左边缘的制图方法

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Concentric-Studies in Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.17002/sil..69.202310.133

Jeongmin Han

{"title":"左边缘的制图方法","authors":"Jeongmin Han","doi":"10.17002/sil..69.202310.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rizzi(1997: 297) suggests that the recursion of ForceP and FocP in the structure of the left periphery is banned. However, there are some structures that have double complementizers and subject-multiple auxiliaries inversion in embedded clauses. Gelderen(2004), Radford (2018), Nyvad(2016), and Jang(2014) present double complementizer structures such as that+if/whether/wh-word which one ForceP cannot accommodate. In addition, regarding FocP, Culicover & Winkler(2008) and Park(2012) suggest subject-multiple auxiliaries inversion in embedded than/nor clauses. In general, head movement of T to FocP accounts for the type that inverts single auxiliary, but is incompatible with the type of multiple auxiliaries inversion. Many theoretical proposals have difficulty in accounting for these structures. This paper proposes Split-ForceP and Split-FocP to solve these phenomena which existing theories cannot explain properly.","PeriodicalId":41887,"journal":{"name":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","volume":"39 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cartographic Approach of the Left Periphery\",\"authors\":\"Jeongmin Han\",\"doi\":\"10.17002/sil..69.202310.133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rizzi(1997: 297) suggests that the recursion of ForceP and FocP in the structure of the left periphery is banned. However, there are some structures that have double complementizers and subject-multiple auxiliaries inversion in embedded clauses. Gelderen(2004), Radford (2018), Nyvad(2016), and Jang(2014) present double complementizer structures such as that+if/whether/wh-word which one ForceP cannot accommodate. In addition, regarding FocP, Culicover & Winkler(2008) and Park(2012) suggest subject-multiple auxiliaries inversion in embedded than/nor clauses. In general, head movement of T to FocP accounts for the type that inverts single auxiliary, but is incompatible with the type of multiple auxiliaries inversion. Many theoretical proposals have difficulty in accounting for these structures. This paper proposes Split-ForceP and Split-FocP to solve these phenomena which existing theories cannot explain properly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"39 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17002/sil..69.202310.133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17002/sil..69.202310.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

Rizzi(1997: 297)认为在左外周结构中禁止ForceP和FocP的递归。然而，在嵌入子句中，也存在双补语和主-多助语倒装的结构。Gelderen(2004)， Radford (2018)， Nyvad(2016)和Jang(2014)提出了双补语结构，例如+if/whether/wh-word，这是一个ForceP无法容纳的。此外，关于FocP, culicover&winkler(2008)和Park(2012)建议在嵌入的than/nor从句中使用主语-多助词倒转。一般情况下，T向fcp的头部运动属于单辅倒转型，但与多辅倒转型不相容。许多理论建议难以解释这些结构。为了解决这些现有理论无法很好解释的现象，本文提出了split - force和Split-FocP。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Cartographic Approach of the Left Periphery

Rizzi(1997: 297) suggests that the recursion of ForceP and FocP in the structure of the left periphery is banned. However, there are some structures that have double complementizers and subject-multiple auxiliaries inversion in embedded clauses. Gelderen(2004), Radford (2018), Nyvad(2016), and Jang(2014) present double complementizer structures such as that+if/whether/wh-word which one ForceP cannot accommodate. In addition, regarding FocP, Culicover & Winkler(2008) and Park(2012) suggest subject-multiple auxiliaries inversion in embedded than/nor clauses. In general, head movement of T to FocP accounts for the type that inverts single auxiliary, but is incompatible with the type of multiple auxiliaries inversion. Many theoretical proposals have difficulty in accounting for these structures. This paper proposes Split-ForceP and Split-FocP to solve these phenomena which existing theories cannot explain properly.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Concentric-Studies in Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Concentric: Studies in Linguistics is a refereed, biannual journal, publishing research articles on all aspects of linguistic studies on the languages in the Asia-Pacific region. Review articles and book reviews with solid argumentation are also considered. The journal is indexed in Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Modern Language Association (MLA) Directory of Periodicals, MLA International Bibliography, Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA), EBSCOhost, Communication & Mass Media Complete (CMMC), Airiti Library (AL), Taiwan Citation Index-Humanities and Social Sciences, and Taiwan Humanities Citation Index(THCI)-Level 1. First published in 1964 under the title,The Concentric, the journal aimed to promote academic research in the fields of linguistics and English literature, and to provide an avenue for researchers to share results of their investigations with other researchers and practitioners. Later in 1976, the journal was renamed as Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, and in 2001 was further renamed as Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics. As the quantity of research in the fields of theoretical linguistics, applied linguistics, and English literature has increased greatly in recent years, the journal has evolved into two publications. Beginning in 2004, these two journals have been published under the titles Concentric: Studies in Linguistics and Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies respectively.