协调陆地卫星-8和哨兵-2图像的可重复和可复制的方法

Rennan de Freitas Bezerra Marujo, Felipe Menino Carlos, Raphael Willian da Costa, Jeferson de Souza Arcanjo, José Guilherme Fronza, Anderson Reis Soares, Gilberto Ribeiro de Queiroz, Karine Reis Ferreira
{"title":"协调陆地卫星-8和哨兵-2图像的可重复和可复制的方法","authors":"Rennan de Freitas Bezerra Marujo, Felipe Menino Carlos, Raphael Willian da Costa, Jeferson de Souza Arcanjo, José Guilherme Fronza, Anderson Reis Soares, Gilberto Ribeiro de Queiroz, Karine Reis Ferreira","doi":"10.3389/frsen.2023.1254242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clouds and cloud shadows significantly impact optical remote sensing. Combining images from different sources can help to obtain more frequent time series of the Earth’s surface. Nevertheless, sensor differences must be accounted for and treated before combining images from multiple sensors. Even after geometric correction, inter-calibration, and bandpass, disparities in image measurements can persist. One potential factor contributing to this phenomenon is directional effects. Bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) corrections have emerged as an optional processing method to soften differences in surface reflectance (SR) measurements, where the c-factor is one of the available options for this task. The c-factor efficiency is well-proven for medium spatial resolution products. However, its use should be restricted to images from sensors with a narrow view since it causes subtle changes in the processed images. There are currently a limited number of open tools for users to independently process their images. Here, we implemented the required tools to generate a Nadir BRDF-Adjusted Surface Reflectance (NBAR) product through the c-factor approach, and we evaluated them for a study area using Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 images. Several comparisons were conducted to verify the SR and NBAR differences. Initially, a single-sensor approach was adopted and later a multi-source approach. Notably, NBAR products exhibit fewer disparities compared to SR products (prior to BRDF corrections). The results reinforce that the c-factor can be used to improve time series compatibility and, most importantly, provide the tools to allow users to generate the NBAR products themselves.","PeriodicalId":198378,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Remote Sensing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A reproducible and replicable approach for harmonizing Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 images\",\"authors\":\"Rennan de Freitas Bezerra Marujo, Felipe Menino Carlos, Raphael Willian da Costa, Jeferson de Souza Arcanjo, José Guilherme Fronza, Anderson Reis Soares, Gilberto Ribeiro de Queiroz, Karine Reis Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frsen.2023.1254242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clouds and cloud shadows significantly impact optical remote sensing. Combining images from different sources can help to obtain more frequent time series of the Earth’s surface. Nevertheless, sensor differences must be accounted for and treated before combining images from multiple sensors. Even after geometric correction, inter-calibration, and bandpass, disparities in image measurements can persist. One potential factor contributing to this phenomenon is directional effects. Bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) corrections have emerged as an optional processing method to soften differences in surface reflectance (SR) measurements, where the c-factor is one of the available options for this task. The c-factor efficiency is well-proven for medium spatial resolution products. However, its use should be restricted to images from sensors with a narrow view since it causes subtle changes in the processed images. There are currently a limited number of open tools for users to independently process their images. Here, we implemented the required tools to generate a Nadir BRDF-Adjusted Surface Reflectance (NBAR) product through the c-factor approach, and we evaluated them for a study area using Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 images. Several comparisons were conducted to verify the SR and NBAR differences. Initially, a single-sensor approach was adopted and later a multi-source approach. Notably, NBAR products exhibit fewer disparities compared to SR products (prior to BRDF corrections). The results reinforce that the c-factor can be used to improve time series compatibility and, most importantly, provide the tools to allow users to generate the NBAR products themselves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2023.1254242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2023.1254242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

云和云影对光学遥感的影响很大。结合不同来源的图像可以帮助获得地球表面更频繁的时间序列。然而,在组合来自多个传感器的图像之前,必须考虑和处理传感器的差异。即使经过几何校正、内部校准和带通,图像测量中的差异也会持续存在。造成这种现象的一个潜在因素是定向效应。双向反射率分布函数(BRDF)校正已成为一种可选的处理方法,用于软化表面反射率(SR)测量的差异,其中c因子是该任务的可用选项之一。c因子效率在中等空间分辨率产品中得到了很好的证明。但是,由于它会导致处理后的图像发生微妙的变化,因此应限制使用窄视图传感器的图像。目前可供用户独立处理图像的开放工具数量有限。在这里,我们使用了所需的工具,通过c因子方法生成了Nadir brdf调整表面反射率(NBAR)产品,并使用Landsat-8和Sentinel-2图像对研究区域进行了评估。我们进行了一些比较来验证SR和NBAR的差异。最初采用单传感器方法,后来采用多源方法。值得注意的是,与SR产品相比,NBAR产品表现出更少的差异(在BRDF校正之前)。结果表明,c因子可用于提高时间序列兼容性,最重要的是,它提供了允许用户自己生成NBAR产品的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A reproducible and replicable approach for harmonizing Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 images
Clouds and cloud shadows significantly impact optical remote sensing. Combining images from different sources can help to obtain more frequent time series of the Earth’s surface. Nevertheless, sensor differences must be accounted for and treated before combining images from multiple sensors. Even after geometric correction, inter-calibration, and bandpass, disparities in image measurements can persist. One potential factor contributing to this phenomenon is directional effects. Bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) corrections have emerged as an optional processing method to soften differences in surface reflectance (SR) measurements, where the c-factor is one of the available options for this task. The c-factor efficiency is well-proven for medium spatial resolution products. However, its use should be restricted to images from sensors with a narrow view since it causes subtle changes in the processed images. There are currently a limited number of open tools for users to independently process their images. Here, we implemented the required tools to generate a Nadir BRDF-Adjusted Surface Reflectance (NBAR) product through the c-factor approach, and we evaluated them for a study area using Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 images. Several comparisons were conducted to verify the SR and NBAR differences. Initially, a single-sensor approach was adopted and later a multi-source approach. Notably, NBAR products exhibit fewer disparities compared to SR products (prior to BRDF corrections). The results reinforce that the c-factor can be used to improve time series compatibility and, most importantly, provide the tools to allow users to generate the NBAR products themselves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信