社交媒体用户对算法新闻个性化的担忧

IF 0.3 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Sociologija Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2298/soc2303435n
Danka Ninkovic-Slavnic, Snjezana Milivojevic
{"title":"社交媒体用户对算法新闻个性化的担忧","authors":"Danka Ninkovic-Slavnic, Snjezana Milivojevic","doi":"10.2298/soc2303435n","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper asks if social media users are concerned regarding algorithmic news personalisation and how their concerns connect with other factors. We took the influential concepts of echo chambers and filter bubbles as a starting point to explore three dimensions of concern about news personalisation: missing important information, missing opposite opinions and jeopardizing privacy because of personalised news. The survey among social media news users (N=1481) shows that concern exists, but more than a third of users do not have an evident attitude regarding news personalisation. Additionally, the concern is connected with knowledge about the algorithmic selection process, the importance of social networks in users? media repertoire and, to a small extent, negative attitude towards the selection principle. The findings contribute to our understanding of users? perspectives on news personalisation which is particulary relevant considering the increasing use of personalised news and the fact that it is individual citizens? responsibility to be accurately and comprehensively informed in a media environment where the news content is fragmented.","PeriodicalId":43515,"journal":{"name":"Sociologija","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social media users’ concerns regarding algorithmic news personalisation\",\"authors\":\"Danka Ninkovic-Slavnic, Snjezana Milivojevic\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/soc2303435n\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper asks if social media users are concerned regarding algorithmic news personalisation and how their concerns connect with other factors. We took the influential concepts of echo chambers and filter bubbles as a starting point to explore three dimensions of concern about news personalisation: missing important information, missing opposite opinions and jeopardizing privacy because of personalised news. The survey among social media news users (N=1481) shows that concern exists, but more than a third of users do not have an evident attitude regarding news personalisation. Additionally, the concern is connected with knowledge about the algorithmic selection process, the importance of social networks in users? media repertoire and, to a small extent, negative attitude towards the selection principle. The findings contribute to our understanding of users? perspectives on news personalisation which is particulary relevant considering the increasing use of personalised news and the fact that it is individual citizens? responsibility to be accurately and comprehensively informed in a media environment where the news content is fragmented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociologija\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociologija\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/soc2303435n\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/soc2303435n","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该论文询问社交媒体用户是否担心算法新闻个性化,以及他们的担忧如何与其他因素联系起来。我们以“回音室”和“过滤气泡”这两个有影响力的概念为出发点,探讨了人们对新闻个性化关注的三个维度:重要信息缺失、相反观点缺失和个性化新闻对隐私的危害。对社交媒体新闻用户(N=1481)的调查显示,这种担忧是存在的,但超过三分之一的用户对新闻个性化没有明显的态度。此外,这种关注与算法选择过程的知识有关,社交网络对用户的重要性?媒体的曲目,在小程度上,消极态度的选择原则。这些发现有助于我们对用户的理解。考虑到个性化新闻的使用越来越多,以及它是个体公民的事实,对新闻个性化的看法特别相关?在新闻内容碎片化的媒体环境中,有责任准确、全面地获取信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social media users’ concerns regarding algorithmic news personalisation
The paper asks if social media users are concerned regarding algorithmic news personalisation and how their concerns connect with other factors. We took the influential concepts of echo chambers and filter bubbles as a starting point to explore three dimensions of concern about news personalisation: missing important information, missing opposite opinions and jeopardizing privacy because of personalised news. The survey among social media news users (N=1481) shows that concern exists, but more than a third of users do not have an evident attitude regarding news personalisation. Additionally, the concern is connected with knowledge about the algorithmic selection process, the importance of social networks in users? media repertoire and, to a small extent, negative attitude towards the selection principle. The findings contribute to our understanding of users? perspectives on news personalisation which is particulary relevant considering the increasing use of personalised news and the fact that it is individual citizens? responsibility to be accurately and comprehensively informed in a media environment where the news content is fragmented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologija
Sociologija SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信