内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)在胃肠道病变治疗中的应用-单中心经验。

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Wojciech Ciesielski, Tomasz Klimczak, Adam Durczyński, Piotr Hogendorf, Janusz Strzelczyk
{"title":"内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)在胃肠道病变治疗中的应用-单中心经验。","authors":"Wojciech Ciesielski, Tomasz Klimczak, Adam Durczyński, Piotr Hogendorf, Janusz Strzelczyk","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.8845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionEndoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tract lesions, originating from Japan, is becoming more frequently used in European countries. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ensure minimally invasive removal of benign, premalignant and early neoplastic tumours of esophageus, stomach and intestine in selected group of patients.AimAim of this study was to determine the outcomes, radical resection rate (R0) and complication rate of ESD procedures performed in our department. Material and methodsThe data from 100 ESD procedures of esophageal, gastric, duodenal and colorectal lesions performed in out unit between 02.01.2020 and 30.06.2023 was collected and analysed retrospectively. Results42 male and 58 female patients in the median age of 64 years old (ranging 31 – 89 yo) underwent ESD. Mean duration of the procedure was 66 minutes (ranging 25 – 185 minutes). Tumours were located in oesophagus in 8 cases (8%), stomach in 25 cases (25%), duodenum in 1 case (1%) and colon in 66 cases (66%). Radical resection was achieved in 98 cases (98%) - 2 patients were qualified for surgical treatment Average size of dissection lesions was 26 x 19 mm. The biggest one was 60 x 60 mm (sigmoid adenoma) and smallest one was 5 x 5 mm (GNET). Complication occurred in 10 patients (10%) – 9 perforations of the wall of intestine (9%) and 1 hamorrhage, which required endoscopic intervention (1%). ConclusionsWith proper qualification, ESD is effective and safe method of treatment for benign, premalignant and early neoplastic lesions of gastrointestinal tract in hands of experienced endoscopists. Following current guidelines satisfying outcomes, comparable with leading center, can be achieved.","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in treatment of gastrointestinal lesions- single center experience.\",\"authors\":\"Wojciech Ciesielski, Tomasz Klimczak, Adam Durczyński, Piotr Hogendorf, Janusz Strzelczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0053.8845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionEndoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tract lesions, originating from Japan, is becoming more frequently used in European countries. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ensure minimally invasive removal of benign, premalignant and early neoplastic tumours of esophageus, stomach and intestine in selected group of patients.AimAim of this study was to determine the outcomes, radical resection rate (R0) and complication rate of ESD procedures performed in our department. Material and methodsThe data from 100 ESD procedures of esophageal, gastric, duodenal and colorectal lesions performed in out unit between 02.01.2020 and 30.06.2023 was collected and analysed retrospectively. Results42 male and 58 female patients in the median age of 64 years old (ranging 31 – 89 yo) underwent ESD. Mean duration of the procedure was 66 minutes (ranging 25 – 185 minutes). Tumours were located in oesophagus in 8 cases (8%), stomach in 25 cases (25%), duodenum in 1 case (1%) and colon in 66 cases (66%). Radical resection was achieved in 98 cases (98%) - 2 patients were qualified for surgical treatment Average size of dissection lesions was 26 x 19 mm. The biggest one was 60 x 60 mm (sigmoid adenoma) and smallest one was 5 x 5 mm (GNET). Complication occurred in 10 patients (10%) – 9 perforations of the wall of intestine (9%) and 1 hamorrhage, which required endoscopic intervention (1%). ConclusionsWith proper qualification, ESD is effective and safe method of treatment for benign, premalignant and early neoplastic lesions of gastrointestinal tract in hands of experienced endoscopists. Following current guidelines satisfying outcomes, comparable with leading center, can be achieved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.8845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.8845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内镜下胃肠道病变切除术起源于日本,在欧洲国家越来越常用。内镜下粘膜切除术(EMR)和内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)确保了选定患者组的食管、胃和肠良性、癌前和早期肿瘤的微创切除。本研究的目的是了解我科ESD手术的预后、根治率(R0)和并发症发生率。材料与方法回顾性分析我院自2020年1月2日至2023年6月30日收治的100例食管、胃、十二指肠和结直肠病变ESD手术资料。结果男性42例,女性58例,中位年龄64岁,年龄31 ~ 89岁。手术平均持续时间为66分钟(25 - 185分钟)。肿瘤位于食道8例(8%),胃25例(25%),十二指肠1例(1%),结肠66例(66%)。98例(98%)成功根治性切除,2例符合手术条件,解剖病变平均大小为26 × 19 mm。最大的为60 × 60mm(乙状结肠腺瘤),最小的为5 × 5mm (GNET)。10例(10%)患者出现并发症,其中9例(9%)出现肠壁穿孔,1例(1%)出现出血,需要内镜干预。结论在经验丰富的内镜医师的指导下,ESD是一种安全有效的治疗胃肠道良性、癌前及早期肿瘤病变的方法。按照目前的指导方针,可以获得与指导中心相当的满意结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in treatment of gastrointestinal lesions- single center experience.
IntroductionEndoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tract lesions, originating from Japan, is becoming more frequently used in European countries. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ensure minimally invasive removal of benign, premalignant and early neoplastic tumours of esophageus, stomach and intestine in selected group of patients.AimAim of this study was to determine the outcomes, radical resection rate (R0) and complication rate of ESD procedures performed in our department. Material and methodsThe data from 100 ESD procedures of esophageal, gastric, duodenal and colorectal lesions performed in out unit between 02.01.2020 and 30.06.2023 was collected and analysed retrospectively. Results42 male and 58 female patients in the median age of 64 years old (ranging 31 – 89 yo) underwent ESD. Mean duration of the procedure was 66 minutes (ranging 25 – 185 minutes). Tumours were located in oesophagus in 8 cases (8%), stomach in 25 cases (25%), duodenum in 1 case (1%) and colon in 66 cases (66%). Radical resection was achieved in 98 cases (98%) - 2 patients were qualified for surgical treatment Average size of dissection lesions was 26 x 19 mm. The biggest one was 60 x 60 mm (sigmoid adenoma) and smallest one was 5 x 5 mm (GNET). Complication occurred in 10 patients (10%) – 9 perforations of the wall of intestine (9%) and 1 hamorrhage, which required endoscopic intervention (1%). ConclusionsWith proper qualification, ESD is effective and safe method of treatment for benign, premalignant and early neoplastic lesions of gastrointestinal tract in hands of experienced endoscopists. Following current guidelines satisfying outcomes, comparable with leading center, can be achieved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信