社会经营许可:一体化框架

IF 3.9 3区管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT

Management International Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.59876/a-4f8b-3vc5

Sofiane Baba, Jacqueline Dahan

{"title":"社会经营许可:一体化框架","authors":"Sofiane Baba, Jacqueline Dahan","doi":"10.59876/a-4f8b-3vc5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature generically addresses controversies related to the lack of social acceptance of projects, generally overlooking their specificities. We argue instead that each trajectory of social acceptance (or lack thereof) is unique. This article demonstrates this through a qualitative analysis of three controversial projects: Matoush uranium mining (2006-2020), Facebook’s cryptocurrency (2017-2021), and Covid-19 vaccination (2020-2021). We develop an analytical framework that conceptualizes social acceptance as a dynamic trajectory of legitimation and justification revolving around three pillars: eco-traditional, symbolic, and technical. This article enriches our understanding of social acceptance issues and offers research perspectives at the interface of social acceptance, legitimation, and institutional logics.","PeriodicalId":51434,"journal":{"name":"Management International Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social license to operate: An integrative framework\",\"authors\":\"Sofiane Baba, Jacqueline Dahan\",\"doi\":\"10.59876/a-4f8b-3vc5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The literature generically addresses controversies related to the lack of social acceptance of projects, generally overlooking their specificities. We argue instead that each trajectory of social acceptance (or lack thereof) is unique. This article demonstrates this through a qualitative analysis of three controversial projects: Matoush uranium mining (2006-2020), Facebook’s cryptocurrency (2017-2021), and Covid-19 vaccination (2020-2021). We develop an analytical framework that conceptualizes social acceptance as a dynamic trajectory of legitimation and justification revolving around three pillars: eco-traditional, symbolic, and technical. This article enriches our understanding of social acceptance issues and offers research perspectives at the interface of social acceptance, legitimation, and institutional logics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management International Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management International Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59876/a-4f8b-3vc5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management International Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59876/a-4f8b-3vc5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

文献一般解决与缺乏社会对项目的接受有关的争议，通常忽略了它们的特殊性。相反，我们认为社会接受(或缺乏)的每个轨迹都是独一无二的。本文通过对三个有争议的项目进行定性分析来证明这一点:Matoush铀矿开采(2006-2020)，Facebook的加密货币(2017-2021)和Covid-19疫苗接种(2020-2021)。我们开发了一个分析框架，将社会接受概念化为围绕三大支柱的合法性和正当性的动态轨迹:生态传统，象征和技术。本文丰富了我们对社会接受问题的理解，并从社会接受、合法化和制度逻辑的角度提供了研究视角。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Social license to operate: An integrative framework

The literature generically addresses controversies related to the lack of social acceptance of projects, generally overlooking their specificities. We argue instead that each trajectory of social acceptance (or lack thereof) is unique. This article demonstrates this through a qualitative analysis of three controversial projects: Matoush uranium mining (2006-2020), Facebook’s cryptocurrency (2017-2021), and Covid-19 vaccination (2020-2021). We develop an analytical framework that conceptualizes social acceptance as a dynamic trajectory of legitimation and justification revolving around three pillars: eco-traditional, symbolic, and technical. This article enriches our understanding of social acceptance issues and offers research perspectives at the interface of social acceptance, legitimation, and institutional logics.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Management International Review MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

6.50

自引率

11.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Management International Review publishes research-based articles that reflect significant advances in the key areas of International Management. Its target audience consists of scholars in International Business Administration. Management International Review is a double-blind refereed journal that aims at the advancement and dissemination of research in the fields of International Management. The scope of the journal comprises International Business, Cross-Cultural Management, and Comparative Management. The journal publishes research that builds or extends International Management theory so that it can contribute to International Management practice. Management International Review welcomes both theoretical and empirical work. Original papers are invited that are based on a solid theoretical basis and a rigorous methodology. In the area of empirical studies, the journal publishes both quantitative and qualitative research. To be published in Management International Review, a paper must make strong contributions and highlight the significance of those contributions to the field of International Management. The editors are especially interested in manuscripts that break new ground rather than papers that make only incremental contributions. Management International Review publishes articles and research notes. Every year, six issues are published. On average, two of these issues are Focused Issues, which concentrate on a specific subfield of International Management.