混合寡头垄断下研发与福利的交叉所有权:凸成本的重新审视

IF 3.2 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Hao Cheng, Xiaoyuan Ding, Chenhang Zeng
{"title":"混合寡头垄断下研发与福利的交叉所有权:凸成本的重新审视","authors":"Hao Cheng, Xiaoyuan Ding, Chenhang Zeng","doi":"10.1080/10438599.2023.2255975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper revisits how private cross-ownership affects cost-reducing R&D, production quantities, consumer surplus, firms’ profits and social welfare in a mixed oligopoly with a convex cost function. We show that increasing cross-ownership reduces private firms’ R&D but increases the semi-public firm’s R&D. Further, both consumer surplus and social welfare could be enhanced through cross-ownership when the convexity of cost function is small. However, increasing cross-ownership could hurt consumers and social welfare when the convexity of cost function is large. Our finding highlights that the convexity of cost function is very important to the welfare implications of cross-ownership. Hence, antitrust authorities should be more careful when assessing the welfare effects of partial ownership in different industries.","PeriodicalId":51485,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Innovation and New Technology","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-ownership on R&D and welfare in a mixed oligopoly: revisiting with convex cost\",\"authors\":\"Hao Cheng, Xiaoyuan Ding, Chenhang Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10438599.2023.2255975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper revisits how private cross-ownership affects cost-reducing R&D, production quantities, consumer surplus, firms’ profits and social welfare in a mixed oligopoly with a convex cost function. We show that increasing cross-ownership reduces private firms’ R&D but increases the semi-public firm’s R&D. Further, both consumer surplus and social welfare could be enhanced through cross-ownership when the convexity of cost function is small. However, increasing cross-ownership could hurt consumers and social welfare when the convexity of cost function is large. Our finding highlights that the convexity of cost function is very important to the welfare implications of cross-ownership. Hence, antitrust authorities should be more careful when assessing the welfare effects of partial ownership in different industries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Innovation and New Technology\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Innovation and New Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2023.2255975\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Innovation and New Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2023.2255975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重新考察了具有凸成本函数的混合寡头垄断下私人交叉所有制如何影响降低成本的研发、生产数量、消费者剩余、企业利润和社会福利。研究表明,交叉持股的增加降低了民营企业的研发投入,但增加了半上市企业的研发投入。此外,当成本函数的凸度较小时,通过交叉所有制可以提高消费者剩余和社会福利。然而,当成本函数的凸度较大时,交叉所有权的增加会损害消费者和社会福利。我们的发现强调了成本函数的凸性对交叉持股的福利影响是非常重要的。因此,反垄断当局在评估不同行业的部分所有权对福利的影响时应该更加谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-ownership on R&D and welfare in a mixed oligopoly: revisiting with convex cost
This paper revisits how private cross-ownership affects cost-reducing R&D, production quantities, consumer surplus, firms’ profits and social welfare in a mixed oligopoly with a convex cost function. We show that increasing cross-ownership reduces private firms’ R&D but increases the semi-public firm’s R&D. Further, both consumer surplus and social welfare could be enhanced through cross-ownership when the convexity of cost function is small. However, increasing cross-ownership could hurt consumers and social welfare when the convexity of cost function is large. Our finding highlights that the convexity of cost function is very important to the welfare implications of cross-ownership. Hence, antitrust authorities should be more careful when assessing the welfare effects of partial ownership in different industries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Economics of Innovation and New Technology is devoted to the theoretical and empirical analysis of the determinants and effects of innovation, new technology and technological knowledge. The journal aims to provide a bridge between different strands of literature and different contributions of economic theory and empirical economics. This bridge is built in two ways. First, by encouraging empirical research (including case studies, econometric work and historical research), evaluating existing economic theory, and suggesting appropriate directions for future effort in theoretical work. Second, by exploring ways of applying and testing existing areas of theory to the economics of innovation and new technology, and ways of using theoretical insights to inform data collection and other empirical research. The journal welcomes contributions across a wide range of issues concerned with innovation, including: the generation of new technological knowledge, innovation in product markets, process innovation, patenting, adoption, diffusion, innovation and technology policy, international competitiveness, standardization and network externalities, innovation and growth, technology transfer, innovation and market structure, innovation and the environment, and across a broad range of economic activity not just in ‘high technology’ areas. The journal is open to a variety of methodological approaches ranging from case studies to econometric exercises with sound theoretical modelling, empirical evidence both longitudinal and cross-sectional about technologies, regions, firms, industries and countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信