大学的质素标准

Aysegul Akdogan Eker
{"title":"大学的质素标准","authors":"Aysegul Akdogan Eker","doi":"10.61552/jibi.2023.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increase in the number of universities in all countries in recent years has necessitated a rethinking of the criteria for evaluating education. It is important to keep in mind that no single indicator can capture all the factors that contribute to the quality of a university and different institutions may prioritize different factors depending on their strengths and objectives. It is important to note that university quality is a multifaceted concept and cannot be assessed based on only one indicator. A comprehensive assessment of a university's quality may require consideration of multiple indicators and contextual factors in order to get a holistic picture of its overall performance. Creative and innovative thinking is at the heart of this. As a result, many different criteria emerge. Quality is undoubtedly the first criterion that comes to mind. There have been great developments in this regard in Turkey. Every institution has started to create strategic plans targeting quality. In this sense, the Higher Education Council in Turkey has taken a new step in higher education with YÖKAK (Higher Education Quality Authority). Now, all universities are subjected to external evaluation, monitoring and accreditation by preparing KIDR (Internal Evaluation Report). It is observed that this is a great quality move for our country. In this sense, YÖKAK is making efforts to realize the desired quality indicators in universities not only on a formal basis but also on the basis of practice. In this sense, YÖKAK has been working on 4 basic issues (Leadership, Governance, Quality-Education,Teaching-Education,Teaching-Research Development-Social Contribution) which are addressed in quality in all universities. A systematic structure has been established to monitor quality. Each university now has a Quality main heading on its web pages, and the studies carried out are explained to the society. Of course, these studies find an increasing place not only on the web page but also in the application areas. In this study, quality criteria in Turkish universities are explained in a basic sense and suggestions are given about what needs to be done.","PeriodicalId":499743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovations in Business and Industry","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"QUALITY CRITERIA IN UNIVERSITIES\",\"authors\":\"Aysegul Akdogan Eker\",\"doi\":\"10.61552/jibi.2023.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increase in the number of universities in all countries in recent years has necessitated a rethinking of the criteria for evaluating education. It is important to keep in mind that no single indicator can capture all the factors that contribute to the quality of a university and different institutions may prioritize different factors depending on their strengths and objectives. It is important to note that university quality is a multifaceted concept and cannot be assessed based on only one indicator. A comprehensive assessment of a university's quality may require consideration of multiple indicators and contextual factors in order to get a holistic picture of its overall performance. Creative and innovative thinking is at the heart of this. As a result, many different criteria emerge. Quality is undoubtedly the first criterion that comes to mind. There have been great developments in this regard in Turkey. Every institution has started to create strategic plans targeting quality. In this sense, the Higher Education Council in Turkey has taken a new step in higher education with YÖKAK (Higher Education Quality Authority). Now, all universities are subjected to external evaluation, monitoring and accreditation by preparing KIDR (Internal Evaluation Report). It is observed that this is a great quality move for our country. In this sense, YÖKAK is making efforts to realize the desired quality indicators in universities not only on a formal basis but also on the basis of practice. In this sense, YÖKAK has been working on 4 basic issues (Leadership, Governance, Quality-Education,Teaching-Education,Teaching-Research Development-Social Contribution) which are addressed in quality in all universities. A systematic structure has been established to monitor quality. Each university now has a Quality main heading on its web pages, and the studies carried out are explained to the society. Of course, these studies find an increasing place not only on the web page but also in the application areas. In this study, quality criteria in Turkish universities are explained in a basic sense and suggestions are given about what needs to be done.\",\"PeriodicalId\":499743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovations in Business and Industry\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovations in Business and Industry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61552/jibi.2023.02.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovations in Business and Industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61552/jibi.2023.02.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,各国大学数量的增加迫使人们重新思考评估教育的标准。重要的是要记住,没有一个单一的指标可以涵盖影响大学质量的所有因素,不同的机构可能会根据自己的优势和目标优先考虑不同的因素。值得注意的是,大学质量是一个多方面的概念,不能仅仅根据一个指标来评估。对一所大学质量的全面评估可能需要考虑多个指标和背景因素,以便全面了解其整体表现。创造性和创新性思维是其核心。因此,出现了许多不同的标准。质量无疑是人们首先想到的标准。土耳其在这方面有了很大的发展。每个机构都开始制定以质量为目标的战略计划。在这个意义上,土耳其高等教育委员会通过YÖKAK(高等教育质量管理局)在高等教育方面迈出了新的一步。现在,所有大学都要接受外部评估、监督和认证,并准备内部评估报告(KIDR)。据观察,这对我们的国家来说是一个伟大的质量举措。从这个意义上说,YÖKAK不仅在正式的基础上,而且在实践的基础上,正在努力实现大学所期望的质量指标。从这个意义上说,YÖKAK一直致力于四个基本问题(领导,治理,素质教育,教学-教育,教学-研究-发展-社会贡献),这是所有大学都要解决的质量问题。已经建立了一个系统的结构来监控质量。现在,每所大学的网页上都有一个“质量”的主要标题,并向社会解释所进行的研究。当然,这些研究不仅在网页上,而且在应用领域也越来越受到重视。在本研究中,土耳其大学的质量标准在基本意义上进行了解释,并就需要做的事情提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
QUALITY CRITERIA IN UNIVERSITIES
The increase in the number of universities in all countries in recent years has necessitated a rethinking of the criteria for evaluating education. It is important to keep in mind that no single indicator can capture all the factors that contribute to the quality of a university and different institutions may prioritize different factors depending on their strengths and objectives. It is important to note that university quality is a multifaceted concept and cannot be assessed based on only one indicator. A comprehensive assessment of a university's quality may require consideration of multiple indicators and contextual factors in order to get a holistic picture of its overall performance. Creative and innovative thinking is at the heart of this. As a result, many different criteria emerge. Quality is undoubtedly the first criterion that comes to mind. There have been great developments in this regard in Turkey. Every institution has started to create strategic plans targeting quality. In this sense, the Higher Education Council in Turkey has taken a new step in higher education with YÖKAK (Higher Education Quality Authority). Now, all universities are subjected to external evaluation, monitoring and accreditation by preparing KIDR (Internal Evaluation Report). It is observed that this is a great quality move for our country. In this sense, YÖKAK is making efforts to realize the desired quality indicators in universities not only on a formal basis but also on the basis of practice. In this sense, YÖKAK has been working on 4 basic issues (Leadership, Governance, Quality-Education,Teaching-Education,Teaching-Research Development-Social Contribution) which are addressed in quality in all universities. A systematic structure has been established to monitor quality. Each university now has a Quality main heading on its web pages, and the studies carried out are explained to the society. Of course, these studies find an increasing place not only on the web page but also in the application areas. In this study, quality criteria in Turkish universities are explained in a basic sense and suggestions are given about what needs to be done.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信