尼日利亚和印度劳工实践与法律的比较研究

Q2 Social Sciences

Global Journal of Comparative Law Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1163/2211906x-12030005

Adetutu Deborah Aina-Pelemo

{"title":"尼日利亚和印度劳工实践与法律的比较研究","authors":"Adetutu Deborah Aina-Pelemo","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-12030005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Labour practices include workplace routines like, the conditions of employment, remuneration, trade union, industrial relations, safety and welfare of workers, labour rights and responsibilities, etc. Labour relations are laced with both fair and unfair practices. This study examines the differences and similarities of labour practices in Nigerian and Indian industries, and how their respective courts interpreted their labour laws. The doctrinal research methodology involving systematic review of current legal propositions, cases, statutes, legislation, policies relating to labour practice in Nigeria and India was adopted. The study finds amongst others that both the Nigerian and Indian Labour industries are fraught with unfair labour practices and the rights of workers are the same, but India explicitly provides imprisonment for employer found guilty of unfair labour practices, and Nigerian labour legislation is silent on that. It concludes by recommending a review of Nigerian labour practice legal framework, reflecting some India’s advancement in labour practice.","PeriodicalId":38000,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Selected Nigerian and Indian Labour Practices and the Law\",\"authors\":\"Adetutu Deborah Aina-Pelemo\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/2211906x-12030005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Labour practices include workplace routines like, the conditions of employment, remuneration, trade union, industrial relations, safety and welfare of workers, labour rights and responsibilities, etc. Labour relations are laced with both fair and unfair practices. This study examines the differences and similarities of labour practices in Nigerian and Indian industries, and how their respective courts interpreted their labour laws. The doctrinal research methodology involving systematic review of current legal propositions, cases, statutes, legislation, policies relating to labour practice in Nigeria and India was adopted. The study finds amongst others that both the Nigerian and Indian Labour industries are fraught with unfair labour practices and the rights of workers are the same, but India explicitly provides imprisonment for employer found guilty of unfair labour practices, and Nigerian labour legislation is silent on that. It concludes by recommending a review of Nigerian labour practice legal framework, reflecting some India’s advancement in labour practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Comparative Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906x-12030005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906x-12030005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

抽象劳动实践包括工作场所的日常事务，如就业条件、薪酬、工会、劳资关系、工人的安全和福利、劳工权利和责任等。劳资关系中既有公平的做法，也有不公平的做法。本研究考察了尼日利亚和印度工业劳工实践的异同，以及各自的法院如何解释其劳动法。通过了理论研究方法，包括系统地审查尼日利亚和印度有关劳工实践的现行法律主张、案件、法规、立法和政策。该研究发现，尼日利亚和印度的劳工行业都充满了不公平的劳动行为，工人的权利是一样的，但印度明确规定，对被发现犯有不公平劳动行为的雇主处以监禁，而尼日利亚的劳工立法对此保持沉默。报告最后建议审查尼日利亚劳工实践法律框架，反映印度在劳工实践方面的一些进步。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparative Study of Selected Nigerian and Indian Labour Practices and the Law

Abstract Labour practices include workplace routines like, the conditions of employment, remuneration, trade union, industrial relations, safety and welfare of workers, labour rights and responsibilities, etc. Labour relations are laced with both fair and unfair practices. This study examines the differences and similarities of labour practices in Nigerian and Indian industries, and how their respective courts interpreted their labour laws. The doctrinal research methodology involving systematic review of current legal propositions, cases, statutes, legislation, policies relating to labour practice in Nigeria and India was adopted. The study finds amongst others that both the Nigerian and Indian Labour industries are fraught with unfair labour practices and the rights of workers are the same, but India explicitly provides imprisonment for employer found guilty of unfair labour practices, and Nigerian labour legislation is silent on that. It concludes by recommending a review of Nigerian labour practice legal framework, reflecting some India’s advancement in labour practice.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Global Journal of Comparative Law Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Global Journal of Comparative Law is a peer reviewed periodical that provides a dynamic platform for the dissemination of ideas on comparative law and reports on developments in the field of comparative law from all parts of the world. In our contemporary globalized world, it is almost impossible to isolate developments in the law in one jurisdiction or society from another. At the same time, what is traditionally called comparative law is increasingly subsumed under aspects of International Law. The Global Journal of Comparative Law therefore aims to maintain the discipline of comparative legal studies as vigorous and dynamic by deepening the space for comparative work in its transnational context.