计量吸入器和干粉吸入器使用者吸入技术错误分析

K. Chaudhary, A. Kumar
{"title":"计量吸入器和干粉吸入器使用者吸入技术错误分析","authors":"K. Chaudhary, A. Kumar","doi":"10.26697/ijsa.2023.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim of Study: Decreased efficacy of metered dose inhaler and dry powder inhalers are associated with errors in inhalational techniques. The aim of the study: to study the association of errors in the technique for using two types of inhalers with demographic and other variables. Material and Methods: Five hundred adult patients with respiratory diseases who were currently using an inhaler device were enrolled in this study. Patient’s demographics and duration of inhaler therapy and assessment of inhaler technique were recorded by interview and direct observation. Results: Out of 500 enrolled patients, 465 patients were using the device with wrong technique. Among 465 patients, 188 patients were using metered dose inhaler and 277 patients were using dry powder inhalers. Technical errors were common in both the devices but more common with metered dose inhaler device. Failure to exhale before the inhale through device was most common error with metered dose inhaler (68.6%) and dry powder inhalers (71.4%). Association of errors with female gender is seen in both metered dose inhaler and dry powder inhalers users. Reduction in the numbers of errors is seen with increase in the duration of therapy and regular training on follow-up visits. Conclusions: Dry powder inhalers and metered dose inhalers are commonly used in management of respiratory patients. Therefore, the errors in using these devices, technique and handling errors are common in both dry powder inhalers and metered dose inhaler users. More error was found in old age, female and short-term users. However regular training on follows up visits can solve this current problem.","PeriodicalId":52800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science Annals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of inhalation technique errors in metered-dose inhaler and dry powder inhaler users\",\"authors\":\"K. Chaudhary, A. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.26697/ijsa.2023.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim of Study: Decreased efficacy of metered dose inhaler and dry powder inhalers are associated with errors in inhalational techniques. The aim of the study: to study the association of errors in the technique for using two types of inhalers with demographic and other variables. Material and Methods: Five hundred adult patients with respiratory diseases who were currently using an inhaler device were enrolled in this study. Patient’s demographics and duration of inhaler therapy and assessment of inhaler technique were recorded by interview and direct observation. Results: Out of 500 enrolled patients, 465 patients were using the device with wrong technique. Among 465 patients, 188 patients were using metered dose inhaler and 277 patients were using dry powder inhalers. Technical errors were common in both the devices but more common with metered dose inhaler device. Failure to exhale before the inhale through device was most common error with metered dose inhaler (68.6%) and dry powder inhalers (71.4%). Association of errors with female gender is seen in both metered dose inhaler and dry powder inhalers users. Reduction in the numbers of errors is seen with increase in the duration of therapy and regular training on follow-up visits. Conclusions: Dry powder inhalers and metered dose inhalers are commonly used in management of respiratory patients. Therefore, the errors in using these devices, technique and handling errors are common in both dry powder inhalers and metered dose inhaler users. More error was found in old age, female and short-term users. However regular training on follows up visits can solve this current problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Science Annals\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Science Annals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26697/ijsa.2023.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26697/ijsa.2023.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景和目的:计量吸入器和干粉吸入器的疗效下降与吸入技术的错误有关。本研究的目的是:研究使用两种吸入器的技术误差与人口统计学和其他变量的关系。材料和方法:本研究纳入了500名目前正在使用吸入器装置的呼吸系统疾病成年患者。通过访谈和直接观察记录患者的人口统计学特征、吸入器治疗持续时间和吸入器技术评估。结果:在500例入组患者中,有465例患者使用了错误的技术。465例患者中,计量吸入器使用188例,干粉吸入器使用277例。技术错误在这两种装置中都很常见,但在计量吸入器装置中更为常见。计量吸入器(68.6%)和干粉吸入器(71.4%)最常见的错误是在吸入前呼气失败。在计量吸入器和干粉吸入器使用者中都可以看到与女性有关的错误。随着治疗时间的延长和定期随访培训的增加,错误的数量有所减少。结论:干粉吸入器和计量吸入器是呼吸系统患者常用的吸入器。因此,在干粉吸入器和计量吸入器使用者中,使用这些装置、技术和处理错误是常见的。在老年人、女性和短期使用者中发现了更多的错误。然而,定期的随访培训可以解决当前的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An analysis of inhalation technique errors in metered-dose inhaler and dry powder inhaler users
Background and Aim of Study: Decreased efficacy of metered dose inhaler and dry powder inhalers are associated with errors in inhalational techniques. The aim of the study: to study the association of errors in the technique for using two types of inhalers with demographic and other variables. Material and Methods: Five hundred adult patients with respiratory diseases who were currently using an inhaler device were enrolled in this study. Patient’s demographics and duration of inhaler therapy and assessment of inhaler technique were recorded by interview and direct observation. Results: Out of 500 enrolled patients, 465 patients were using the device with wrong technique. Among 465 patients, 188 patients were using metered dose inhaler and 277 patients were using dry powder inhalers. Technical errors were common in both the devices but more common with metered dose inhaler device. Failure to exhale before the inhale through device was most common error with metered dose inhaler (68.6%) and dry powder inhalers (71.4%). Association of errors with female gender is seen in both metered dose inhaler and dry powder inhalers users. Reduction in the numbers of errors is seen with increase in the duration of therapy and regular training on follow-up visits. Conclusions: Dry powder inhalers and metered dose inhalers are commonly used in management of respiratory patients. Therefore, the errors in using these devices, technique and handling errors are common in both dry powder inhalers and metered dose inhaler users. More error was found in old age, female and short-term users. However regular training on follows up visits can solve this current problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信