These principles primarily relate to the relative significance of threats, the importance of ERP factors, the nature of interrelationships among the ERP factors, and the tradeoffs involved while taking actions to improve survivability. The paper offers insights into the use of ERP analogical case analysis as a means for interdependent entities to co-create strategies to plan for and overcome dilemmas in hostile environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strategic Design Research Journal
Strategic Design Research Journal Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信