《罗马条约》序言的读者

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS
Christian Vassallo
{"title":"《罗马条约》序言的读者","authors":"Christian Vassallo","doi":"10.25162/hermes-2023-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses in-depth Proclus’ testimonium to Crantor on Plato’s Atlantis (fr. 8 Mette). The expression ἱστορία ψιλή we read in the evidence should be interpreted in light of Proclus’ effort to classify the various readings of the Atlantis story (and of Platonic myths in general). From the elements at our disposal, we may tentatively infer that Crantor upheld a metaphorical (i. e. didactic) reading not only of the creation account of the Timaeus, but of the Atlantis myth as well. This metaphorical reading did not deny the ‘truth’ of the fiction (in some way confirmed by the phrase λόγος ἀληθής in the Platonic lemma commented by Proclus), but we may guess it surely ruled out any plausibility of the ‘historicity’ of the Atlantis story.","PeriodicalId":44574,"journal":{"name":"HERMES-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLASSISCHE PHILOLOGIE","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crantore lettore del prologo del Timeo: Il fr. 8 Mette tra decostruzione ed ermeneutica\",\"authors\":\"Christian Vassallo\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/hermes-2023-0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyses in-depth Proclus’ testimonium to Crantor on Plato’s Atlantis (fr. 8 Mette). The expression ἱστορία ψιλή we read in the evidence should be interpreted in light of Proclus’ effort to classify the various readings of the Atlantis story (and of Platonic myths in general). From the elements at our disposal, we may tentatively infer that Crantor upheld a metaphorical (i. e. didactic) reading not only of the creation account of the Timaeus, but of the Atlantis myth as well. This metaphorical reading did not deny the ‘truth’ of the fiction (in some way confirmed by the phrase λόγος ἀληθής in the Platonic lemma commented by Proclus), but we may guess it surely ruled out any plausibility of the ‘historicity’ of the Atlantis story.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HERMES-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLASSISCHE PHILOLOGIE\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HERMES-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLASSISCHE PHILOLOGIE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/hermes-2023-0034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HERMES-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLASSISCHE PHILOLOGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/hermes-2023-0034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文深入分析了普罗克劳斯给克兰托关于柏拉图的《亚特兰蒂斯》的证言。我们在证据中读到的表达式υ στορ α ψιλή应该根据普罗克洛斯对亚特兰蒂斯故事(以及一般柏拉图神话)的各种解读进行分类的努力来解释。从我们掌握的元素中,我们可以初步推断,克兰托支持一种隐喻(即说教)的阅读,不仅是对蒂迈乌斯的创造描述,而且对亚特兰蒂斯神话也是如此。这种隐喻性的阅读并没有否认小说的“真相”(在某种程度上由普罗克罗斯评论的柏拉图引理中的短语λ γος ς ληθ记载ς所证实),但我们可以猜测它肯定排除了亚特兰蒂斯故事的“历史性”的任何合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crantore lettore del prologo del Timeo: Il fr. 8 Mette tra decostruzione ed ermeneutica
This paper analyses in-depth Proclus’ testimonium to Crantor on Plato’s Atlantis (fr. 8 Mette). The expression ἱστορία ψιλή we read in the evidence should be interpreted in light of Proclus’ effort to classify the various readings of the Atlantis story (and of Platonic myths in general). From the elements at our disposal, we may tentatively infer that Crantor upheld a metaphorical (i. e. didactic) reading not only of the creation account of the Timaeus, but of the Atlantis myth as well. This metaphorical reading did not deny the ‘truth’ of the fiction (in some way confirmed by the phrase λόγος ἀληθής in the Platonic lemma commented by Proclus), but we may guess it surely ruled out any plausibility of the ‘historicity’ of the Atlantis story.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信