利用多门方法重建防止土地焚烧的法律政策模型

IF 0.6 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Aji Kurnia Dermawan, Sigid Suseno, Adrian E. Rompis, Dadang Epi Sukarsa
{"title":"利用多门方法重建防止土地焚烧的法律政策模型","authors":"Aji Kurnia Dermawan, Sigid Suseno, Adrian E. Rompis, Dadang Epi Sukarsa","doi":"10.47836/pjssh.31.3.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to find an effective legal policy model for handling the criminal case of plantation land opening by fire, especially those carried out by corporations in Indonesia. Criminal law enforcement in these cases is not yet fully integrated. Thus, it requires the multidoor approach. The multidoor approach utilizes several criminal provisions to maximize all constitutional potentials and minimize failures starting from the investigation, prosecution, and punishment stages. This research was carried out by analyzing relevant legal principles, doctrines, rules, and norms. The constitution and courtly decisions were the main primary legal materials. This research shows that most plantation burning cases are not yet processed using the multidoor approach. Most of the prosecution’s indictments are prepared alternatively. They exclude the possibility of the cumulative application of other crimes as concurrent criminal acts (concursus). Based on the results, it was found that the multidoor approach needs to be reconstructed by strengthening the secretariat and the standard operating procedures in applying the multidoor approach that binds all law enforcement agencies. This crime has been classified as an environmental crime in the law, and it applies the premium remedium principle. The imposition of corporate criminal liability must be carried out maximally to prevent repeating the criminal acts that still frequently occur.","PeriodicalId":46412,"journal":{"name":"Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconstruction of the Legal Policy Model Using the Multidoor Approach to Prevent Land Burning\",\"authors\":\"Aji Kurnia Dermawan, Sigid Suseno, Adrian E. Rompis, Dadang Epi Sukarsa\",\"doi\":\"10.47836/pjssh.31.3.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to find an effective legal policy model for handling the criminal case of plantation land opening by fire, especially those carried out by corporations in Indonesia. Criminal law enforcement in these cases is not yet fully integrated. Thus, it requires the multidoor approach. The multidoor approach utilizes several criminal provisions to maximize all constitutional potentials and minimize failures starting from the investigation, prosecution, and punishment stages. This research was carried out by analyzing relevant legal principles, doctrines, rules, and norms. The constitution and courtly decisions were the main primary legal materials. This research shows that most plantation burning cases are not yet processed using the multidoor approach. Most of the prosecution’s indictments are prepared alternatively. They exclude the possibility of the cumulative application of other crimes as concurrent criminal acts (concursus). Based on the results, it was found that the multidoor approach needs to be reconstructed by strengthening the secretariat and the standard operating procedures in applying the multidoor approach that binds all law enforcement agencies. This crime has been classified as an environmental crime in the law, and it applies the premium remedium principle. The imposition of corporate criminal liability must be carried out maximally to prevent repeating the criminal acts that still frequently occur.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.31.3.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.31.3.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在寻找一种有效的法律政策模式,以处理印度尼西亚的种植园放火刑事案件,特别是企业实施的种植园放火刑事案件。这些案件的刑事执法尚未完全结合起来。因此,它需要多门方法。从调查、起诉、处罚阶段开始,利用多项刑事规定,最大限度地发挥宪法的潜力,最大限度地减少失败。本研究是通过分析相关的法律原则、学说、规则和规范来进行的。宪法和法院判决是主要的初级法律资料。这项研究表明,大多数种植园焚烧案件尚未使用多通道方法进行处理。检方的大部分起诉书都是交替准备的。它们排除了累加适用其他罪行作为共同犯罪行为的可能性。根据调查结果,发现需要通过加强秘书处和适用对所有执法机构都有约束力的多门办法的标准作业程序来重建多门办法。该犯罪在法律上被归类为环境犯罪,适用补偿金原则。必须最大限度地实施公司刑事责任,以防止仍然经常发生的犯罪行为再次发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconstruction of the Legal Policy Model Using the Multidoor Approach to Prevent Land Burning
This research aims to find an effective legal policy model for handling the criminal case of plantation land opening by fire, especially those carried out by corporations in Indonesia. Criminal law enforcement in these cases is not yet fully integrated. Thus, it requires the multidoor approach. The multidoor approach utilizes several criminal provisions to maximize all constitutional potentials and minimize failures starting from the investigation, prosecution, and punishment stages. This research was carried out by analyzing relevant legal principles, doctrines, rules, and norms. The constitution and courtly decisions were the main primary legal materials. This research shows that most plantation burning cases are not yet processed using the multidoor approach. Most of the prosecution’s indictments are prepared alternatively. They exclude the possibility of the cumulative application of other crimes as concurrent criminal acts (concursus). Based on the results, it was found that the multidoor approach needs to be reconstructed by strengthening the secretariat and the standard operating procedures in applying the multidoor approach that binds all law enforcement agencies. This crime has been classified as an environmental crime in the law, and it applies the premium remedium principle. The imposition of corporate criminal liability must be carried out maximally to prevent repeating the criminal acts that still frequently occur.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities
Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities aims to develop as a pioneer journal for the social sciences with a focus on emerging issues pertaining to the social and behavioural sciences as well as the humanities. Areas relevant to the scope of the journal include Social Sciences - Accounting, anthropology, Archaeology and history, Architecture and habitat, Consumer and family economics, Economics, Education, Finance, Geography, Law, Management studies, Media and communication studies, Political sciences and public policy, Population studies, Psychology, Sociology, Technology management, Tourism; Humanities - Arts and culture, Dance, Historical and civilisation studies, Language and Linguistics, Literature, Music, Philosophy, Religious studies, Sports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信