中央政府对亚齐自治法修正案的合宪性质疑:谁有权力?

IF 0.5 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Badri Hasan Sulaiman
{"title":"中央政府对亚齐自治法修正案的合宪性质疑:谁有权力?","authors":"Badri Hasan Sulaiman","doi":"10.26811/peuradeun.v11i2.857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article criticized the decision of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia-DPR RI) to amend several articles regarding Aceh's autonomy authorities. The DPR RI should consult the norms of Aceh's autonomy to Aceh's Parliament. Unfortunately, the DPR RI tended to consult and involve Aceh's Parliament before making decisions. Most of the decisions regarding Aceh's autonomy had been decided by the DPR RI, creating a potential conflict of regulation in the year to come and distrust between central and provincial governments. This article used a qualitative method with the black letter law approach concerning some regulations as the primary data. The author claimed that the central government had ignored the principle of checks and balances between the central dan provincial governments and also broke the principle of consultation as stated in Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Aceh Government.","PeriodicalId":56152,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questioning the Contitutionality of Amandement Aceh’s Autonomy Law by Central Government: Who has the Authority?\",\"authors\":\"Badri Hasan Sulaiman\",\"doi\":\"10.26811/peuradeun.v11i2.857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article criticized the decision of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia-DPR RI) to amend several articles regarding Aceh's autonomy authorities. The DPR RI should consult the norms of Aceh's autonomy to Aceh's Parliament. Unfortunately, the DPR RI tended to consult and involve Aceh's Parliament before making decisions. Most of the decisions regarding Aceh's autonomy had been decided by the DPR RI, creating a potential conflict of regulation in the year to come and distrust between central and provincial governments. This article used a qualitative method with the black letter law approach concerning some regulations as the primary data. The author claimed that the central government had ignored the principle of checks and balances between the central dan provincial governments and also broke the principle of consultation as stated in Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Aceh Government.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i2.857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i2.857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文批评印度尼西亚共和国众议院(Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia- dpr RI)修改有关亚齐自治当局的若干条款的决定。DPR RI应该向亚齐议会咨询亚齐自治的规范。不幸的是,DPR RI在做出决定之前倾向于咨询并让亚齐议会参与。大多数关于亚齐自治的决定都是由DPR RI决定的,这在未来一年造成了潜在的监管冲突,以及中央政府和省政府之间的不信任。本文采用定性的方法,以黑体字法的方法对部分法规进行研究,作为主要资料。提交人声称,中央政府忽视了中央和省级政府之间相互制衡的原则,也违反了2006年关于亚齐政府的第11号法律所规定的协商原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Questioning the Contitutionality of Amandement Aceh’s Autonomy Law by Central Government: Who has the Authority?
This article criticized the decision of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia-DPR RI) to amend several articles regarding Aceh's autonomy authorities. The DPR RI should consult the norms of Aceh's autonomy to Aceh's Parliament. Unfortunately, the DPR RI tended to consult and involve Aceh's Parliament before making decisions. Most of the decisions regarding Aceh's autonomy had been decided by the DPR RI, creating a potential conflict of regulation in the year to come and distrust between central and provincial governments. This article used a qualitative method with the black letter law approach concerning some regulations as the primary data. The author claimed that the central government had ignored the principle of checks and balances between the central dan provincial governments and also broke the principle of consultation as stated in Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Aceh Government.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
80.00%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信