康斯坦丁在约翰·惠瑟姆斯泰德的谷仓中的捐赠

IF 0.6 2区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Historical Research Pub Date : 2023-02-27 DOI:10.1093/hisres/htac031

Alfred Hiatt

{"title":"康斯坦丁在约翰·惠瑟姆斯泰德的谷仓中的捐赠","authors":"Alfred Hiatt","doi":"10.1093/hisres/htac031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article analyses the discussion of the Donation of Constantine contained in the Granarium, an encyclopedia compiled by the abbot of St. Albans, John Whethamstede, in the 1430s. Particular attention is given to Whethamstede’s list of reasons to doubt the veracity of the Donation, which differ in certain ways from the contemporaneous and better known criticisms of the Donation made by Nicolas of Cusa, Lorenzo Valla and Reginald Pecock. The article considers the sources and motivations for Whethamstede’s discussion, which reveals that criticism of the Donation was more widespread and more deeply rooted at this time than has previously been appreciated.","PeriodicalId":13059,"journal":{"name":"Historical Research","volume":"232 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The <i>Donation of Constantine</i> in John Whethamstede’s <i>Granarium</i>\",\"authors\":\"Alfred Hiatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/hisres/htac031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article analyses the discussion of the Donation of Constantine contained in the Granarium, an encyclopedia compiled by the abbot of St. Albans, John Whethamstede, in the 1430s. Particular attention is given to Whethamstede’s list of reasons to doubt the veracity of the Donation, which differ in certain ways from the contemporaneous and better known criticisms of the Donation made by Nicolas of Cusa, Lorenzo Valla and Reginald Pecock. The article considers the sources and motivations for Whethamstede’s discussion, which reveals that criticism of the Donation was more widespread and more deeply rooted at this time than has previously been appreciated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historical Research\",\"volume\":\"232 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/hisres/htac031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hisres/htac031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文分析了圣奥尔本斯修道院院长约翰·惠瑟姆斯泰德于1430年代编纂的百科全书《粮仓》中关于君士坦丁捐赠的论述。特别要注意的是，Whethamstede列出了怀疑捐赠真实性的理由，这些理由在某些方面不同于同时代的、更广为人知的对尼古拉斯·库萨(Nicolas of Cusa)、洛伦佐·瓦拉(Lorenzo Valla)和雷金纳德·佩科克(Reginald Pecock)对捐赠的批评。本文考虑了Whethamstede讨论的来源和动机，揭示了对捐赠的批评在这个时候比以前所认识的更广泛和更深入。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Donation of Constantine in John Whethamstede’s Granarium

Abstract This article analyses the discussion of the Donation of Constantine contained in the Granarium, an encyclopedia compiled by the abbot of St. Albans, John Whethamstede, in the 1430s. Particular attention is given to Whethamstede’s list of reasons to doubt the veracity of the Donation, which differ in certain ways from the contemporaneous and better known criticisms of the Donation made by Nicolas of Cusa, Lorenzo Valla and Reginald Pecock. The article considers the sources and motivations for Whethamstede’s discussion, which reveals that criticism of the Donation was more widespread and more deeply rooted at this time than has previously been appreciated.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Historical Research HISTORY-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since 1923, Historical Research has been a leading mainstream British historical journal. Its articles cover a wide geographical and temporal span: from the early middle ages to the twentieth century. It encourages the submission of articles from a broad variety of approaches, including social, political, urban, intellectual and cultural history.