单吻合术胃旁路手术是一种很好的矫正减肥手术吗?单中心回顾性队列研究

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Tomasz Maroszczuk, Julia Lewandowska, Jan Maciej Kapała, Paweł Lech, Natalia Dowgiałło-Gornowicz
{"title":"单吻合术胃旁路手术是一种很好的矫正减肥手术吗?单中心回顾性队列研究","authors":"Tomasz Maroszczuk, Julia Lewandowska, Jan Maciej Kapała, Paweł Lech, Natalia Dowgiałło-Gornowicz","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.9293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The rate of revisional surgeries following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has increased. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) appears to have multiple advantages as a primary bariatric procedure. As revisional surgery is still being investigated.Aim: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of OAGB performed as a post-SG revisional surgery.Material and methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted using a routinely collected database of adults undergoing revisional OAGB after SG. A survey of patients was conducted, obtaining information on changes in body weight and improvement in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and obesity-related diseases.Results: The study group included 74 patients: 59 women (80%) and 15 men, mean age of 41.619.21 years. The most common indication for OAGB was weight regain. The follow-up was up to 7 years, the mean time was 3.581.21 years. The mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 40.386.15. All patients experienced significant weight loss, reaching a BMI of 33.61 (27.28-37.13) at the last observation. After surgery, 35% of patients achieved successful weight loss and 48% of patients achieved remission or improvement of GERD.Conclusion: Revisional OAGB seems to be a good alternative after a failed SG in terms of obesity-related diseases recurrence, not of weight regain. Long-term follow-up revealed that only a third of patients achieved successful weight loss. When proposing revisional OAGB, the risk of complications - mainly anemia and the possibility of de novo GERD should be considered.Keywords: one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), revisional surgery, obesity, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is one-anastomosis gastric bypass a good revisional bariatric surgery? A single center retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Tomasz Maroszczuk, Julia Lewandowska, Jan Maciej Kapała, Paweł Lech, Natalia Dowgiałło-Gornowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0053.9293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The rate of revisional surgeries following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has increased. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) appears to have multiple advantages as a primary bariatric procedure. As revisional surgery is still being investigated.Aim: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of OAGB performed as a post-SG revisional surgery.Material and methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted using a routinely collected database of adults undergoing revisional OAGB after SG. A survey of patients was conducted, obtaining information on changes in body weight and improvement in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and obesity-related diseases.Results: The study group included 74 patients: 59 women (80%) and 15 men, mean age of 41.619.21 years. The most common indication for OAGB was weight regain. The follow-up was up to 7 years, the mean time was 3.581.21 years. The mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 40.386.15. All patients experienced significant weight loss, reaching a BMI of 33.61 (27.28-37.13) at the last observation. After surgery, 35% of patients achieved successful weight loss and 48% of patients achieved remission or improvement of GERD.Conclusion: Revisional OAGB seems to be a good alternative after a failed SG in terms of obesity-related diseases recurrence, not of weight regain. Long-term follow-up revealed that only a third of patients achieved successful weight loss. When proposing revisional OAGB, the risk of complications - mainly anemia and the possibility of de novo GERD should be considered.Keywords: one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), revisional surgery, obesity, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)\",\"PeriodicalId\":43422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:袖式胃切除术(SG)后的修补手术率有所增加。单吻合术胃旁路术(OAGB)作为一种主要的减肥手术似乎有多种优点。由于修复手术仍在研究中。目的:评价OAGB作为sg后修补手术的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,使用常规收集的SG后进行修订OAGB的成人数据库。对患者进行了一项调查,以获得有关体重变化和胃食管反流病(GERD)及肥胖相关疾病改善的信息。结果:研究组纳入74例患者,其中女性59例(80%),男性15例,平均年龄41.619.21岁。OAGB最常见的适应症是体重反弹。随访7年,平均随访时间3.581.21年。术前平均体重指数(BMI)为40.386.15。所有患者体重均显著减轻,最后一次观察时BMI为33.61(27.28-37.13)。手术后,35%的患者体重成功减轻,48%的患者胃食管反流得到缓解或改善。结论:就肥胖相关疾病复发而言,在SG失败后,修正OAGB似乎是一个很好的选择,而不是体重恢复。长期随访显示,只有三分之一的患者成功减肥。当建议修订OAGB时,应考虑并发症的风险-主要是贫血和新生GERD的可能性。关键词:单吻合式胃旁路术(OAGB),矫正手术,肥胖,胃食管反流病(GERD)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is one-anastomosis gastric bypass a good revisional bariatric surgery? A single center retrospective cohort study
Introduction: The rate of revisional surgeries following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has increased. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) appears to have multiple advantages as a primary bariatric procedure. As revisional surgery is still being investigated.Aim: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of OAGB performed as a post-SG revisional surgery.Material and methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted using a routinely collected database of adults undergoing revisional OAGB after SG. A survey of patients was conducted, obtaining information on changes in body weight and improvement in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and obesity-related diseases.Results: The study group included 74 patients: 59 women (80%) and 15 men, mean age of 41.619.21 years. The most common indication for OAGB was weight regain. The follow-up was up to 7 years, the mean time was 3.581.21 years. The mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 40.386.15. All patients experienced significant weight loss, reaching a BMI of 33.61 (27.28-37.13) at the last observation. After surgery, 35% of patients achieved successful weight loss and 48% of patients achieved remission or improvement of GERD.Conclusion: Revisional OAGB seems to be a good alternative after a failed SG in terms of obesity-related diseases recurrence, not of weight regain. Long-term follow-up revealed that only a third of patients achieved successful weight loss. When proposing revisional OAGB, the risk of complications - mainly anemia and the possibility of de novo GERD should be considered.Keywords: one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), revisional surgery, obesity, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信