对“平等、公平和算法:向罗莎莉·阿贝拉法官学习”的思考

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Elizabeth Shilton
{"title":"对“平等、公平和算法:向罗莎莉·阿贝拉法官学习”的思考","authors":"Elizabeth Shilton","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article responds to Martha Minow’s article ‘Equality, Equity, and Algorithms: Learning from Justice Rosalie Abella,’ from the perspective of a Canadian labour lawyer, equality rights litigator, and quondam academic. The article considers Minow’s concerns about whether algorithmic decisions are justiciable against the backdrop of Abella J’s superb synthesis of Canadian constitutional equality law in Fraser v Canada. It also comments on the extent to which the Supreme Court of Canada’s subsequent decision in R v Sharma has undermined that synthesis.","PeriodicalId":46289,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflections on ‘Equality, Equity, and Algorithms: Learning from Justice Rosalie Abella’\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Shilton\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/utlj-2023-0066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article responds to Martha Minow’s article ‘Equality, Equity, and Algorithms: Learning from Justice Rosalie Abella,’ from the perspective of a Canadian labour lawyer, equality rights litigator, and quondam academic. The article considers Minow’s concerns about whether algorithmic decisions are justiciable against the backdrop of Abella J’s superb synthesis of Canadian constitutional equality law in Fraser v Canada. It also comments on the extent to which the Supreme Court of Canada’s subsequent decision in R v Sharma has undermined that synthesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Toronto Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Toronto Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2023-0066\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2023-0066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是对Martha Minow的文章《平等、公平和算法:向Rosalie Abella法官学习》的回应,本文从加拿大劳工律师、平等权利诉讼律师和前学者的角度出发。本文考虑了Minow的担忧,即算法决定是否可在阿贝拉·J (Abella J)在弗雷泽诉加拿大(Fraser v Canada)一案中对加拿大宪法平等法的精湛综合的背景下进行审理。它还评论了加拿大最高法院随后在R v Sharma案中的裁决在多大程度上破坏了这种综合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflections on ‘Equality, Equity, and Algorithms: Learning from Justice Rosalie Abella’
This article responds to Martha Minow’s article ‘Equality, Equity, and Algorithms: Learning from Justice Rosalie Abella,’ from the perspective of a Canadian labour lawyer, equality rights litigator, and quondam academic. The article considers Minow’s concerns about whether algorithmic decisions are justiciable against the backdrop of Abella J’s superb synthesis of Canadian constitutional equality law in Fraser v Canada. It also comments on the extent to which the Supreme Court of Canada’s subsequent decision in R v Sharma has undermined that synthesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信