{"title":"线形陶文化的房屋单位?","authors":"Daniel Pilař, Petr Květina","doi":"10.35686/ar.2023.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to critically evaluate the existing approach toward the Linear Pottery culture (LBK) settlement space in terms of the character of the pits, their fill and pottery decoration style. It is traditionally and implicitly assumed that the pits in the vicinity of a house (so-called house unit) are of the same period of formation, filling, and demise, so their testimony is usually considered comparable. However, research into the formative processes of ceramic material from pits with a spatial association to the house no. 88 in Bylany near Kutná Hora (CZ) shows that individual features differ significantly in terms of structure, and each in its own way is taphonomically unique. At the same time, formative processes have a strong influence on our current perception of the decorative style of Neolithic pottery and its relative chronology. The house unit thus becomes an optimistic assumption in the case of multiphase settlements, which cannot be applied without a better understanding of archaeological sources.","PeriodicalId":328656,"journal":{"name":"Archeologické rozhledy","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"House unit of the Linear Pottery culture?\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Pilař, Petr Květina\",\"doi\":\"10.35686/ar.2023.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the article is to critically evaluate the existing approach toward the Linear Pottery culture (LBK) settlement space in terms of the character of the pits, their fill and pottery decoration style. It is traditionally and implicitly assumed that the pits in the vicinity of a house (so-called house unit) are of the same period of formation, filling, and demise, so their testimony is usually considered comparable. However, research into the formative processes of ceramic material from pits with a spatial association to the house no. 88 in Bylany near Kutná Hora (CZ) shows that individual features differ significantly in terms of structure, and each in its own way is taphonomically unique. At the same time, formative processes have a strong influence on our current perception of the decorative style of Neolithic pottery and its relative chronology. The house unit thus becomes an optimistic assumption in the case of multiphase settlements, which cannot be applied without a better understanding of archaeological sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":328656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archeologické rozhledy\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archeologické rozhledy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35686/ar.2023.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archeologické rozhledy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35686/ar.2023.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文的目的是从坑的特征、坑的填充物和陶器的装饰风格等方面,批判性地评价现有的线性陶文化(LBK)聚落空间方法。传统和隐含的假设是,房屋附近的坑(所谓的房屋单位)是在同一时期形成,填充和消亡的,因此它们的证词通常被认为是可比的。然而,对陶瓷材料的形成过程的研究,从具有空间关联的坑到房子的编号。kutn Hora (CZ)附近的Bylany(88)的研究表明,就结构而言,个体特征差异很大,每种特征在音标学上都是独特的。与此同时,形成过程对我们目前对新石器时代陶器装饰风格及其相关年代的看法产生了强烈的影响。因此,在多阶段定居点的情况下,住宅单元成为一种乐观的假设,如果没有更好地了解考古来源,就无法应用。
The aim of the article is to critically evaluate the existing approach toward the Linear Pottery culture (LBK) settlement space in terms of the character of the pits, their fill and pottery decoration style. It is traditionally and implicitly assumed that the pits in the vicinity of a house (so-called house unit) are of the same period of formation, filling, and demise, so their testimony is usually considered comparable. However, research into the formative processes of ceramic material from pits with a spatial association to the house no. 88 in Bylany near Kutná Hora (CZ) shows that individual features differ significantly in terms of structure, and each in its own way is taphonomically unique. At the same time, formative processes have a strong influence on our current perception of the decorative style of Neolithic pottery and its relative chronology. The house unit thus becomes an optimistic assumption in the case of multiphase settlements, which cannot be applied without a better understanding of archaeological sources.