《儿童法》对坦桑尼亚无遗嘱习惯法规则的法律影响

Fatuma Adam Mgomba
{"title":"《儿童法》对坦桑尼亚无遗嘱习惯法规则的法律影响","authors":"Fatuma Adam Mgomba","doi":"10.37284/eajle.6.1.1541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores legal implications of Child Act, 2009 concurrently with the intestate rules of customary law in Tanzania (to be on referred as intestate rules). From the discussion it is evident that little study has been done on this area of law since the colonial masters left 60 years ago. The main issue that this paper identifies is the inequality in provisions of the intestate succession laws, which is contrary to the provisions of equality, brought about by the Law of Child Act dispensation. The article also seeks to unearth contradictory application of the intestate rules of customary law in Tanzania. Reference is made to the leading judicial decisions which directly affects and alters the intestate rules. This is followed by a brief discussion of unequal intestate rules and judicial decisions. The inroads to be made in order to improve children right to parental property in this field of intestate rules are suggested including reform in this area of law. This study is limited to the applicability of codified intestate rules from patrilineal societies as provided under the Local Customary Law Declaration Order (NO. 4), GN 346/1963(to be referred as GN 436/63 to be referred as GN 436)","PeriodicalId":472874,"journal":{"name":"East African journal of law and ethics","volume":"52 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Implications of the Law of Child Act on the Intestate Rules of Customary Law in Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Fatuma Adam Mgomba\",\"doi\":\"10.37284/eajle.6.1.1541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores legal implications of Child Act, 2009 concurrently with the intestate rules of customary law in Tanzania (to be on referred as intestate rules). From the discussion it is evident that little study has been done on this area of law since the colonial masters left 60 years ago. The main issue that this paper identifies is the inequality in provisions of the intestate succession laws, which is contrary to the provisions of equality, brought about by the Law of Child Act dispensation. The article also seeks to unearth contradictory application of the intestate rules of customary law in Tanzania. Reference is made to the leading judicial decisions which directly affects and alters the intestate rules. This is followed by a brief discussion of unequal intestate rules and judicial decisions. The inroads to be made in order to improve children right to parental property in this field of intestate rules are suggested including reform in this area of law. This study is limited to the applicability of codified intestate rules from patrilineal societies as provided under the Local Customary Law Declaration Order (NO. 4), GN 346/1963(to be referred as GN 436/63 to be referred as GN 436)\",\"PeriodicalId\":472874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East African journal of law and ethics\",\"volume\":\"52 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East African journal of law and ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37284/eajle.6.1.1541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African journal of law and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37284/eajle.6.1.1541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了2009年《儿童法》与坦桑尼亚习惯法的无遗嘱规则(以下简称无遗嘱规则)的法律含义。从讨论中可以明显看出,自殖民统治者60年前离开以来,对这一法律领域的研究很少。本文认定的主要问题是《儿童法》的豁免所带来的无遗嘱继承法规定的不平等,与平等的规定相违背。本文还试图揭示坦桑尼亚习惯法中无遗嘱规则的矛盾适用。参考了直接影响和改变无遗嘱规则的主要司法判决。接下来是对不平等的无遗嘱规则和司法判决的简短讨论。建议在这一无遗嘱规则领域改进子女对父母财产的权利,包括在这一法律领域进行改革。本研究仅限于适用于《本地习惯法声明令》(第19号)所规定的父系社会编纂的无遗嘱规则。GN 346/1963(下称GN 436/63下称GN 436)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Implications of the Law of Child Act on the Intestate Rules of Customary Law in Tanzania
This paper explores legal implications of Child Act, 2009 concurrently with the intestate rules of customary law in Tanzania (to be on referred as intestate rules). From the discussion it is evident that little study has been done on this area of law since the colonial masters left 60 years ago. The main issue that this paper identifies is the inequality in provisions of the intestate succession laws, which is contrary to the provisions of equality, brought about by the Law of Child Act dispensation. The article also seeks to unearth contradictory application of the intestate rules of customary law in Tanzania. Reference is made to the leading judicial decisions which directly affects and alters the intestate rules. This is followed by a brief discussion of unequal intestate rules and judicial decisions. The inroads to be made in order to improve children right to parental property in this field of intestate rules are suggested including reform in this area of law. This study is limited to the applicability of codified intestate rules from patrilineal societies as provided under the Local Customary Law Declaration Order (NO. 4), GN 346/1963(to be referred as GN 436/63 to be referred as GN 436)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信