非营利组织与行业比较研究:回顾与展望

IF 2.3 2区社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES

Voluntas Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI:10.1007/s11266-023-00608-5

Helmut K. Anheier

{"title":"非营利组织与行业比较研究:回顾与展望","authors":"Helmut K. Anheier","doi":"10.1007/s11266-023-00608-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While comparative research on nonprofit organizations has made much progress since the launch of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project in 1990, there now seems to be a loss of momentum. Some of the reasons for this have to do with aspects of definition, classification, and aggregation that can be corrected. The main issue, however, is the lack of progress in advancing comparative nonprofit sector theories beyond the social origins theory. To remedy this, the essay proposes four ways forward as part of a new research agenda.","PeriodicalId":48082,"journal":{"name":"Voluntas","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Sectors: Looking Back and Looking Forward\",\"authors\":\"Helmut K. Anheier\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11266-023-00608-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract While comparative research on nonprofit organizations has made much progress since the launch of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project in 1990, there now seems to be a loss of momentum. Some of the reasons for this have to do with aspects of definition, classification, and aggregation that can be corrected. The main issue, however, is the lack of progress in advancing comparative nonprofit sector theories beyond the social origins theory. To remedy this, the essay proposes four ways forward as part of a new research agenda.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voluntas\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voluntas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00608-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voluntas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00608-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

自1990年约翰霍普金斯大学非营利部门比较项目启动以来，非营利组织的比较研究取得了很大进展，但目前似乎势头有所减弱。造成这种情况的一些原因与可以纠正的定义、分类和聚合方面有关。然而，主要的问题是，在推动比较非营利部门理论超越社会起源理论方面缺乏进展。为了弥补这一点，本文提出了作为新研究议程一部分的四种前进方式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparative Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Sectors: Looking Back and Looking Forward

Abstract While comparative research on nonprofit organizations has made much progress since the launch of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project in 1990, there now seems to be a loss of momentum. Some of the reasons for this have to do with aspects of definition, classification, and aggregation that can be corrected. The main issue, however, is the lack of progress in advancing comparative nonprofit sector theories beyond the social origins theory. To remedy this, the essay proposes four ways forward as part of a new research agenda.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Voluntas SOCIAL ISSUES-

CiteScore

5.10

自引率

16.70%

发文量

107

审稿时长

13 weeks

期刊介绍： The official journal of the International Society for Third-Sector Research, Voluntas is an interdisciplinary international journal that aims to be the central forum for worldwide research in the area between the state, market, and household sectors. The journal combines full-length articles with shorter research notes (reflecting the latest developments in the field) and book reviews. Voluntas is essential reading for all those engaged in research into the Third Sector (voluntary and nonprofit organizations) including economists, lawyers, political scientists, psychologists, sociologists, and social and public policy analysts. It aims to present leading-edge academic argument around civil society issues in a style that is accessible to practitioners and policymakers.