喷雾干燥血浆在生长肥育猪饲料添加剂中替代抗生素的应用

JSFA reports Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1002/jsf2.164
Bernardo Gesing, Maria Eduarda Rosa, Luis Fernando Sarmento Rangel, William Gustavo Sganzerla, Jocleita Peruzzo Ferrareze, Vanessa Peripolli, José Mauricio dos Santos Neto, Ivan Bianchi, Juahil Martins de Oliveira Jr, Elizabeth Schwegler, Fabiana Moreira
{"title":"喷雾干燥血浆在生长肥育猪饲料添加剂中替代抗生素的应用","authors":"Bernardo Gesing,&nbsp;Maria Eduarda Rosa,&nbsp;Luis Fernando Sarmento Rangel,&nbsp;William Gustavo Sganzerla,&nbsp;Jocleita Peruzzo Ferrareze,&nbsp;Vanessa Peripolli,&nbsp;José Mauricio dos Santos Neto,&nbsp;Ivan Bianchi,&nbsp;Juahil Martins de Oliveira Jr,&nbsp;Elizabeth Schwegler,&nbsp;Fabiana Moreira","doi":"10.1002/jsf2.164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the effect of spray-dried blood plasma (SDP) as a feed additive for the replacement of antibiotics in swine production. The treatments were used as strategic pulses of either antibiotics or SDP in the feed of swine during the growth and termination phases. The experimental design was conducted by 4 dietary treatments with a total of 1456 swine selected just after leaving the nursery and evaluated for 122 days until slaughter.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The feed with the addition of the standard medication protocol (antibiotics) and without the inclusion of SDP had the highest feed intake (289.73 ± 3.04 kg) and reached a feed conversion of 2.57 ± 0.02 kg feed consumed per kg weight gained. Weight gain during the period of 0–122 days for the treatment with three pulses of SDP with (114.12 ± 0.64 kg) and without antibiotics (114.26 ± 1.01 kg) was higher than the control treatment (111.46 ± 1.10 kg, without antibiotics and SDP). Furthermore, the antibiotic-based treatment associated with SDP showed a 7.76% increase in weight gain when compared with the control group. Furthermore, there was a nonsignificant difference in the mortality of animals and in the index for pneumonia and ulcer score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The application of SDP as a feed additive in swine at the growth and termination phases, combined with antibiotics, favored feed intake and weight gain and could be a promising alternative to upgrade zootechnical parameters in swine production.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93795,"journal":{"name":"JSFA reports","volume":"3 11","pages":"609-618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of spray-dried blood plasma as a feed additive for the replacement of antibiotics in growing-finishing swine\",\"authors\":\"Bernardo Gesing,&nbsp;Maria Eduarda Rosa,&nbsp;Luis Fernando Sarmento Rangel,&nbsp;William Gustavo Sganzerla,&nbsp;Jocleita Peruzzo Ferrareze,&nbsp;Vanessa Peripolli,&nbsp;José Mauricio dos Santos Neto,&nbsp;Ivan Bianchi,&nbsp;Juahil Martins de Oliveira Jr,&nbsp;Elizabeth Schwegler,&nbsp;Fabiana Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jsf2.164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study evaluated the effect of spray-dried blood plasma (SDP) as a feed additive for the replacement of antibiotics in swine production. The treatments were used as strategic pulses of either antibiotics or SDP in the feed of swine during the growth and termination phases. The experimental design was conducted by 4 dietary treatments with a total of 1456 swine selected just after leaving the nursery and evaluated for 122 days until slaughter.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The feed with the addition of the standard medication protocol (antibiotics) and without the inclusion of SDP had the highest feed intake (289.73 ± 3.04 kg) and reached a feed conversion of 2.57 ± 0.02 kg feed consumed per kg weight gained. Weight gain during the period of 0–122 days for the treatment with three pulses of SDP with (114.12 ± 0.64 kg) and without antibiotics (114.26 ± 1.01 kg) was higher than the control treatment (111.46 ± 1.10 kg, without antibiotics and SDP). Furthermore, the antibiotic-based treatment associated with SDP showed a 7.76% increase in weight gain when compared with the control group. Furthermore, there was a nonsignificant difference in the mortality of animals and in the index for pneumonia and ulcer score.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The application of SDP as a feed additive in swine at the growth and termination phases, combined with antibiotics, favored feed intake and weight gain and could be a promising alternative to upgrade zootechnical parameters in swine production.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSFA reports\",\"volume\":\"3 11\",\"pages\":\"609-618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSFA reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsf2.164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSFA reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsf2.164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评价了喷雾干燥血浆(SDP)作为饲料添加剂在猪生产中替代抗生素的效果。在生长期和终止期,在猪饲料中作为抗生素或SDP的战略脉冲处理。试验设计采用4个饲粮处理,选取刚出苗圃的1456头猪,进行122 d的评价,直至屠宰。结果添加标准用药方案(抗生素)和不添加SDP的饲料采食量最高(289.73±3.04 kg),饲料转化率为每千克增重消耗饲料2.57±0.02 kg。3次脉冲SDP治疗组0 ~ 122 d的增重(114.12±0.64 kg)高于对照组(111.46±1.10 kg,不加抗生素和SDP)。此外,与对照组相比,与SDP相关的抗生素治疗显示体重增加7.76%。此外,在动物死亡率和肺炎指数和溃疡评分方面也没有显著差异。结论SDP作为生长期和终止期猪的饲料添加剂,与抗生素联合使用,有利于猪的采食量和增重,是提高猪生产动物技术参数的一种有前景的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of spray-dried blood plasma as a feed additive for the replacement of antibiotics in growing-finishing swine

Background

This study evaluated the effect of spray-dried blood plasma (SDP) as a feed additive for the replacement of antibiotics in swine production. The treatments were used as strategic pulses of either antibiotics or SDP in the feed of swine during the growth and termination phases. The experimental design was conducted by 4 dietary treatments with a total of 1456 swine selected just after leaving the nursery and evaluated for 122 days until slaughter.

Results

The feed with the addition of the standard medication protocol (antibiotics) and without the inclusion of SDP had the highest feed intake (289.73 ± 3.04 kg) and reached a feed conversion of 2.57 ± 0.02 kg feed consumed per kg weight gained. Weight gain during the period of 0–122 days for the treatment with three pulses of SDP with (114.12 ± 0.64 kg) and without antibiotics (114.26 ± 1.01 kg) was higher than the control treatment (111.46 ± 1.10 kg, without antibiotics and SDP). Furthermore, the antibiotic-based treatment associated with SDP showed a 7.76% increase in weight gain when compared with the control group. Furthermore, there was a nonsignificant difference in the mortality of animals and in the index for pneumonia and ulcer score.

Conclusion

The application of SDP as a feed additive in swine at the growth and termination phases, combined with antibiotics, favored feed intake and weight gain and could be a promising alternative to upgrade zootechnical parameters in swine production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信