数字经济能减少碳排放吗?技术创新和贸易开放的作用

IF 4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Qiang Wang, Xinchen Cheng, Rongrong Li
{"title":"数字经济能减少碳排放吗?技术创新和贸易开放的作用","authors":"Qiang Wang, Xinchen Cheng, Rongrong Li","doi":"10.1177/0958305x231196127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to better understand the digital economy on carbon emissions, the intermediary effect model based on technological innovation and the panel threshold model based on trade openness and energy intensity are used to study the relationship between the digital economy and carbon emissions in G7 countries. In addition, a quantile regression analysis on the impact of the digital economy under different carbon emission levels is also conducted. The empirical results show that: (i) the digital economy has a significant inhibitory effect on per capita carbon emissions. (ii) The mechanism analysis shows that the digital economy can indirectly affect per capita carbon emissions by affecting technological innovation. (iii) The threshold effect of trade openness and energy intensity is significant. Under high openness and low energy intensity, the digital economy has a stronger inhibitory effect on per capita carbon emissions. (iv) The quantile regression results show that the carbon emission reduction effect of the digital economy is greater at the low-carbon emission level.","PeriodicalId":11652,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the digital economy reduce carbon emissions? The role of technological innovation and trade openness\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Wang, Xinchen Cheng, Rongrong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0958305x231196127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to better understand the digital economy on carbon emissions, the intermediary effect model based on technological innovation and the panel threshold model based on trade openness and energy intensity are used to study the relationship between the digital economy and carbon emissions in G7 countries. In addition, a quantile regression analysis on the impact of the digital economy under different carbon emission levels is also conducted. The empirical results show that: (i) the digital economy has a significant inhibitory effect on per capita carbon emissions. (ii) The mechanism analysis shows that the digital economy can indirectly affect per capita carbon emissions by affecting technological innovation. (iii) The threshold effect of trade openness and energy intensity is significant. Under high openness and low energy intensity, the digital economy has a stronger inhibitory effect on per capita carbon emissions. (iv) The quantile regression results show that the carbon emission reduction effect of the digital economy is greater at the low-carbon emission level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231196127\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231196127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了更好地理解数字经济对碳排放的影响,本文采用基于技术创新的中介效应模型和基于贸易开放程度和能源强度的面板阈值模型对G7国家的数字经济与碳排放的关系进行了研究。此外,本文还对不同碳排放水平下数字经济的影响进行了分位数回归分析。实证结果表明:(1)数字经济对人均碳排放具有显著的抑制作用。(2)机制分析表明,数字经济可以通过影响技术创新间接影响人均碳排放。(三)贸易开放与能源强度的门槛效应显著。在高开放、低能源强度的条件下,数字经济对人均碳排放的抑制作用更强。(四)分位数回归结果显示,在低碳排放水平上,数字经济的碳减排效果更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the digital economy reduce carbon emissions? The role of technological innovation and trade openness
In order to better understand the digital economy on carbon emissions, the intermediary effect model based on technological innovation and the panel threshold model based on trade openness and energy intensity are used to study the relationship between the digital economy and carbon emissions in G7 countries. In addition, a quantile regression analysis on the impact of the digital economy under different carbon emission levels is also conducted. The empirical results show that: (i) the digital economy has a significant inhibitory effect on per capita carbon emissions. (ii) The mechanism analysis shows that the digital economy can indirectly affect per capita carbon emissions by affecting technological innovation. (iii) The threshold effect of trade openness and energy intensity is significant. Under high openness and low energy intensity, the digital economy has a stronger inhibitory effect on per capita carbon emissions. (iv) The quantile regression results show that the carbon emission reduction effect of the digital economy is greater at the low-carbon emission level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Environment
Energy & Environment ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Energy & Environment is an interdisciplinary journal inviting energy policy analysts, natural scientists and engineers, as well as lawyers and economists to contribute to mutual understanding and learning, believing that better communication between experts will enhance the quality of policy, advance social well-being and help to reduce conflict. The journal encourages dialogue between the social sciences as energy demand and supply are observed and analysed with reference to politics of policy-making and implementation. The rapidly evolving social and environmental impacts of energy supply, transport, production and use at all levels require contribution from many disciplines if policy is to be effective. In particular E & E invite contributions from the study of policy delivery, ultimately more important than policy formation. The geopolitics of energy are also important, as are the impacts of environmental regulations and advancing technologies on national and local politics, and even global energy politics. Energy & Environment is a forum for constructive, professional information sharing, as well as debate across disciplines and professions, including the financial sector. Mathematical articles are outside the scope of Energy & Environment. The broader policy implications of submitted research should be addressed and environmental implications, not just emission quantities, be discussed with reference to scientific assumptions. This applies especially to technical papers based on arguments suggested by other disciplines, funding bodies or directly by policy-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信