以环境质量为重点的欧盟项目回顾:创新、生态创新和循环经济要素

IF 4.2 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Jana Hojnik , Mitja Ruzzier , Maja Konečnik Ruzzier , Boris Sučić , Brandon Soltwisch , Matej Rus
{"title":"以环境质量为重点的欧盟项目回顾:创新、生态创新和循环经济要素","authors":"Jana Hojnik ,&nbsp;Mitja Ruzzier ,&nbsp;Maja Konečnik Ruzzier ,&nbsp;Boris Sučić ,&nbsp;Brandon Soltwisch ,&nbsp;Matej Rus","doi":"10.1016/j.ijis.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The primary objective of this study is to delve into transnational projects conducted between 2014 and 2020, with a strong emphasis on environmental quality. Our focus is directed toward projects that encompass either eco-innovation or feature elements intrinsic to a circular economy. To achieve this goal, we introduce a pioneering analytical framework tailored to dissect transnational projects, which intricately interweaves the diverse dimensions of environmental quality and innovation, facilitating a comparative assessment across various program classifications. Our approach aligns with the overarching mission of the four flagship initiatives, in which we evaluate the combined impacts on sustainability and innovation. This evaluation considers three fundamental factors: (1) resource allocation, (2) innovation type, and (3) infusion of eco-innovation or circular economy elements. Our methodology unfolds through a systematic, step-by-step progression. First, we meticulously handpick programs, specifically Interreg, Horizon, and Life projects, within the scope of TSG3 (Environmental Quality). Each of these programs corresponds to one of the following four flagship initiatives: (1) overseeing and managing marine species, (2) fostering sustainable development in coastal and maritime zones, (3) safeguarding and elevating natural habitats and terrestrial ecosystems, and (4) formulating transnational contingency strategies for maritime accidents. Through an exhaustive review, we identify projects that either directly or indirectly champion eco-innovation or other facets of the circular economy. Concurrently, we uncover broader manifestations of innovation, eco-innovation, and circular economy principles. Employing the Oslo Manual as a guide, we methodically categorize these innovations into the product, process, organizational, and marketing domains. In the timeframe under scrutiny, a relatively modest subset of projects embraced eco-innovations and practices aligned with the circular economy. Our findings culminate in the formulation of practical implications to invigorate the integration of these dimensions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36449,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"Pages 1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248723000395/pdfft?md5=75ff32be724d4cb9399c421921603437&pid=1-s2.0-S2096248723000395-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of EU projects with a focus on environmental quality: Innovation, eco-innovation, and circular-economy elements\",\"authors\":\"Jana Hojnik ,&nbsp;Mitja Ruzzier ,&nbsp;Maja Konečnik Ruzzier ,&nbsp;Boris Sučić ,&nbsp;Brandon Soltwisch ,&nbsp;Matej Rus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijis.2023.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The primary objective of this study is to delve into transnational projects conducted between 2014 and 2020, with a strong emphasis on environmental quality. Our focus is directed toward projects that encompass either eco-innovation or feature elements intrinsic to a circular economy. To achieve this goal, we introduce a pioneering analytical framework tailored to dissect transnational projects, which intricately interweaves the diverse dimensions of environmental quality and innovation, facilitating a comparative assessment across various program classifications. Our approach aligns with the overarching mission of the four flagship initiatives, in which we evaluate the combined impacts on sustainability and innovation. This evaluation considers three fundamental factors: (1) resource allocation, (2) innovation type, and (3) infusion of eco-innovation or circular economy elements. Our methodology unfolds through a systematic, step-by-step progression. First, we meticulously handpick programs, specifically Interreg, Horizon, and Life projects, within the scope of TSG3 (Environmental Quality). Each of these programs corresponds to one of the following four flagship initiatives: (1) overseeing and managing marine species, (2) fostering sustainable development in coastal and maritime zones, (3) safeguarding and elevating natural habitats and terrestrial ecosystems, and (4) formulating transnational contingency strategies for maritime accidents. Through an exhaustive review, we identify projects that either directly or indirectly champion eco-innovation or other facets of the circular economy. Concurrently, we uncover broader manifestations of innovation, eco-innovation, and circular economy principles. Employing the Oslo Manual as a guide, we methodically categorize these innovations into the product, process, organizational, and marketing domains. In the timeframe under scrutiny, a relatively modest subset of projects embraced eco-innovations and practices aligned with the circular economy. Our findings culminate in the formulation of practical implications to invigorate the integration of these dimensions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Innovation Studies\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248723000395/pdfft?md5=75ff32be724d4cb9399c421921603437&pid=1-s2.0-S2096248723000395-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Innovation Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248723000395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248723000395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是深入研究 2014 年至 2020 年期间开展的跨国项目,重点关注环境质量。我们的重点是那些包含生态创新或具有循环经济内在要素的项目。为了实现这一目标,我们引入了一个开创性的分析框架,该框架专为剖析跨国项目而量身定制,将环境质量和创新的不同维度错综复杂地交织在一起,便于对各种项目分类进行比较评估。我们的方法与四项旗舰计划的总体使命相一致,即评估对可持续性和创新的综合影响。这项评估考虑了三个基本因素:(1) 资源分配,(2) 创新类型,(3) 生态创新或循环经济元素的注入。我们的方法是通过系统的、循序渐进的方式展开的。首先,我们精心挑选 TSG3(环境质量)范围内的项目,特别是 Interreg、Horizon 和 Life 项目。每个项目都与以下四个旗舰计划之一相对应:(1) 监督和管理海洋物种,(2) 促进沿海和海洋区域的可持续发展,(3) 保护和提升自然栖息地和陆地生态系统,(4) 制定跨国海上事故应急战略。通过详尽的审查,我们确定了直接或间接支持生态创新或循环经济其他方面的项目。同时,我们还发现了创新、生态创新和循环经济原则的更广泛表现形式。以《奥斯陆手册》为指导,我们有条不紊地将这些创新分为产品、流程、组织和营销领域。在我们研究的时间范围内,有一小部分项目采用了生态创新和符合循环经济的做法。我们的研究结果最终提出了促进这些方面整合的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of EU projects with a focus on environmental quality: Innovation, eco-innovation, and circular-economy elements

The primary objective of this study is to delve into transnational projects conducted between 2014 and 2020, with a strong emphasis on environmental quality. Our focus is directed toward projects that encompass either eco-innovation or feature elements intrinsic to a circular economy. To achieve this goal, we introduce a pioneering analytical framework tailored to dissect transnational projects, which intricately interweaves the diverse dimensions of environmental quality and innovation, facilitating a comparative assessment across various program classifications. Our approach aligns with the overarching mission of the four flagship initiatives, in which we evaluate the combined impacts on sustainability and innovation. This evaluation considers three fundamental factors: (1) resource allocation, (2) innovation type, and (3) infusion of eco-innovation or circular economy elements. Our methodology unfolds through a systematic, step-by-step progression. First, we meticulously handpick programs, specifically Interreg, Horizon, and Life projects, within the scope of TSG3 (Environmental Quality). Each of these programs corresponds to one of the following four flagship initiatives: (1) overseeing and managing marine species, (2) fostering sustainable development in coastal and maritime zones, (3) safeguarding and elevating natural habitats and terrestrial ecosystems, and (4) formulating transnational contingency strategies for maritime accidents. Through an exhaustive review, we identify projects that either directly or indirectly champion eco-innovation or other facets of the circular economy. Concurrently, we uncover broader manifestations of innovation, eco-innovation, and circular economy principles. Employing the Oslo Manual as a guide, we methodically categorize these innovations into the product, process, organizational, and marketing domains. In the timeframe under scrutiny, a relatively modest subset of projects embraced eco-innovations and practices aligned with the circular economy. Our findings culminate in the formulation of practical implications to invigorate the integration of these dimensions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Innovation Studies
International Journal of Innovation Studies Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信