工作场所的优势使用:一项荟萃分析

IF 0.8 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Journal of Psychology in Africa Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1080/14330237.2023.2246274

Yuxiang Luan, Guolong Zhao, Liang Xu, Bo Ren

{"title":"工作场所的优势使用:一项荟萃分析","authors":"Yuxiang Luan, Guolong Zhao, Liang Xu, Bo Ren","doi":"10.1080/14330237.2023.2246274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis meta-analysis aimed to clarify the relationship between perceived organisational support and core self-evaluations and strengths use and task performance outcomes utilising a cross-temporal versus time-lagged research design. Drawing on the random effects model, this study combined 44 effect sizes from 23 independent studies (including 8 313 samples). The results indicated that strengths use is positively related to core self-evaluations (CSE) (ρ = 0.40) and perceived organisational support for strengths use (POSSU) (ρ = 0.47), task performance (ρ = 0.45), organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) (ρ = 0.37), positive affect (ρ = 0.51), work engagement (ρ = 0.53), and self-efficacy (ρ = 0) organisational design (cross-temporal versus time-lagged) does not significantly moderate the relationships of interest. The findings imply that utilising the strengths of employees is essential for effective human resource management and employees’ career development.Keywords: strengths usemeta-analysisantecedentsoutcomesworkplacetask performance","PeriodicalId":46959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychology in Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengths use in the workplace: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yuxiang Luan, Guolong Zhao, Liang Xu, Bo Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14330237.2023.2246274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThis meta-analysis aimed to clarify the relationship between perceived organisational support and core self-evaluations and strengths use and task performance outcomes utilising a cross-temporal versus time-lagged research design. Drawing on the random effects model, this study combined 44 effect sizes from 23 independent studies (including 8 313 samples). The results indicated that strengths use is positively related to core self-evaluations (CSE) (ρ = 0.40) and perceived organisational support for strengths use (POSSU) (ρ = 0.47), task performance (ρ = 0.45), organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) (ρ = 0.37), positive affect (ρ = 0.51), work engagement (ρ = 0.53), and self-efficacy (ρ = 0) organisational design (cross-temporal versus time-lagged) does not significantly moderate the relationships of interest. The findings imply that utilising the strengths of employees is essential for effective human resource management and employees’ career development.Keywords: strengths usemeta-analysisantecedentsoutcomesworkplacetask performance\",\"PeriodicalId\":46959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychology in Africa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychology in Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2023.2246274\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychology in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2023.2246274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本荟萃分析旨在利用跨时间与时间滞后的研究设计，阐明感知组织支持与核心自我评价、优势使用和任务绩效结果之间的关系。本研究采用随机效应模型，综合了23项独立研究的44个效应量(包括8 313个样本)。结果表明，优势使用与核心自我评价(CSE) (ρ = 0.40)正相关，与优势使用的感知组织支持(POSSU) (ρ = 0.47)、任务绩效(ρ = 0.45)、组织公民行为(OCB) (ρ = 0.37)、积极情感(ρ = 0.51)、工作投入(ρ = 0.53)和自我效能感(ρ = 0)正相关。组织设计(跨时间与时滞)对兴趣关系无显著调节作用。研究结果表明，利用员工的优势对有效的人力资源管理和员工的职业发展至关重要。关键词:优势使用meta分析前因结果工作场所任务绩效

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Strengths use in the workplace: A meta-analysis

AbstractThis meta-analysis aimed to clarify the relationship between perceived organisational support and core self-evaluations and strengths use and task performance outcomes utilising a cross-temporal versus time-lagged research design. Drawing on the random effects model, this study combined 44 effect sizes from 23 independent studies (including 8 313 samples). The results indicated that strengths use is positively related to core self-evaluations (CSE) (ρ = 0.40) and perceived organisational support for strengths use (POSSU) (ρ = 0.47), task performance (ρ = 0.45), organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) (ρ = 0.37), positive affect (ρ = 0.51), work engagement (ρ = 0.53), and self-efficacy (ρ = 0) organisational design (cross-temporal versus time-lagged) does not significantly moderate the relationships of interest. The findings imply that utilising the strengths of employees is essential for effective human resource management and employees’ career development.Keywords: strengths usemeta-analysisantecedentsoutcomesworkplacetask performance

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Psychology in Africa PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Findings from psychological research in Africa and related regions needs a forum for better dissemination and utilisation in the context of development. Special emphasis is placed on the consideration of African, African-American, Asian, Caribbean, and Hispanic-Latino realities and problems. Contributions should attempt a synthesis of emic and etic methodologies and applications. The Journal of Psychology in Africa includes original articles, review articles, book reviews, commentaries, special issues, case analyses, reports and announcements.