生产系统与环境和社会经济可持续性:米纳斯吉拉斯州奶牛场的比较

Q4 Social Sciences
Marcelo Rodrigues Martins, Alain Hernández Santoyo, Eduardo Gomes Salgado, Marcelo Lacerda Rezende
{"title":"生产系统与环境和社会经济可持续性:米纳斯吉拉斯州奶牛场的比较","authors":"Marcelo Rodrigues Martins, Alain Hernández Santoyo, Eduardo Gomes Salgado, Marcelo Lacerda Rezende","doi":"10.24857/rgsa.v17n9-018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Analyse the differences in sustainability performance between pasture and confined dairy farms located south of Minas Gerais state. Theoretical framework: It is observed in the literature that the effects of the intensification of dairy production on the three pillars of sustainability are not completely clear, depending on specific locations of production systems and requiring further studies. Method: The performance of six properties in the pasture system and six properties in the confined system was analysed using the Sustainability Indicator in Agro ecosystems (ISA), which uses a set of 21 other indicators grouped into seven sub-indexes involving socioeconomic and environmental dimensions. Results and conclusion: Environmental balance was the dimension with the lowest average final index of the 12 properties; this is explained probably by producers' increased attention to economic and social issues, especially concerning labour inspection. Environmental issues, even with the high interest of society in recent years, do not receive attention with the same intensity as others. Comparing the indicators of the two production systems, productivity was the only one that presented a statistically significant difference, using the Mann-Whitney U test. Research implications: With the survey for calculating the indicators, it was possible to understand the relationship between productivity and socioeconomic and environmental sustainability, in addition to presenting solutions to improve the adequacy of the properties, with actions that will mitigate the vulnerabilities of the properties studied. Originality/value: A better understanding of the effects of increased productivity on the socioeconomic and environmental sustainability of dairy farms.","PeriodicalId":38210,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Production Systems and Environmental and Socioeconomic Sustainability: Comparison Between Dairy Farms in Minas Gerais\",\"authors\":\"Marcelo Rodrigues Martins, Alain Hernández Santoyo, Eduardo Gomes Salgado, Marcelo Lacerda Rezende\",\"doi\":\"10.24857/rgsa.v17n9-018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Analyse the differences in sustainability performance between pasture and confined dairy farms located south of Minas Gerais state. Theoretical framework: It is observed in the literature that the effects of the intensification of dairy production on the three pillars of sustainability are not completely clear, depending on specific locations of production systems and requiring further studies. Method: The performance of six properties in the pasture system and six properties in the confined system was analysed using the Sustainability Indicator in Agro ecosystems (ISA), which uses a set of 21 other indicators grouped into seven sub-indexes involving socioeconomic and environmental dimensions. Results and conclusion: Environmental balance was the dimension with the lowest average final index of the 12 properties; this is explained probably by producers' increased attention to economic and social issues, especially concerning labour inspection. Environmental issues, even with the high interest of society in recent years, do not receive attention with the same intensity as others. Comparing the indicators of the two production systems, productivity was the only one that presented a statistically significant difference, using the Mann-Whitney U test. Research implications: With the survey for calculating the indicators, it was possible to understand the relationship between productivity and socioeconomic and environmental sustainability, in addition to presenting solutions to improve the adequacy of the properties, with actions that will mitigate the vulnerabilities of the properties studied. Originality/value: A better understanding of the effects of increased productivity on the socioeconomic and environmental sustainability of dairy farms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n9-018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n9-018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析位于米纳斯吉拉斯州南部的牧场和封闭式奶牛场在可持续发展绩效方面的差异。理论框架:在文献中观察到,乳制品生产集约化对可持续性三大支柱的影响并不完全清楚,这取决于生产系统的具体位置,需要进一步研究。方法:采用农业生态系统可持续性指标(ISA)对放牧系统和封闭系统中6个特性的表现进行分析,ISA使用了包括社会经济和环境维度在内的7个子指标的21个其他指标。结果与结论:环境平衡是12个属性中平均最终指数最低的维度;这可能是由于生产者越来越关注经济和社会问题,特别是劳动监察。环境问题,即使是近年来社会高度关注的问题,也没有像其他问题那样受到同等程度的关注。采用Mann-Whitney U检验,比较两种生产系统的指标,生产率是唯一呈现统计学显著差异的指标。研究意义:通过计算指标的调查,可以了解生产力与社会经济和环境可持续性之间的关系,除了提出解决方案以提高属性的充分性,并采取行动减轻所研究属性的脆弱性。原创性/价值:更好地理解提高生产力对奶牛场社会经济和环境可持续性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Production Systems and Environmental and Socioeconomic Sustainability: Comparison Between Dairy Farms in Minas Gerais
Objective: Analyse the differences in sustainability performance between pasture and confined dairy farms located south of Minas Gerais state. Theoretical framework: It is observed in the literature that the effects of the intensification of dairy production on the three pillars of sustainability are not completely clear, depending on specific locations of production systems and requiring further studies. Method: The performance of six properties in the pasture system and six properties in the confined system was analysed using the Sustainability Indicator in Agro ecosystems (ISA), which uses a set of 21 other indicators grouped into seven sub-indexes involving socioeconomic and environmental dimensions. Results and conclusion: Environmental balance was the dimension with the lowest average final index of the 12 properties; this is explained probably by producers' increased attention to economic and social issues, especially concerning labour inspection. Environmental issues, even with the high interest of society in recent years, do not receive attention with the same intensity as others. Comparing the indicators of the two production systems, productivity was the only one that presented a statistically significant difference, using the Mann-Whitney U test. Research implications: With the survey for calculating the indicators, it was possible to understand the relationship between productivity and socioeconomic and environmental sustainability, in addition to presenting solutions to improve the adequacy of the properties, with actions that will mitigate the vulnerabilities of the properties studied. Originality/value: A better understanding of the effects of increased productivity on the socioeconomic and environmental sustainability of dairy farms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental
Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信