两人成公司，三人成云:解释自然灾害对饮用水健康违规行为的影响
IF 1.9
Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
引用次数: 0
摘要
识别违规行为是环境合规的核心，特别是检测危及人类健康和安全的污染物。对各州饮用水合规计划的审查表明，各州确定基于健康的违规行为的比率和频率差异很大。以前的学术研究将这种变化大部分归因于人为原因。研究较少的是自然灾害和其他自然事件的作用，它们也可能影响合规结果。为了解决这一差距，我们建立并利用了1993年至2016年根据《安全饮用水法》(SDWA)报告的州报告的基于健康的违规行为的新数据集。我们对严重风暴、飓风、洪水和火灾等事件对基于健康的违法行为模式的作用特别感兴趣。结果表明，并不是所有的焦点事件都是平等产生的，与火灾和洪水相比，严重的风暴和飓风与国家机构确定的一系列违规行为有关。本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
Two's a company, three's a cloud: Explaining the effect of natural disasters on health‐based violations in drinking water
Abstract Identifying violations is at the heart of environmental compliance, especially detecting contaminants that endanger human health and safety. A review of state drinking water compliance programs demonstrates that the rate and frequency of identifying health‐based violations varies significantly across the states. Previous scholarship has attributed much of this variation to anthropogenic causes. Less studied is the role of natural disasters and other natural events, which may also influence compliance outcomes. To address this gap, we build and utilize a novel data set of state‐reported health‐based violations reported under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) from 1993 to 2016. We are particularly interested in the role that events, such as severe storms, hurricanes, floods, and fires, have on the patterns of health‐based violations. Results indicate that not all focusing events are created equally and that severe storms and hurricanes are associated with state agencies identifying a flurry of violations as compared to fires and flooding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。
去求助
来源期刊
Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍：
Scholarship on risk, hazards, and crises (emergencies, disasters, or public policy/organizational crises) has developed into mature and distinct fields of inquiry. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy (RHCPP) addresses the governance implications of the important questions raised for the respective fields. The relationships between risk, hazards, and crisis raise fundamental questions with broad social science and policy implications. During unstable situations of acute or chronic danger and substantial uncertainty (i.e. a crisis), important and deeply rooted societal institutions, norms, and values come into play. The purpose of RHCPP is to provide a forum for research and commentary that examines societies’ understanding of and measures to address risk,hazards, and crises, how public policies do and should address these concerns, and to what effect. The journal is explicitly designed to encourage a broad range of perspectives by integrating work from a variety of disciplines. The journal will look at social science theory and policy design across the spectrum of risks and crises — including natural and technological hazards, public health crises, terrorism, and societal and environmental disasters. Papers will analyze the ways societies deal with both unpredictable and predictable events as public policy questions, which include topics such as crisis governance, loss and liability, emergency response, agenda setting, and the social and cultural contexts in which hazards, risks and crises are perceived and defined. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy invites dialogue and is open to new approaches. We seek scholarly work that combines academic quality with practical relevance. We especially welcome authors writing on the governance of risk and crises to submit their manuscripts.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
