尼日利亚尤约地区伤口金黄色葡萄球菌大环内酯、利可沙胺和链状gramin B分布及erm基因检测

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
A.N. Umo, N.C. Ibeakamma, O.J. Akinjogunla, U.E. Etang, N.G. Akpan, S.A. Adie
{"title":"尼日利亚尤约地区伤口金黄色葡萄球菌大环内酯、利可沙胺和链状gramin B分布及erm基因检测","authors":"A.N. Umo, N.C. Ibeakamma, O.J. Akinjogunla, U.E. Etang, N.G. Akpan, S.A. Adie","doi":"10.59393/amb23390307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B (MLSB) among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a challenge. The study determined the constitutive and inducible MLSB resistance and erm genes in S. aureus from wounds using the erythromycin-clindamycin D-zone test and a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay, respectively. Of the 260 patients recruited in the study, S. aureus was isolated from the wounds of 102 patients, giving a prevalence rate of 39.2%. Of the 102 S. aureus isolates, 32.4% were methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), and 67.6% were MRSA. The prevalence of S. aureus in wounds was higher in females (39.8%) than in males (38.4%). The highest prevalence of S. aureus was found in divorce patients (59.1%) and those residing in urban areas (39.7%). There was no statistical difference between the occurrence of MRSA and MSSA in wounds based on the sex (p = 0.97), age (p = 0.08), and marital status (p = 0.41) of the patients. All (100%) MRSA were resistant to Cefoxitin, and chloramphenicol, while ˂ 50% of MRSA were resistant to Tetracycline, Ciprofloxacin, and Gentamycin. Of the 69 MRSA isolates from the wounds, 21.7% and 26.1% were iMLSB and cMLSB phenotypes, respectively. Nine (9) MSSA were iMLSB phenotypes, and eight MSSA were cMLSB phenotypes. Among the 12 representative isolates, three (3) MRSA and one (1) MSSA isolate possessed the ermC gene. This study has revealed that screening tests for iMLSB-resistant S. aureus strains are critical for the therapeutic management of wound infections caused by S. aureus.","PeriodicalId":35526,"journal":{"name":"Acta Microbiologica Bulgarica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distribution of Macrolide, Lincosamide, and Streptogramin B and Detection of erm Genes in Staphylococcus aureus from Wounds in Uyo, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"A.N. Umo, N.C. Ibeakamma, O.J. Akinjogunla, U.E. Etang, N.G. Akpan, S.A. Adie\",\"doi\":\"10.59393/amb23390307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increasing resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B (MLSB) among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a challenge. The study determined the constitutive and inducible MLSB resistance and erm genes in S. aureus from wounds using the erythromycin-clindamycin D-zone test and a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay, respectively. Of the 260 patients recruited in the study, S. aureus was isolated from the wounds of 102 patients, giving a prevalence rate of 39.2%. Of the 102 S. aureus isolates, 32.4% were methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), and 67.6% were MRSA. The prevalence of S. aureus in wounds was higher in females (39.8%) than in males (38.4%). The highest prevalence of S. aureus was found in divorce patients (59.1%) and those residing in urban areas (39.7%). There was no statistical difference between the occurrence of MRSA and MSSA in wounds based on the sex (p = 0.97), age (p = 0.08), and marital status (p = 0.41) of the patients. All (100%) MRSA were resistant to Cefoxitin, and chloramphenicol, while ˂ 50% of MRSA were resistant to Tetracycline, Ciprofloxacin, and Gentamycin. Of the 69 MRSA isolates from the wounds, 21.7% and 26.1% were iMLSB and cMLSB phenotypes, respectively. Nine (9) MSSA were iMLSB phenotypes, and eight MSSA were cMLSB phenotypes. Among the 12 representative isolates, three (3) MRSA and one (1) MSSA isolate possessed the ermC gene. This study has revealed that screening tests for iMLSB-resistant S. aureus strains are critical for the therapeutic management of wound infections caused by S. aureus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Microbiologica Bulgarica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Microbiologica Bulgarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59393/amb23390307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Microbiologica Bulgarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59393/amb23390307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)对大环内酯、利可沙胺和链状gramin B (MLSB)的耐药性日益增加是一个挑战。本研究分别采用红霉素-克林霉素d区试验和多重聚合酶链反应法测定伤口金黄色葡萄球菌的组成型和诱导型MLSB耐药基因和erm基因。在该研究招募的260例患者中,从102例患者的伤口中分离出金黄色葡萄球菌,患病率为39.2%。102株金黄色葡萄球菌中,32.4%为甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA), 67.6%为MRSA。伤口金黄色葡萄球菌感染率女性(39.8%)高于男性(38.4%)。金黄色葡萄球菌感染率最高的是离婚患者(59.1%)和城市居民(39.7%)。患者的性别(p = 0.97)、年龄(p = 0.08)、婚姻状况(p = 0.41)在伤口中MRSA与MSSA的发生率差异无统计学意义。所有(100%)MRSA对头孢西丁和氯霉素耐药,而小于50%的MRSA对四环素、环丙沙星和庆大霉素耐药。69株MRSA分离株中,iMLSB和cMLSB表型分别为21.7%和26.1%。9个MSSA为iMLSB表型,8个MSSA为cMLSB表型。在12株代表性分离株中,3株MRSA和1株MSSA分离株具有ermC基因。本研究表明,耐imlsb金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的筛选试验对于金黄色葡萄球菌引起的伤口感染的治疗管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distribution of Macrolide, Lincosamide, and Streptogramin B and Detection of erm Genes in Staphylococcus aureus from Wounds in Uyo, Nigeria
The increasing resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B (MLSB) among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a challenge. The study determined the constitutive and inducible MLSB resistance and erm genes in S. aureus from wounds using the erythromycin-clindamycin D-zone test and a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay, respectively. Of the 260 patients recruited in the study, S. aureus was isolated from the wounds of 102 patients, giving a prevalence rate of 39.2%. Of the 102 S. aureus isolates, 32.4% were methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA), and 67.6% were MRSA. The prevalence of S. aureus in wounds was higher in females (39.8%) than in males (38.4%). The highest prevalence of S. aureus was found in divorce patients (59.1%) and those residing in urban areas (39.7%). There was no statistical difference between the occurrence of MRSA and MSSA in wounds based on the sex (p = 0.97), age (p = 0.08), and marital status (p = 0.41) of the patients. All (100%) MRSA were resistant to Cefoxitin, and chloramphenicol, while ˂ 50% of MRSA were resistant to Tetracycline, Ciprofloxacin, and Gentamycin. Of the 69 MRSA isolates from the wounds, 21.7% and 26.1% were iMLSB and cMLSB phenotypes, respectively. Nine (9) MSSA were iMLSB phenotypes, and eight MSSA were cMLSB phenotypes. Among the 12 representative isolates, three (3) MRSA and one (1) MSSA isolate possessed the ermC gene. This study has revealed that screening tests for iMLSB-resistant S. aureus strains are critical for the therapeutic management of wound infections caused by S. aureus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Microbiologica Bulgarica
Acta Microbiologica Bulgarica Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信