{"title":"揭秘美国的“伊朗迷思”:如何避免,如何解决德黑兰难题?","authors":"Arshid Iqbal Dar, Irfan UL Haq","doi":"10.1177/09763996231195682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores United States’ Iran policy, especially the current debate over the revival of Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) that has gained momentum ever since Joe Biden became the new US president. Despite Biden’s initial desire to restore the nuclear deal, the trajectory so far has been that of a roller-coaster ride. The parties are yet to reach an agreement. While exploring why, this article argues that the United States has been entrapped into an intractable rivalry with Iran. In fact, many neoconservative academic and policymaking Iran hawks falsely portray Tehran as pursuing ‘regional hegemony’ and bringing back the dangerous ‘Persian Empire’ to encourage and favour a harsh policy towards Iran. Besides, the United States allies such as Israel and Saudi Arabia also lured Washington to pursue aggressive policy towards Iran. However, as this article demonstrates these false narratives and myths while hurting the United States’ national interest blinds Washington to possible areas of mutual interest with Iran. The trajectory of JCPOA underscores this. Therefore, it is very crucial to scrutinize the ‘Iran myth/s’ and offer valuable lessons to the United States as to how not, and how to fix the Iran conundrum.","PeriodicalId":41791,"journal":{"name":"Millennial Asia","volume":"38 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demystifying United States’ ‘Iran Myth/s’: How Not, and How to Fix the Tehran Conundrum?\",\"authors\":\"Arshid Iqbal Dar, Irfan UL Haq\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09763996231195682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores United States’ Iran policy, especially the current debate over the revival of Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) that has gained momentum ever since Joe Biden became the new US president. Despite Biden’s initial desire to restore the nuclear deal, the trajectory so far has been that of a roller-coaster ride. The parties are yet to reach an agreement. While exploring why, this article argues that the United States has been entrapped into an intractable rivalry with Iran. In fact, many neoconservative academic and policymaking Iran hawks falsely portray Tehran as pursuing ‘regional hegemony’ and bringing back the dangerous ‘Persian Empire’ to encourage and favour a harsh policy towards Iran. Besides, the United States allies such as Israel and Saudi Arabia also lured Washington to pursue aggressive policy towards Iran. However, as this article demonstrates these false narratives and myths while hurting the United States’ national interest blinds Washington to possible areas of mutual interest with Iran. The trajectory of JCPOA underscores this. Therefore, it is very crucial to scrutinize the ‘Iran myth/s’ and offer valuable lessons to the United States as to how not, and how to fix the Iran conundrum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Millennial Asia\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Millennial Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996231195682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millennial Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996231195682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Demystifying United States’ ‘Iran Myth/s’: How Not, and How to Fix the Tehran Conundrum?
This article explores United States’ Iran policy, especially the current debate over the revival of Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) that has gained momentum ever since Joe Biden became the new US president. Despite Biden’s initial desire to restore the nuclear deal, the trajectory so far has been that of a roller-coaster ride. The parties are yet to reach an agreement. While exploring why, this article argues that the United States has been entrapped into an intractable rivalry with Iran. In fact, many neoconservative academic and policymaking Iran hawks falsely portray Tehran as pursuing ‘regional hegemony’ and bringing back the dangerous ‘Persian Empire’ to encourage and favour a harsh policy towards Iran. Besides, the United States allies such as Israel and Saudi Arabia also lured Washington to pursue aggressive policy towards Iran. However, as this article demonstrates these false narratives and myths while hurting the United States’ national interest blinds Washington to possible areas of mutual interest with Iran. The trajectory of JCPOA underscores this. Therefore, it is very crucial to scrutinize the ‘Iran myth/s’ and offer valuable lessons to the United States as to how not, and how to fix the Iran conundrum.
期刊介绍:
Millennial Asia: An International Journal of Asian Studies is a multidisciplinary, refereed biannual journal of the Association of Asia Scholars (AAS)–an association of the alumni of the Asian Scholarship Foundation (ASF). It aims to encourage multifaceted, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research on Asia, in order to understand its fast changing context as a growth pole of global economy. By providing a forum for Asian scholars situated globally, it promotes dialogue between the global academic community, civil society and policy makers on Asian issues. The journal examines Asia on a regional and comparative basis, emphasizing patterns and tendencies that go beyond national borders and are globally relevant. Modern and contemporary Asia has witnessed dynamic transformations in cultures, societies, economies and political institutions, among others. It confronts issues of collective identity formation, ecological crisis, rapid economic change and resurgence of religion and communal identifies while embracing globalization. An analysis of past experiences can help produce a deeper understanding of contemporary change. In particular, the journal is interested in locating contemporary changes within a historical perspective, through the use of interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary approaches. This way, it hopes to promote comparative studies involving Asia’s various regions. The journal brings out both thematic and general issues and the thrust areas are: Asian integration, Asian economies, sociology, culture, politics, governance, security, development issues, arts and literature and any other such issue as the editorial board may deem fit. The core fields include development encompassing agriculture, industry, regional trade, social sectors like health and education and development policy across the region and in specific countries in a comparative perspective.