认知负荷对内外部分心的影响及其与注意控制的关系

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jan Rummel, Fynn Ole Wöstenfeld, Lena Steindorf, Jan Philipp Röer
{"title":"认知负荷对内外部分心的影响及其与注意控制的关系","authors":"Jan Rummel, Fynn Ole Wöstenfeld, Lena Steindorf, Jan Philipp Röer","doi":"10.1080/20445911.2023.2273576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPeople are assumed to differ in their susceptibility to distraction, depending on their attentional control abilities. Accordingly, susceptibility to internal distraction (in terms of self-generated task-irrelevant thoughts) and to external distraction (in terms of task-irrelevant environmental stimuli) are considered two facets of a global attention-distractibility factor. While it is plausible that these two constructs overlap to some extent, susceptibility to internal and external distraction may nevertheless differ across situations. We thus investigated whether objective changes in external stimulation (manipulated by the presence versus absence of concurrent irrelevant speech) differentially affect perceived external and internal distraction during an ongoing task, and how both distraction types are related to attentional control. In Experiment 1, we used a working-memory task as ongoing task, in Experiment 2, we used a less demanding lexical-decision task. Results of both experiments consistently showed that perceived external distraction was increased whereas perceived internal distraction was decreased under irrelevant speech. Interestingly, attentional control was weakly positively related with perceived external distraction under irrelevant speech conditions. These results highlight that mutual dependencies between internal and external distraction experiences may be more complex than hitherto assumed.KEYWORDS: distractiontask-unrelated thoughtsirrelevant speechmind wandering Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We thank Matthew Robison for sharing his programme with us.2 We thank Frederik Wallner, who also wrote his master thesis in this project, for his help with the data collection.3 We thank an anonymous reviewer for bringing this interpretation of the findings to our attention","PeriodicalId":47483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","volume":"53 28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of cognitive load on perceived internal and external distraction and their relationship with attentional control\",\"authors\":\"Jan Rummel, Fynn Ole Wöstenfeld, Lena Steindorf, Jan Philipp Röer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20445911.2023.2273576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTPeople are assumed to differ in their susceptibility to distraction, depending on their attentional control abilities. Accordingly, susceptibility to internal distraction (in terms of self-generated task-irrelevant thoughts) and to external distraction (in terms of task-irrelevant environmental stimuli) are considered two facets of a global attention-distractibility factor. While it is plausible that these two constructs overlap to some extent, susceptibility to internal and external distraction may nevertheless differ across situations. We thus investigated whether objective changes in external stimulation (manipulated by the presence versus absence of concurrent irrelevant speech) differentially affect perceived external and internal distraction during an ongoing task, and how both distraction types are related to attentional control. In Experiment 1, we used a working-memory task as ongoing task, in Experiment 2, we used a less demanding lexical-decision task. Results of both experiments consistently showed that perceived external distraction was increased whereas perceived internal distraction was decreased under irrelevant speech. Interestingly, attentional control was weakly positively related with perceived external distraction under irrelevant speech conditions. These results highlight that mutual dependencies between internal and external distraction experiences may be more complex than hitherto assumed.KEYWORDS: distractiontask-unrelated thoughtsirrelevant speechmind wandering Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We thank Matthew Robison for sharing his programme with us.2 We thank Frederik Wallner, who also wrote his master thesis in this project, for his help with the data collection.3 We thank an anonymous reviewer for bringing this interpretation of the findings to our attention\",\"PeriodicalId\":47483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"53 28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2273576\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2273576","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要人们被认为对注意力分散的易感性是不同的,这取决于他们的注意力控制能力。因此,对内部分心的易感性(就自我产生的与任务无关的想法而言)和对外部分心的易感性(就与任务无关的环境刺激而言)被认为是全球注意力分心因素的两个方面。虽然这两种结构在某种程度上重叠是合理的,但对内部和外部分心的易感性可能在不同的情况下有所不同。因此,我们研究了在正在进行的任务中,外部刺激的客观变化(由并发不相关言语的存在或不存在操纵)是否会对感知到的外部和内部分心产生不同的影响,以及这两种分心类型如何与注意控制相关。在实验1中,我们使用工作记忆任务作为进行中任务,在实验2中,我们使用要求较低的词汇决策任务。实验结果一致表明,在不相关言语作用下,被试的外部干扰增加,内部干扰减少。有趣的是,在无关言语条件下,注意控制与感知到的外部分心呈弱正相关。这些结果强调,内部和外部分心体验之间的相互依赖关系可能比迄今为止认为的要复杂得多。关键词:注意力分散任务无关思想相关言论走神披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突我们感谢马修·罗宾逊与我们分享他的节目我们感谢Frederik Wallner,他也是这个项目的硕士论文的作者,他对数据收集的帮助我们感谢一位匿名审稿人让我们注意到他对研究结果的解释
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of cognitive load on perceived internal and external distraction and their relationship with attentional control
ABSTRACTPeople are assumed to differ in their susceptibility to distraction, depending on their attentional control abilities. Accordingly, susceptibility to internal distraction (in terms of self-generated task-irrelevant thoughts) and to external distraction (in terms of task-irrelevant environmental stimuli) are considered two facets of a global attention-distractibility factor. While it is plausible that these two constructs overlap to some extent, susceptibility to internal and external distraction may nevertheless differ across situations. We thus investigated whether objective changes in external stimulation (manipulated by the presence versus absence of concurrent irrelevant speech) differentially affect perceived external and internal distraction during an ongoing task, and how both distraction types are related to attentional control. In Experiment 1, we used a working-memory task as ongoing task, in Experiment 2, we used a less demanding lexical-decision task. Results of both experiments consistently showed that perceived external distraction was increased whereas perceived internal distraction was decreased under irrelevant speech. Interestingly, attentional control was weakly positively related with perceived external distraction under irrelevant speech conditions. These results highlight that mutual dependencies between internal and external distraction experiences may be more complex than hitherto assumed.KEYWORDS: distractiontask-unrelated thoughtsirrelevant speechmind wandering Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We thank Matthew Robison for sharing his programme with us.2 We thank Frederik Wallner, who also wrote his master thesis in this project, for his help with the data collection.3 We thank an anonymous reviewer for bringing this interpretation of the findings to our attention
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Journal of Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信