{"title":"比较糖尿病管理中的连续血糖监测仪(CGM):系统性文献综述","authors":"Rosilla Edward, Ronny Priefer","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2023.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>As diabetes prevalence has continued to increase in the United States, as well as globally, utilization of disease management techniques has also improved. The evolution in disease management for diabetes has adapted greatly from the initial dipstix method. Continuous glucose monitors have grown in popularity with its introduction to the market. After introduction of CGMs as part of DM management, various advancements have been made to the current models to promote the usage CGMs to promote glycemic control. The main competitors in the CGM market is Medtronic, Dexcom, Freestyle, and Eversense.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Information was primarily gathered by employing various PubMed scholarly articles for real-world examples in addition to data extraction from supplementary manuscripts. Articles were evaluated from over the past 20 years.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clinically improvement of disease management of blood glucose levels, specifically with regards to mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was utilized to highlight effectiveness of continuous glucose monitors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Of the four key continuous glucose monitors device on the market in the US, all have demonstrated to have similar beneficial qualities which can be utilized in both T1DM and T2DM patients. The best device for an individual would be based on their specific diabetes management goal (maintain TIR, decreasing TBR/TAR, decrease A1c).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48997,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) in diabetes management: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Rosilla Edward, Ronny Priefer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pcd.2023.10.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>As diabetes prevalence has continued to increase in the United States, as well as globally, utilization of disease management techniques has also improved. The evolution in disease management for diabetes has adapted greatly from the initial dipstix method. Continuous glucose monitors have grown in popularity with its introduction to the market. After introduction of CGMs as part of DM management, various advancements have been made to the current models to promote the usage CGMs to promote glycemic control. The main competitors in the CGM market is Medtronic, Dexcom, Freestyle, and Eversense.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Information was primarily gathered by employing various PubMed scholarly articles for real-world examples in addition to data extraction from supplementary manuscripts. Articles were evaluated from over the past 20 years.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clinically improvement of disease management of blood glucose levels, specifically with regards to mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was utilized to highlight effectiveness of continuous glucose monitors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Of the four key continuous glucose monitors device on the market in the US, all have demonstrated to have similar beneficial qualities which can be utilized in both T1DM and T2DM patients. The best device for an individual would be based on their specific diabetes management goal (maintain TIR, decreasing TBR/TAR, decrease A1c).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary Care Diabetes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary Care Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175199182300178X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175199182300178X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparison of continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) in diabetes management: A systematic literature review
Background and aims
As diabetes prevalence has continued to increase in the United States, as well as globally, utilization of disease management techniques has also improved. The evolution in disease management for diabetes has adapted greatly from the initial dipstix method. Continuous glucose monitors have grown in popularity with its introduction to the market. After introduction of CGMs as part of DM management, various advancements have been made to the current models to promote the usage CGMs to promote glycemic control. The main competitors in the CGM market is Medtronic, Dexcom, Freestyle, and Eversense.
Methods
Information was primarily gathered by employing various PubMed scholarly articles for real-world examples in addition to data extraction from supplementary manuscripts. Articles were evaluated from over the past 20 years.
Results
Clinically improvement of disease management of blood glucose levels, specifically with regards to mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was utilized to highlight effectiveness of continuous glucose monitors.
Conclusion
Of the four key continuous glucose monitors device on the market in the US, all have demonstrated to have similar beneficial qualities which can be utilized in both T1DM and T2DM patients. The best device for an individual would be based on their specific diabetes management goal (maintain TIR, decreasing TBR/TAR, decrease A1c).
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original research articles and high quality reviews in the fields of clinical care, diabetes education, nutrition, health services, psychosocial research and epidemiology and other areas as far as is relevant for diabetology in a primary-care setting. The purpose of the journal is to encourage interdisciplinary research and discussion between all those who are involved in primary diabetes care on an international level. The Journal also publishes news and articles concerning the policies and activities of Primary Care Diabetes Europe and reflects the society''s aim of improving the care for people with diabetes mellitus within the primary-care setting.