残疾和不稳定的国家生产

IF 4.4 2区社会学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR

Work and Occupations Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1177/07308884231207773

Emily H. Ruppel

{"title":"残疾和不稳定的国家生产","authors":"Emily H. Ruppel","doi":"10.1177/07308884231207773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Materialist theories of disability link disability and labor, hypothesizing that under neoliberalism, disability stigma contributes to labor market precarity. These claims have not been evaluated empirically and the mediating role of the state remains underspecified. Ethnographic fieldwork in a job training program for people with psychiatric disabilities reveals two contradictions in the welfare state treatment of disability. First, disability benefits are set at low levels, yet means-testing limits earnings, channeling people with disabilities into low-wage jobs. Second, contradictory imperatives attached to state funding incentivize placement in temporary jobs. These welfare state contradictions produce disabled workers as a precarious labor force.","PeriodicalId":47716,"journal":{"name":"Work and Occupations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disability and the State Production of Precarity\",\"authors\":\"Emily H. Ruppel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07308884231207773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Materialist theories of disability link disability and labor, hypothesizing that under neoliberalism, disability stigma contributes to labor market precarity. These claims have not been evaluated empirically and the mediating role of the state remains underspecified. Ethnographic fieldwork in a job training program for people with psychiatric disabilities reveals two contradictions in the welfare state treatment of disability. First, disability benefits are set at low levels, yet means-testing limits earnings, channeling people with disabilities into low-wage jobs. Second, contradictory imperatives attached to state funding incentivize placement in temporary jobs. These welfare state contradictions produce disabled workers as a precarious labor force.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Work and Occupations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Work and Occupations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231207773\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work and Occupations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231207773","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

残疾的唯物主义理论将残疾和劳动联系起来，假设在新自由主义下，残疾的耻辱有助于劳动力市场的不稳定性。这些说法还没有经过经验评估，国家的中介作用也没有得到充分说明。对精神残障人士职业培训项目的民族志田野调查揭示了福利国家对待残障人士的两大矛盾。首先，残疾人福利设定在较低水平，但经济状况调查限制了收入，导致残疾人从事低薪工作。其次，与国家资金相关联的相互矛盾的要求激励了临时工作的安置。这些福利国家的矛盾导致残疾工人成为不稳定的劳动力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Disability and the State Production of Precarity

Materialist theories of disability link disability and labor, hypothesizing that under neoliberalism, disability stigma contributes to labor market precarity. These claims have not been evaluated empirically and the mediating role of the state remains underspecified. Ethnographic fieldwork in a job training program for people with psychiatric disabilities reveals two contradictions in the welfare state treatment of disability. First, disability benefits are set at low levels, yet means-testing limits earnings, channeling people with disabilities into low-wage jobs. Second, contradictory imperatives attached to state funding incentivize placement in temporary jobs. These welfare state contradictions produce disabled workers as a precarious labor force.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Work and Occupations Multiple-

CiteScore

5.90

自引率

24.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： For over 30 years, Work and Occupations has published rigorous social science research on the human dynamics of the workplace, employment, and society from an international, interdisciplinary perspective. Work and Occupations provides you with a broad perspective on the workplace, examining international approaches to work-related issues as well as insights from scholars in a variety of fields, including: anthropology, demography, education, government administration, history, industrial relations, labour economics, management, psychology, and sociology. In addition to regular features including research notes, review essays, and book reviews.