Mudessarat Rafaq, Noman Ali Ghazanfar, Obaid Ur Rehman, Fayyaz Ur Rehman Haider, Shabbar Hussain Changazi, Muhammad Shahzad Anwar
{"title":"体外冲击波碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术联合坦索罗辛治疗输尿管上段结石清除的比较","authors":"Mudessarat Rafaq, Noman Ali Ghazanfar, Obaid Ur Rehman, Fayyaz Ur Rehman Haider, Shabbar Hussain Changazi, Muhammad Shahzad Anwar","doi":"10.51273/esc23.2519218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess its role in stone clearance along with ESWLin patients with upper ureteric stones. Method: This clinical trial was conducted from February 2018 to December 2021 at the Department of Urology, Services Hospital Lahore.. Atotal of 164 patients (82 in each group) of both sexes between the ages of 18 and 70 years with upper ureteric stone (6mm-15mm) were included in this study. These patients were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in group A received ESWL alone, while patients in group B received ESWL in combination with tamsulosin therapy. Follow-up visits with CT KUB Plain were planned 4 weeks postoperatively to assess stone clearance Results: The mean age of patients was 44.01±10.88 years. The study included 124 (75.6%) male and 40 (24.4%) female patients. The mean size of stones was 9.59±2.72 mm. Both the groups were comparable in terms of mean age (p=0.539), mean stone size (p=0.936), age groups (p=0.507), stone size groups (p=0.817), and gender distribution (p=0.631). The stone clearance rate was significantly higher in patients treated with ESWLin combination with tasmsulosin therapy (92.7% vs. 65.9%; p=0.003) compared to ESWLalone. Conclusion: The clearance rate was significantly higher in patients treated with ESWL in combination with tasmsulosin therapy compared to ESWLalone.","PeriodicalId":11923,"journal":{"name":"Esculapio","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stone Clearance in Patients with Upper Ureteric Stones Using Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Compared with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Combined with Tamsulosin Therapy\",\"authors\":\"Mudessarat Rafaq, Noman Ali Ghazanfar, Obaid Ur Rehman, Fayyaz Ur Rehman Haider, Shabbar Hussain Changazi, Muhammad Shahzad Anwar\",\"doi\":\"10.51273/esc23.2519218\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To assess its role in stone clearance along with ESWLin patients with upper ureteric stones. Method: This clinical trial was conducted from February 2018 to December 2021 at the Department of Urology, Services Hospital Lahore.. Atotal of 164 patients (82 in each group) of both sexes between the ages of 18 and 70 years with upper ureteric stone (6mm-15mm) were included in this study. These patients were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in group A received ESWL alone, while patients in group B received ESWL in combination with tamsulosin therapy. Follow-up visits with CT KUB Plain were planned 4 weeks postoperatively to assess stone clearance Results: The mean age of patients was 44.01±10.88 years. The study included 124 (75.6%) male and 40 (24.4%) female patients. The mean size of stones was 9.59±2.72 mm. Both the groups were comparable in terms of mean age (p=0.539), mean stone size (p=0.936), age groups (p=0.507), stone size groups (p=0.817), and gender distribution (p=0.631). The stone clearance rate was significantly higher in patients treated with ESWLin combination with tasmsulosin therapy (92.7% vs. 65.9%; p=0.003) compared to ESWLalone. Conclusion: The clearance rate was significantly higher in patients treated with ESWL in combination with tasmsulosin therapy compared to ESWLalone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Esculapio\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Esculapio\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51273/esc23.2519218\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esculapio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51273/esc23.2519218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:探讨ESWLin在输尿管上段结石患者结石清除中的作用。方法:本临床试验于2018年2月至2021年12月在拉合尔服务医院泌尿外科进行。本研究共纳入18 ~ 70岁输尿管上段结石(6mm-15mm)患者164例(每组82例)。这些患者被随机分为两组。A组患者单独进行ESWL治疗,B组患者联合坦索罗辛治疗。术后4周行CT KUB平扫随访,评估结石清除情况。结果:患者平均年龄44.01±10.88岁。其中男性124例(75.6%),女性40例(24.4%)。结石平均大小为9.59±2.72 mm。两组在平均年龄(p=0.539)、平均结石大小(p=0.936)、年龄组(p=0.507)、结石大小组(p=0.817)和性别分布(p=0.631)方面具有可比性。ESWLin联合tasmsulosin治疗的患者结石清除率明显更高(92.7% vs. 65.9%;p=0.003)。结论:ESWL联合tasmsulosin治疗的清除率明显高于ESWL单用。
Stone Clearance in Patients with Upper Ureteric Stones Using Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Compared with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Combined with Tamsulosin Therapy
Objective: To assess its role in stone clearance along with ESWLin patients with upper ureteric stones. Method: This clinical trial was conducted from February 2018 to December 2021 at the Department of Urology, Services Hospital Lahore.. Atotal of 164 patients (82 in each group) of both sexes between the ages of 18 and 70 years with upper ureteric stone (6mm-15mm) were included in this study. These patients were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in group A received ESWL alone, while patients in group B received ESWL in combination with tamsulosin therapy. Follow-up visits with CT KUB Plain were planned 4 weeks postoperatively to assess stone clearance Results: The mean age of patients was 44.01±10.88 years. The study included 124 (75.6%) male and 40 (24.4%) female patients. The mean size of stones was 9.59±2.72 mm. Both the groups were comparable in terms of mean age (p=0.539), mean stone size (p=0.936), age groups (p=0.507), stone size groups (p=0.817), and gender distribution (p=0.631). The stone clearance rate was significantly higher in patients treated with ESWLin combination with tasmsulosin therapy (92.7% vs. 65.9%; p=0.003) compared to ESWLalone. Conclusion: The clearance rate was significantly higher in patients treated with ESWL in combination with tasmsulosin therapy compared to ESWLalone.