为假设作者辩护

IF 0.7 1区艺术学 0 ART

BRITISH JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1093/aesthj/ayac062

Szu-Yen Lin

{"title":"为假设作者辩护","authors":"Szu-Yen Lin","doi":"10.1093/aesthj/ayac062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In contemporary analytic philosophy of art, the intentionalist debate is about whether the author’s intention is relevant to the interpretation of her work. Various positions have been proposed, and in this paper I defend what I call hypothetical author-hypothetical intentionalism, the position that interpretation is based on the intention attributed to the author constructed from the work. There are three aims to achieve: (1) to give a general account of hypothetical author-hypothetical intentionalism; (2) to present a moderate version of hypothetical author-hypothetical intentionalism; (3) to defend the moderate version of hypothetical author-hypothetical intentionalism against actual intentionalism and actual author-hypothetical intentionalism. Against the current trend that focuses on actual authors, I hope to show that the hypothetical author account is still a sustainable contender in the intentionalist debate.","PeriodicalId":46609,"journal":{"name":"BRITISH JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defending the Hypothetical Author\",\"authors\":\"Szu-Yen Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aesthj/ayac062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In contemporary analytic philosophy of art, the intentionalist debate is about whether the author’s intention is relevant to the interpretation of her work. Various positions have been proposed, and in this paper I defend what I call hypothetical author-hypothetical intentionalism, the position that interpretation is based on the intention attributed to the author constructed from the work. There are three aims to achieve: (1) to give a general account of hypothetical author-hypothetical intentionalism; (2) to present a moderate version of hypothetical author-hypothetical intentionalism; (3) to defend the moderate version of hypothetical author-hypothetical intentionalism against actual intentionalism and actual author-hypothetical intentionalism. Against the current trend that focuses on actual authors, I hope to show that the hypothetical author account is still a sustainable contender in the intentionalist debate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BRITISH JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BRITISH JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayac062\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BRITISH JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayac062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在当代艺术分析哲学中，意图主义争论的焦点是作者的意图是否与其作品的解释相关。人们提出了各种各样的立场，在本文中，我捍卫我所谓的假设作者-假设意图主义，这种立场认为，解释是基于作者从作品中构建的意图。有三个目的要达到:(1)给出一个假设作者-假设意向性的一般说明;(2)提出一个温和版本的假设作者-假设意向性;(3)为假设作者-假设意图主义的温和版本辩护，以反对实际意图主义和实际作者-假设意图主义。与目前关注实际作者的趋势相反，我希望表明，假设作者的说法在意向性辩论中仍然是一个可持续的竞争者。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Defending the Hypothetical Author

Abstract In contemporary analytic philosophy of art, the intentionalist debate is about whether the author’s intention is relevant to the interpretation of her work. Various positions have been proposed, and in this paper I defend what I call hypothetical author-hypothetical intentionalism, the position that interpretation is based on the intention attributed to the author constructed from the work. There are three aims to achieve: (1) to give a general account of hypothetical author-hypothetical intentionalism; (2) to present a moderate version of hypothetical author-hypothetical intentionalism; (3) to defend the moderate version of hypothetical author-hypothetical intentionalism against actual intentionalism and actual author-hypothetical intentionalism. Against the current trend that focuses on actual authors, I hope to show that the hypothetical author account is still a sustainable contender in the intentionalist debate.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF AESTHETICS Multiple-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

37.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Founded in 1960, the British Journal of Aesthetics is highly regarded as an international forum for debate in philosophical aesthetics and the philosophy of art. The Journal is published to promote the study and discussion of philosophical questions about aesthetic experience and the arts. Appearing quarterly - in January, April, July, and October - it publishes lively and thoughtful articles on a broad range of topics from the nature of aesthetic judgement and the principles of art criticism to foundational issues concerning the visual arts, literature, music, dance, film, and architecture.