大数据、数字化和新的监控实践:新的决策文化和全景分类

Elif ÖZUZ DAĞDELEN, Tuğça POYRAZ
{"title":"大数据、数字化和新的监控实践:新的决策文化和全景分类","authors":"Elif ÖZUZ DAĞDELEN, Tuğça POYRAZ","doi":"10.32600/huefd.1229239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Big data brings along a new decision-making culture through data mining aided decision-making mechanisms. One of the biggest sources of this mechanism is meta-data and that creates a suitable condition for mass-monitoring surveillance. The belief in these systems creates a discussion about usage of big data as a social classification tool, big data hubris, and big data divide. The aim of this study is to discuss the possible destructive results of big data especially as a social classification tool and new surveillance practices. In that point, this study focuses on the idea that big data paves the way to the new surveillance or dragnet surveillance practices and the possibility of social classification, and these might construct a world of increasing disadvantage. Through this panoptic sort, it comes with the problem of a serious power imbalance, simplification and decontextualization. It might result in the danger of loss of privacy and erosion of long-term privacy norms, a routine classification, manipulation of the future behaviors, antidemocratic control system, panoptic missort, data-antisubordination, abuse of civil rights and security problems.","PeriodicalId":30677,"journal":{"name":"Hacettepe Universitesi Edebiyat Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Big Data, Digitization and New Surveillance Practices: New Decision-Making Culture and Panoptic Classification\",\"authors\":\"Elif ÖZUZ DAĞDELEN, Tuğça POYRAZ\",\"doi\":\"10.32600/huefd.1229239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Big data brings along a new decision-making culture through data mining aided decision-making mechanisms. One of the biggest sources of this mechanism is meta-data and that creates a suitable condition for mass-monitoring surveillance. The belief in these systems creates a discussion about usage of big data as a social classification tool, big data hubris, and big data divide. The aim of this study is to discuss the possible destructive results of big data especially as a social classification tool and new surveillance practices. In that point, this study focuses on the idea that big data paves the way to the new surveillance or dragnet surveillance practices and the possibility of social classification, and these might construct a world of increasing disadvantage. Through this panoptic sort, it comes with the problem of a serious power imbalance, simplification and decontextualization. It might result in the danger of loss of privacy and erosion of long-term privacy norms, a routine classification, manipulation of the future behaviors, antidemocratic control system, panoptic missort, data-antisubordination, abuse of civil rights and security problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hacettepe Universitesi Edebiyat Fakultesi Dergisi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hacettepe Universitesi Edebiyat Fakultesi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.1229239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hacettepe Universitesi Edebiyat Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.1229239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大数据通过数据挖掘辅助决策机制带来了一种新的决策文化。这种机制的最大来源之一是元数据,这为大规模监控创造了合适的条件。对这些系统的信念引发了关于将大数据用作社会分类工具、大数据傲慢和大数据鸿沟的讨论。本研究的目的是讨论大数据可能带来的破坏性后果,尤其是作为一种社会分类工具和新的监控实践。在这一点上,本研究的重点是大数据为新的监视或拉网式监视实践和社会分类的可能性铺平了道路,这些可能会构建一个越来越不利的世界。通过这种全局性的分类,它带来了严重的权力失衡、简化和脱语境化的问题。它可能会导致隐私丧失和长期隐私规范侵蚀的危险,常规化的分类,对未来行为的操纵,反民主的控制系统,全景错乱,数据反从属,滥用公民权利和安全问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Big Data, Digitization and New Surveillance Practices: New Decision-Making Culture and Panoptic Classification
Big data brings along a new decision-making culture through data mining aided decision-making mechanisms. One of the biggest sources of this mechanism is meta-data and that creates a suitable condition for mass-monitoring surveillance. The belief in these systems creates a discussion about usage of big data as a social classification tool, big data hubris, and big data divide. The aim of this study is to discuss the possible destructive results of big data especially as a social classification tool and new surveillance practices. In that point, this study focuses on the idea that big data paves the way to the new surveillance or dragnet surveillance practices and the possibility of social classification, and these might construct a world of increasing disadvantage. Through this panoptic sort, it comes with the problem of a serious power imbalance, simplification and decontextualization. It might result in the danger of loss of privacy and erosion of long-term privacy norms, a routine classification, manipulation of the future behaviors, antidemocratic control system, panoptic missort, data-antisubordination, abuse of civil rights and security problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信