{"title":"巴西的州法院和Covid-19政策:下级司法机构如何进行宪法审查?","authors":"Tassiana Moura de Oliveira","doi":"10.25091/s01013300202300020002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do state courts in Brazil participate in the debate about Covid-19 policies? I argue that state courts had a role in making decisions on key policies when political actors couldn’t agree on how to handle the crisis. This paper compares its findings to what previous research has found on the role of the STF at the federal level. The results show that subnational institutions tried to use state courts to halt such policies in a similar way to what happened in the STF.","PeriodicalId":35272,"journal":{"name":"Novos Estudos CEBRAP","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Courts and Covid-19 Policies in Brazil: How Did the Constitutional Review Take Place in the Lower-Level Judiciary?\",\"authors\":\"Tassiana Moura de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.25091/s01013300202300020002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How do state courts in Brazil participate in the debate about Covid-19 policies? I argue that state courts had a role in making decisions on key policies when political actors couldn’t agree on how to handle the crisis. This paper compares its findings to what previous research has found on the role of the STF at the federal level. The results show that subnational institutions tried to use state courts to halt such policies in a similar way to what happened in the STF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Novos Estudos CEBRAP\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Novos Estudos CEBRAP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25091/s01013300202300020002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novos Estudos CEBRAP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25091/s01013300202300020002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
State Courts and Covid-19 Policies in Brazil: How Did the Constitutional Review Take Place in the Lower-Level Judiciary?
How do state courts in Brazil participate in the debate about Covid-19 policies? I argue that state courts had a role in making decisions on key policies when political actors couldn’t agree on how to handle the crisis. This paper compares its findings to what previous research has found on the role of the STF at the federal level. The results show that subnational institutions tried to use state courts to halt such policies in a similar way to what happened in the STF.
期刊介绍:
Novos Estudos Cebrap to publish original contributions in Sociology, Politics, Anthropology and Humanities. The goal of the journal is to publish relevant studies and to present contributions to the intellectual debate in a wide variety of subjects, from art criticism to the implementation of economic and social polices. Its abbreviated title is Novos estud. - CEBRAP, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.