Comparison of lower extremity kinematics and ground reaction forces between adolescents who run in motion control shoes with adolescents who run in neutral shoes

AbstractDifferences in running biomechanics have been reported in adult long-distance runners when running in motion control or neutral shoes. The influence of growth and coordination refinement during puberty limits the generalisability of adult research to adolescents and it is unknown if biomechanics differ between adolescent who run in different types of shoes. The purpose of our study was to compare lower extremity kinematics and ground reaction forces between adolescents running in motion control or neutral shoes. We matched 18 adolescent long-distance runners who ran in motion control shoes with 18 adolescent long-distance runners who ran in neutral shoes according to running speed, sex, and physical maturation. We collected three-dimensional kinematic and ground reaction force data during overground running and performed statistical parametric mapping to compare joint angle and ground reaction force waveforms between the motion control and neutral shoe groups. We found no significant differences for hip, knee, or ankle joint angles (average differences <2°) or ground reaction forces (average differences <0.05 N/kg) between runners who ran in motion control or neutral shoes. Lower extremity kinematics and ground reaction forces were similar between adolescents who ran in motion control or neutral shoes.Keywords: footwearyouthkinematicsground reaction forcesstability Disclosure statementThe authors report no conflict of interest.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by a Wisconsin Athletic Trainers’ Association Assistance Research Grant.