三种实践模式:对图书馆社会工作者在危机中扮演的降级角色的影响

IF 1 4区 管理学 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Mary A. Provence
{"title":"三种实践模式:对图书馆社会工作者在危机中扮演的降级角色的影响","authors":"Mary A. Provence","doi":"10.1080/24750158.2023.2262074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTHeretofore, models of library social work have primarily been described in terms of the employment status of the social worker (full or part time, employed by library or agency, etc.) rather than the programmatic structure of the services. This research study identifies and describes three different models of public library social work practice: The Signup and Summon Model; The Outreach and Summon Model, and the Social Work Center Model. Next, it explains how each model impacts the de-escalation role of the social worker during crises with patrons experiencing homelessness. The perceived impact of the social worker’s de-escalation role included patrons experiencing homelessness being less likely to interact with security and police and less likely to be excluded, arrested, or jailed. Using an embedded multiple-case study approach, the larger study from which this study is drawn spanned across three United States’ urban libraries with 107 distinct participants, 91 surveys and 46 in-depth interviews. Taking a comprehensive look at the role of social workers during the crisis, the views of six different roles are included: patrons experiencing homelessness, front-facing library staff, library police/security, chief executive officers, branch managers, and social workers.KEYWORDS: Crisisde-escalationhomelessnesslibrary social work Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 This author chose the term ‘people experiencing homelessness’ as it is recommended by the American Psychological Association (APA) style guidelines (APA, Citation2020, p. 148) and was used in the data collection instruments. The author is also aware that there is no consensus around the use of this term. In the use of this term, it was the author’s intent to emphasize personhood and avoid objectification.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMary A. ProvenceMary A. Provence, PhD is an Assistant Teaching Professor of Social Work at Ball State University and is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker. In her early career, she spent four years as an outreach social worker on the streets of Indianapolis with youth experiencing homelessness. With 31 years of practice across the micro and macro spectrum, Mary is an avid researcher of the emerging field of public library social work as a response to homelessness.","PeriodicalId":53976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three Models of Practice: Impacts on the De-escalation Role of Library Social Workers During Crises with Patrons Experiencing Homelessness\",\"authors\":\"Mary A. Provence\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24750158.2023.2262074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTHeretofore, models of library social work have primarily been described in terms of the employment status of the social worker (full or part time, employed by library or agency, etc.) rather than the programmatic structure of the services. This research study identifies and describes three different models of public library social work practice: The Signup and Summon Model; The Outreach and Summon Model, and the Social Work Center Model. Next, it explains how each model impacts the de-escalation role of the social worker during crises with patrons experiencing homelessness. The perceived impact of the social worker’s de-escalation role included patrons experiencing homelessness being less likely to interact with security and police and less likely to be excluded, arrested, or jailed. Using an embedded multiple-case study approach, the larger study from which this study is drawn spanned across three United States’ urban libraries with 107 distinct participants, 91 surveys and 46 in-depth interviews. Taking a comprehensive look at the role of social workers during the crisis, the views of six different roles are included: patrons experiencing homelessness, front-facing library staff, library police/security, chief executive officers, branch managers, and social workers.KEYWORDS: Crisisde-escalationhomelessnesslibrary social work Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 This author chose the term ‘people experiencing homelessness’ as it is recommended by the American Psychological Association (APA) style guidelines (APA, Citation2020, p. 148) and was used in the data collection instruments. The author is also aware that there is no consensus around the use of this term. In the use of this term, it was the author’s intent to emphasize personhood and avoid objectification.