一个简短的法语工具的开发和内容验证,用于癌症患者支持和姑息治疗需求的自我评估:ACCOmPAgNE工具

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
François Chaumier, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Marianne Bourdon
{"title":"一个简短的法语工具的开发和内容验证,用于癌症患者支持和姑息治疗需求的自我评估:ACCOmPAgNE工具","authors":"François Chaumier, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Marianne Bourdon","doi":"10.1155/2023/8825102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. This study aimed to develop and perform a content validation of a brief French tool for self-assessment of supportive and palliative care needs in patients with cancer, using four different approaches: issue’s importance, problem intensity, problem burden, and expressed need for help. Methods. Items, questions, and response scales were based on a literature review and discussions within a multidisciplinary scientific committee. A panel of experts evaluated the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of each item and question using the Delphi method. These properties were also assessed through cognitive debriefing interviews with cancer patients. Results. Eleven domains were selected from the literature review: physical, role, social, psychological, patient care and support, healthcare, information, financial, activities of daily living, spirituality, and sexuality. A scientific committee created 15 items and five questions. Two Delphi rounds were required to reach a consensus among the 29 experts on a pilot version. Twenty-three cancer patients were involved in the cognitive debriefing interviews. All items and questions were considered as relevant. Acceptability was good, and four items were reformulated based on patients’ comments. Conclusion. This brief French tool has a very good content validity and can be used in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Content Validation of a Brief French Tool for Self-Assessment of Supportive and Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Cancer: The ACCOmPAgNE Tool\",\"authors\":\"François Chaumier, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Marianne Bourdon\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/8825102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. This study aimed to develop and perform a content validation of a brief French tool for self-assessment of supportive and palliative care needs in patients with cancer, using four different approaches: issue’s importance, problem intensity, problem burden, and expressed need for help. Methods. Items, questions, and response scales were based on a literature review and discussions within a multidisciplinary scientific committee. A panel of experts evaluated the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of each item and question using the Delphi method. These properties were also assessed through cognitive debriefing interviews with cancer patients. Results. Eleven domains were selected from the literature review: physical, role, social, psychological, patient care and support, healthcare, information, financial, activities of daily living, spirituality, and sexuality. A scientific committee created 15 items and five questions. Two Delphi rounds were required to reach a consensus among the 29 experts on a pilot version. Twenty-three cancer patients were involved in the cognitive debriefing interviews. All items and questions were considered as relevant. Acceptability was good, and four items were reformulated based on patients’ comments. Conclusion. This brief French tool has a very good content validity and can be used in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8825102\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8825102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。本研究旨在开发和执行一个简短的法语工具的内容验证,用于癌症患者支持和姑息治疗需求的自我评估,使用四种不同的方法:问题的重要性,问题的强度,问题的负担和表达的帮助需求。方法。项目、问题和反应量表基于文献综述和多学科科学委员会的讨论。专家小组使用德尔菲法评估每个项目和问题的相关性、全面性和可理解性。这些特性也通过对癌症患者的认知汇报访谈来评估。结果。从文献综述中选择了11个领域:身体、角色、社会、心理、病人护理和支持、医疗保健、信息、财务、日常生活活动、灵性和性。一个科学委员会设计了15个项目和5个问题。29位专家需要经过两轮德尔菲讨论才能就试点版本达成共识。23名癌症患者参与了认知汇报访谈。所有项目和问题都被认为是相关的。可接受性较好,根据患者评价对4项进行了重新制定。结论。该简易法语工具具有很好的内容效度,可用于临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Content Validation of a Brief French Tool for Self-Assessment of Supportive and Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Cancer: The ACCOmPAgNE Tool
Objective. This study aimed to develop and perform a content validation of a brief French tool for self-assessment of supportive and palliative care needs in patients with cancer, using four different approaches: issue’s importance, problem intensity, problem burden, and expressed need for help. Methods. Items, questions, and response scales were based on a literature review and discussions within a multidisciplinary scientific committee. A panel of experts evaluated the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of each item and question using the Delphi method. These properties were also assessed through cognitive debriefing interviews with cancer patients. Results. Eleven domains were selected from the literature review: physical, role, social, psychological, patient care and support, healthcare, information, financial, activities of daily living, spirituality, and sexuality. A scientific committee created 15 items and five questions. Two Delphi rounds were required to reach a consensus among the 29 experts on a pilot version. Twenty-three cancer patients were involved in the cognitive debriefing interviews. All items and questions were considered as relevant. Acceptability was good, and four items were reformulated based on patients’ comments. Conclusion. This brief French tool has a very good content validity and can be used in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer Care
European Journal of Cancer Care 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of: - Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients - Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care - Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients - Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care - Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members - International perspectives on cancer care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信