爱思唯尔标志的演变和含义:标志修改及其对学术感知和透明度的影响的检验

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Jayantha Kalansooriya
{"title":"爱思唯尔标志的演变和含义:标志修改及其对学术感知和透明度的影响的检验","authors":"Jayantha Kalansooriya","doi":"10.36344/ccijhss.2023.v09i08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars often face pressure from their institutions to publish their research papers in journals published by Elsevier Group. However, there have been concerns raised by some scholars regarding alleged irregularities committed by Elsevier. This study aims to investigate the true nature of Elsevier and the authority it claims to exert over the world's scholarly knowledge. It is important to note that this study does not rely on scholarly criticisms of Elsevier. Instead, we adopt a historical inquiry approach to understand Elsevier's identity. The research employs the principles of connecting the dots and following the evidence, and is conducted with an open mind, outside the confines of traditional frameworks. During the investigation, it was discovered that Elsevier had tampered with their original logo, contradicting their claim of using the authentic version. This revelation suggests that they may have been attempting to conceal certain aspects of their organization from scholars. Therefore, this study invites scholars to reexamine Elsevier, irrespective of public opinion and perceived authority.","PeriodicalId":42142,"journal":{"name":"Cross Currents","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution and Implications of the Elsevier Logo: An Examination of Logo Modifications and their Impact on Scholarly Perception and Transparency\",\"authors\":\"Jayantha Kalansooriya\",\"doi\":\"10.36344/ccijhss.2023.v09i08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scholars often face pressure from their institutions to publish their research papers in journals published by Elsevier Group. However, there have been concerns raised by some scholars regarding alleged irregularities committed by Elsevier. This study aims to investigate the true nature of Elsevier and the authority it claims to exert over the world's scholarly knowledge. It is important to note that this study does not rely on scholarly criticisms of Elsevier. Instead, we adopt a historical inquiry approach to understand Elsevier's identity. The research employs the principles of connecting the dots and following the evidence, and is conducted with an open mind, outside the confines of traditional frameworks. During the investigation, it was discovered that Elsevier had tampered with their original logo, contradicting their claim of using the authentic version. This revelation suggests that they may have been attempting to conceal certain aspects of their organization from scholars. Therefore, this study invites scholars to reexamine Elsevier, irrespective of public opinion and perceived authority.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cross Currents\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cross Currents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36344/ccijhss.2023.v09i08.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross Currents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36344/ccijhss.2023.v09i08.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学者们经常面临来自机构的压力,要求他们在爱思唯尔集团出版的期刊上发表研究论文。然而,一些学者对爱思唯尔涉嫌违规行为表示担忧。这项研究的目的是调查爱思唯尔的真实性质,以及它声称对世界学术知识施加的权威。值得注意的是,这项研究并不依赖于对爱思唯尔的学术批评。相反,我们采用历史调查的方法来了解爱思唯尔的身份。这项研究采用了联系线索和循证的原则,并以开放的心态进行,超越了传统框架的局限。在调查过程中,发现爱思唯尔篡改了他们的原始标识,这与他们声称使用的是正版标识相矛盾。这一发现表明,他们可能一直试图向学者隐瞒他们组织的某些方面。因此,本研究邀请学者重新审视爱思唯尔,而不考虑公众舆论和感知权威。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Evolution and Implications of the Elsevier Logo: An Examination of Logo Modifications and their Impact on Scholarly Perception and Transparency
Scholars often face pressure from their institutions to publish their research papers in journals published by Elsevier Group. However, there have been concerns raised by some scholars regarding alleged irregularities committed by Elsevier. This study aims to investigate the true nature of Elsevier and the authority it claims to exert over the world's scholarly knowledge. It is important to note that this study does not rely on scholarly criticisms of Elsevier. Instead, we adopt a historical inquiry approach to understand Elsevier's identity. The research employs the principles of connecting the dots and following the evidence, and is conducted with an open mind, outside the confines of traditional frameworks. During the investigation, it was discovered that Elsevier had tampered with their original logo, contradicting their claim of using the authentic version. This revelation suggests that they may have been attempting to conceal certain aspects of their organization from scholars. Therefore, this study invites scholars to reexamine Elsevier, irrespective of public opinion and perceived authority.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cross Currents
Cross Currents RELIGION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信