高速钻头在颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合手术中安全、充分的神经减压的疗效。

Ahmed Nagaty, Omar Ahmed, Khaled Elshazly, Mohamed Abd Elshafouk
{"title":"高速钻头在颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合手术中安全、充分的神经减压的疗效。","authors":"Ahmed Nagaty, Omar Ahmed, Khaled Elshazly, Mohamed Abd Elshafouk","doi":"10.21608/asmj.2023.321809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background: Risks of inadequate decompression or neural injury during conventional Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Fusion (ACDF) surgery is not uncommon specially in cases with large posterior osteophytes or migrating fragments. Usage of High-speed Drill instead of Curettes and Kerrison Rongeurs may has a role for safe and adequate decompression. Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of using high speed drill during ACDF surgery in comparison to conventional approach. Design: A retrospective comparative study. Methods: 60 Patients were divided into 2 groups; Group A, 30 patients who underwent Conventional ACDF surgery without using high speed drill, and group B, 30 patients underwent ACDF with the aid of high-speed drill. Results: Postoperative VAS of neck pain and Upper limbs in both groups had nearly the same end results with no statistically significant difference. In Group A: the mean Postoperative Odom’s criteria was 1.47 ± 0.629 SD, while Group B showed nearly the same values. As regards the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA score), Group B showed better results with mean JOA score value equals 15.7 ± 1.02 SD, which showed statistically significant difference between both groups with p-value 0.015. In addition, Group B showed slightly better results as regards operation time and intraoperative Blood loss but with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: High speed drill is an efficient and safe tool that can be used in ACDF surgery for adequate neural decompression, with good clinical and radiological outcomes comparable to conventional methods, even with better neurological outcome and less operative time.","PeriodicalId":7450,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Medical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFICACY OF HIGH SPEED DRILL FOR SAFE AND ADEQUATE NEURAL DECOMPRESSION IN ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION SURGERIES.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Nagaty, Omar Ahmed, Khaled Elshazly, Mohamed Abd Elshafouk\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/asmj.2023.321809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Background: Risks of inadequate decompression or neural injury during conventional Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Fusion (ACDF) surgery is not uncommon specially in cases with large posterior osteophytes or migrating fragments. Usage of High-speed Drill instead of Curettes and Kerrison Rongeurs may has a role for safe and adequate decompression. Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of using high speed drill during ACDF surgery in comparison to conventional approach. Design: A retrospective comparative study. Methods: 60 Patients were divided into 2 groups; Group A, 30 patients who underwent Conventional ACDF surgery without using high speed drill, and group B, 30 patients underwent ACDF with the aid of high-speed drill. Results: Postoperative VAS of neck pain and Upper limbs in both groups had nearly the same end results with no statistically significant difference. In Group A: the mean Postoperative Odom’s criteria was 1.47 ± 0.629 SD, while Group B showed nearly the same values. As regards the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA score), Group B showed better results with mean JOA score value equals 15.7 ± 1.02 SD, which showed statistically significant difference between both groups with p-value 0.015. In addition, Group B showed slightly better results as regards operation time and intraoperative Blood loss but with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: High speed drill is an efficient and safe tool that can be used in ACDF surgery for adequate neural decompression, with good clinical and radiological outcomes comparable to conventional methods, even with better neurological outcome and less operative time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ain Shams Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ain Shams Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/asmj.2023.321809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/asmj.2023.321809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFFICACY OF HIGH SPEED DRILL FOR SAFE AND ADEQUATE NEURAL DECOMPRESSION IN ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION SURGERIES.
: Background: Risks of inadequate decompression or neural injury during conventional Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Fusion (ACDF) surgery is not uncommon specially in cases with large posterior osteophytes or migrating fragments. Usage of High-speed Drill instead of Curettes and Kerrison Rongeurs may has a role for safe and adequate decompression. Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of using high speed drill during ACDF surgery in comparison to conventional approach. Design: A retrospective comparative study. Methods: 60 Patients were divided into 2 groups; Group A, 30 patients who underwent Conventional ACDF surgery without using high speed drill, and group B, 30 patients underwent ACDF with the aid of high-speed drill. Results: Postoperative VAS of neck pain and Upper limbs in both groups had nearly the same end results with no statistically significant difference. In Group A: the mean Postoperative Odom’s criteria was 1.47 ± 0.629 SD, while Group B showed nearly the same values. As regards the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA score), Group B showed better results with mean JOA score value equals 15.7 ± 1.02 SD, which showed statistically significant difference between both groups with p-value 0.015. In addition, Group B showed slightly better results as regards operation time and intraoperative Blood loss but with no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: High speed drill is an efficient and safe tool that can be used in ACDF surgery for adequate neural decompression, with good clinical and radiological outcomes comparable to conventional methods, even with better neurological outcome and less operative time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信