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMary A. ProvenceMary A. Provence, PhD is an Assistant Teaching Professor of Social Work at Ball State University and is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker. In her early career, she spent four years as an outreach social worker on the streets of Indianapolis with youth experiencing homelessness. With 31 years of practice across the micro and macro spectrum, Mary is an avid researcher of the emerging field of public library social work as a response to homelessness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2023.2262074\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2023.2262074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

因此,图书馆社会工作的模式主要是根据社会工作者的就业状况(全职或兼职,受雇于图书馆或代理机构等)来描述的,而不是服务的程序化结构。本研究确定并描述了公共图书馆社会工作实践的三种不同模式:报名与召唤模式;外展和召集模式,以及社会工作中心模式。接下来,它解释了每个模型如何影响社会工作者在危机中与无家可归的顾客的降级角色。社会工作者的降级作用的感知影响包括,经历无家可归的顾客不太可能与安全和警察互动,也不太可能被排斥、逮捕或监禁。采用嵌入式多案例研究方法,本研究的大型研究跨越了美国三个城市图书馆,有107个不同的参与者,91次调查和46次深度访谈。全面审视危机中社会工作者的角色,包括六个不同角色的观点:无家可归的顾客、图书馆前台工作人员、图书馆警察/保安、首席执行官、分馆经理和社会工作者。关键词:危机升级无家可归者图书馆社会工作披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1本作者选择“无家可归的人”一词,是因为它是美国心理协会(APA)风格指南(APA, Citation2020, p. 148)推荐的,并用于数据收集工具。作者也意识到,对于这个术语的使用并没有达成共识。在使用这个术语时,作者的意图是强调人格,避免物化。作者简介:mary a . Provence mary a . Provence,博士,波尔州立大学社会工作助理教授,执业临床社会工作者。在她早期的职业生涯中,她在印第安纳波利斯的街道上做了四年的外展社会工作者,帮助那些无家可归的年轻人。凭借31年的微观和宏观领域的实践,玛丽是公共图书馆社会工作作为对无家可归者的回应的新兴领域的热心研究者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three Models of Practice: Impacts on the De-escalation Role of Library Social Workers During Crises with Patrons Experiencing Homelessness
ABSTRACTHeretofore, models of library social work have primarily been described in terms of the employment status of the social worker (full or part time, employed by library or agency, etc.) rather than the programmatic structure of the services. This research study identifies and describes three different models of public library social work practice: The Signup and Summon Model; The Outreach and Summon Model, and the Social Work Center Model. Next, it explains how each model impacts the de-escalation role of the social worker during crises with patrons experiencing homelessness. The perceived impact of the social worker’s de-escalation role included patrons experiencing homelessness being less likely to interact with security and police and less likely to be excluded, arrested, or jailed. Using an embedded multiple-case study approach, the larger study from which this study is drawn spanned across three United States’ urban libraries with 107 distinct participants, 91 surveys and 46 in-depth interviews. Taking a comprehensive look at the role of social workers during the crisis, the views of six different roles are included: patrons experiencing homelessness, front-facing library staff, library police/security, chief executive officers, branch managers, and social workers.KEYWORDS: Crisisde-escalationhomelessnesslibrary social work Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 This author chose the term ‘people experiencing homelessness’ as it is recommended by the American Psychological Association (APA) style guidelines (APA, Citation2020, p. 148) and was used in the data collection instruments. The author is also aware that there is no consensus around the use of this term. In the use of this term, it was the author’s intent to emphasize personhood and avoid objectification.Additional informationNotes on contributorsMary A. ProvenceMary A. Provence, PhD is an Assistant Teaching Professor of Social Work at Ball State University and is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker. In her early career, she spent four years as an outreach social worker on the streets of Indianapolis with youth experiencing homelessness. With 31 years of practice across the micro and macro spectrum, Mary is an avid researcher of the emerging field of public library social work as a response to homelessness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association is the flagship journal of the Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA). It is a quarterly publication for information science researchers, information professionals, related disciplines and industries. The Journal aims to stimulate discussion and inform practice by showcasing original peer reviewed research articles and other scholarly papers about, or relevant to, the Australian and Southern Asia Pacific regions. Authors from the full range of information professions and areas of scholarship are invited to contribute their work to the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信