化学-机械、机械除龋方法在自光显微镜和体视显微镜下的效果评价与比较——体外研究

None Rohith Shinde, None Naresh Krishna Reddy, None Sri Mouna Govardhani Kottapalli, None Sahithi Nammaniwar, None Sanganand Gavle, None Pranitha Shinde
{"title":"化学-机械、机械除龋方法在自光显微镜和体视显微镜下的效果评价与比较——体外研究","authors":"None Rohith Shinde, None Naresh Krishna Reddy, None Sri Mouna Govardhani Kottapalli, None Sahithi Nammaniwar, None Sanganand Gavle, None Pranitha Shinde","doi":"10.14260/jemds.v12i9.488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND
 There are different caries removal methods including conventional rotary caries removal, atraumatic restorative therapy, air abrasion, lasers, and chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR). Chemo-mechanical caries removal is an alternative treatment for active caries, that involves the caries removal of only infected dental tissue and acts by the dissolution of carious lesions with natural or synthetic agents.
 Aim
 Comparison of chemo-mechanical material (CariSolv) and the mechanical method (Smart bur & Carbide bur) of caries removal under a self-illuminated microscope and stereomicroscope in terms of efficacy and time duration.
 METHODS
 Tooth was sectioned in 4 parts and grouped into 4 as group 1, group 2, group 3, and group 4. Each group was treated with different caries removal methods of carbide bur, smart bur, CariSolv and control group. Examined under self-illuminated and stereomicroscope at 10 different points from middle to periphery.
 RESULTS
 Carbide bur specimens have a negligible amount of affected dentin and there is a destruction of dentinal tubules when compared to the smart bur group & CariSolv group. Showing affected dentin thickness in 4 groups at 10 different positions from the middle part of the lesion to the periphery (i.e., towards CEJ & cusp tip) by using a stereomicroscope.
 CONCLUSIONS
 The CariSolv group demonstrated the presence of affected dentine higher and took twice the time to remove caries but was easy to induce and conserved the healthy tooth structure when compared to carbide and smart bur groups. Less amount of affected dentine was seen in the carbide bur group but there was a destruction of sound dentine.
","PeriodicalId":47072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and Comparison of the Efficacy of Chemo-Mechanical, Mechanical Methods of Caries Removal under Self-Illuminated Light Microscope and Stereomicroscope – An In Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"None Rohith Shinde, None Naresh Krishna Reddy, None Sri Mouna Govardhani Kottapalli, None Sahithi Nammaniwar, None Sanganand Gavle, None Pranitha Shinde\",\"doi\":\"10.14260/jemds.v12i9.488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND
 There are different caries removal methods including conventional rotary caries removal, atraumatic restorative therapy, air abrasion, lasers, and chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR). Chemo-mechanical caries removal is an alternative treatment for active caries, that involves the caries removal of only infected dental tissue and acts by the dissolution of carious lesions with natural or synthetic agents.
 Aim
 Comparison of chemo-mechanical material (CariSolv) and the mechanical method (Smart bur & Carbide bur) of caries removal under a self-illuminated microscope and stereomicroscope in terms of efficacy and time duration.
 METHODS
 Tooth was sectioned in 4 parts and grouped into 4 as group 1, group 2, group 3, and group 4. Each group was treated with different caries removal methods of carbide bur, smart bur, CariSolv and control group. Examined under self-illuminated and stereomicroscope at 10 different points from middle to periphery.
 RESULTS
 Carbide bur specimens have a negligible amount of affected dentin and there is a destruction of dentinal tubules when compared to the smart bur group & CariSolv group. Showing affected dentin thickness in 4 groups at 10 different positions from the middle part of the lesion to the periphery (i.e., towards CEJ & cusp tip) by using a stereomicroscope.
 CONCLUSIONS
 The CariSolv group demonstrated the presence of affected dentine higher and took twice the time to remove caries but was easy to induce and conserved the healthy tooth structure when compared to carbide and smart bur groups. Less amount of affected dentine was seen in the carbide bur group but there was a destruction of sound dentine.
\",\"PeriodicalId\":47072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds.v12i9.488\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds.v12i9.488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景# x0D;除龋方法有传统的旋转除龋、非创伤性修复治疗、空气磨损、激光和化学机械除龋(CMCR)等。化学-机械除龋是活动性龋齿的一种替代治疗方法,它只涉及去除受感染的牙组织,并通过使用天然或合成药物溶解龋齿病变来起作用。目标# x0D;化学机械材料(CariSolv)与机械方法(Smart bur &在自光显微镜和体视显微镜下对硬质合金的除龋效果和持续时间的研究。 方法# x0D;将牙切成4个部分,分为1组、2组、3组、4组。各组分别采用硬质合金除龋器、智能除龋器、CariSolv除龋器和对照组。在自照明和体视显微镜下检查从中部到外围的10个不同点。 结果# x0D;与智能钎组相比,硬质合金钎试件受影响的牙本质可以忽略不计,并且存在牙本质小管的破坏。CariSolv组。显示4组从病灶中部到周围(即向CEJ方向)10个不同位置受影响的牙本质厚度;尖端),使用立体显微镜。 结论# x0D;CariSolv组牙本质受影响程度较高,除龋时间是硬质合金组和智能牙组的两倍,但易于诱导并保持健康的牙齿结构。碳化物组受影响的牙本质较少,但完好的牙本质有破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation and Comparison of the Efficacy of Chemo-Mechanical, Mechanical Methods of Caries Removal under Self-Illuminated Light Microscope and Stereomicroscope – An In Vitro Study
BACKGROUND There are different caries removal methods including conventional rotary caries removal, atraumatic restorative therapy, air abrasion, lasers, and chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR). Chemo-mechanical caries removal is an alternative treatment for active caries, that involves the caries removal of only infected dental tissue and acts by the dissolution of carious lesions with natural or synthetic agents. Aim Comparison of chemo-mechanical material (CariSolv) and the mechanical method (Smart bur & Carbide bur) of caries removal under a self-illuminated microscope and stereomicroscope in terms of efficacy and time duration. METHODS Tooth was sectioned in 4 parts and grouped into 4 as group 1, group 2, group 3, and group 4. Each group was treated with different caries removal methods of carbide bur, smart bur, CariSolv and control group. Examined under self-illuminated and stereomicroscope at 10 different points from middle to periphery. RESULTS Carbide bur specimens have a negligible amount of affected dentin and there is a destruction of dentinal tubules when compared to the smart bur group & CariSolv group. Showing affected dentin thickness in 4 groups at 10 different positions from the middle part of the lesion to the periphery (i.e., towards CEJ & cusp tip) by using a stereomicroscope. CONCLUSIONS The CariSolv group demonstrated the presence of affected dentine higher and took twice the time to remove caries but was easy to induce and conserved the healthy tooth structure when compared to carbide and smart bur groups. Less amount of affected dentine was seen in the carbide bur group but there was a destruction of sound dentine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
180
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信