ProTaper Ultimate、TruNatomy和Rotate旋转锉在根尖碎片挤压中的比较

IF 0.2 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mehmet Eskibağlar, Merve Yeniçeri Özata, Lucia lacobina Timis
{"title":"ProTaper Ultimate、TruNatomy和Rotate旋转锉在根尖碎片挤压中的比较","authors":"Mehmet Eskibağlar, Merve Yeniçeri Özata, Lucia lacobina Timis","doi":"10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the amount of debris extruded apically by the primary shaping files of three rotary file systems manufactured with different alloy technologies [TruNatomy (TRN), ProTaper Ultimate (PTUltimate), and VDW.Rotate (VDW.R) files]. Methodology: Thirty lower premolar teeth with moderate curvature (10-20°) were randomly divided into three equal groups (n=10) according to three rotary file systems [TRN (26.04v), PTUltimate (25.08v), and VDW.R (25.06v)]. The debris extruded apically was collected in Eppendorf tubes of known weights. After preparation, the tubes were placed in an incubator at 70°C for five days to evaporate the distilled water. The tubes filled with debris were then weighed again, and the net weight of the extruded debris was calculated in grams (g) by subtracting the initial weight from the final weight. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test. Results: There was no significant difference in the amount of debris extruded apically by the three shaping files (p > 0.05). The highest amount of debris extruded apically was 0.9534 g for PTUltimate. VDW.R extruded the minimum amount of debris apically, with 0.1833 g. Conclusion: All rotary files have caused apical debris extrusion. Even though there was no significant difference among the files, the VDW.R file extruded less debris compared to other file systems. How to cite this article: Eskibağlar M, Yeniçeri Özata M, Timis Ll. Comparison of ProTaper Ultimate, TruNatomy, and Rotate rotary files in apical debris extrusion. Int Dent Res 2023;13(S1):26-31. https://doi.org/10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.4 Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.","PeriodicalId":31322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of ProTaper Ultimate, TruNatomy, and Rotate rotary files in apical debris extrusion\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Eskibağlar, Merve Yeniçeri Özata, Lucia lacobina Timis\",\"doi\":\"10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the amount of debris extruded apically by the primary shaping files of three rotary file systems manufactured with different alloy technologies [TruNatomy (TRN), ProTaper Ultimate (PTUltimate), and VDW.Rotate (VDW.R) files]. Methodology: Thirty lower premolar teeth with moderate curvature (10-20°) were randomly divided into three equal groups (n=10) according to three rotary file systems [TRN (26.04v), PTUltimate (25.08v), and VDW.R (25.06v)]. The debris extruded apically was collected in Eppendorf tubes of known weights. After preparation, the tubes were placed in an incubator at 70°C for five days to evaporate the distilled water. The tubes filled with debris were then weighed again, and the net weight of the extruded debris was calculated in grams (g) by subtracting the initial weight from the final weight. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test. Results: There was no significant difference in the amount of debris extruded apically by the three shaping files (p > 0.05). The highest amount of debris extruded apically was 0.9534 g for PTUltimate. VDW.R extruded the minimum amount of debris apically, with 0.1833 g. Conclusion: All rotary files have caused apical debris extrusion. Even though there was no significant difference among the files, the VDW.R file extruded less debris compared to other file systems. How to cite this article: Eskibağlar M, Yeniçeri Özata M, Timis Ll. Comparison of ProTaper Ultimate, TruNatomy, and Rotate rotary files in apical debris extrusion. Int Dent Res 2023;13(S1):26-31. https://doi.org/10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.4 Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估三种不同合金技术[TruNatomy (TRN), ProTaper Ultimate (PTUltimate)和VDW]制造的旋转文件系统的主要成形文件在根尖上挤出的碎片量。旋转(vdww . r)文件]。方法:选取30颗曲率适中(10 ~ 20°)的下前磨牙,根据三种旋转文件系统[TRN (26.04v), PTUltimate (25.08v), VDW]随机分为三组(n=10)。R (25.06 v)]。顶部挤压的碎片收集在已知重量的埃彭多夫管中。制备完成后,将试管置于70℃培养箱中,蒸馏水蒸发5天。然后再次称重充满碎片的管子,挤压碎片的净重以克(g)为单位,通过从最终重量减去初始重量来计算。数据分析采用单因素方差分析。结果:三种整形锉在根尖挤出碎片量方面无显著差异(p >0.05)。PTUltimate的根尖挤出碎屑量最高,为0.9534 g。VDW。R顶挤出的碎屑量最小,为0.1833 g。结论:所有旋转锉均造成尖屑挤压。尽管这些文件之间没有显著差异,但VDW。与其他文件系统相比,R文件挤出的碎片更少。如何引用本文:Eskibağlar M, yenieri Özata M, Timis Ll。ProTaper Ultimate、TruNatomy和Rotate旋转锉在根尖碎片挤压中的比较。国际医学杂志,2013;13(S1):26-31。https://doi.org/10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.4语言修改:本手稿中的英语已由至少两名专业编辑检查,他们都是英语母语者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of ProTaper Ultimate, TruNatomy, and Rotate rotary files in apical debris extrusion
Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the amount of debris extruded apically by the primary shaping files of three rotary file systems manufactured with different alloy technologies [TruNatomy (TRN), ProTaper Ultimate (PTUltimate), and VDW.Rotate (VDW.R) files]. Methodology: Thirty lower premolar teeth with moderate curvature (10-20°) were randomly divided into three equal groups (n=10) according to three rotary file systems [TRN (26.04v), PTUltimate (25.08v), and VDW.R (25.06v)]. The debris extruded apically was collected in Eppendorf tubes of known weights. After preparation, the tubes were placed in an incubator at 70°C for five days to evaporate the distilled water. The tubes filled with debris were then weighed again, and the net weight of the extruded debris was calculated in grams (g) by subtracting the initial weight from the final weight. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test. Results: There was no significant difference in the amount of debris extruded apically by the three shaping files (p > 0.05). The highest amount of debris extruded apically was 0.9534 g for PTUltimate. VDW.R extruded the minimum amount of debris apically, with 0.1833 g. Conclusion: All rotary files have caused apical debris extrusion. Even though there was no significant difference among the files, the VDW.R file extruded less debris compared to other file systems. How to cite this article: Eskibağlar M, Yeniçeri Özata M, Timis Ll. Comparison of ProTaper Ultimate, TruNatomy, and Rotate rotary files in apical debris extrusion. Int Dent Res 2023;13(S1):26-31. https://doi.org/10.5577/idr.2023.vol13.s1.4 Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信