基于性能设计下不同板型结构的评价:以泗水公共工作空间为例

Dewi Pertiwi, Indra Komara, Yanisfa Septiarsilia, Dita Kamarul Fitriah
{"title":"基于性能设计下不同板型结构的评价:以泗水公共工作空间为例","authors":"Dewi Pertiwi, Indra Komara, Yanisfa Septiarsilia, Dita Kamarul Fitriah","doi":"10.21009/jpensil.v12i2.31492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improvement of the current construction of midrise to high-rise building in Surabaya relatively needs to be evaluated, especially for compact office building area, it is very challenging to have an optimal space to the structural system with facilitate a satisfactory capacity performance. This paper makes a comparative study of the effectivity of structural plate structure in the compact office building between conventional slab (M1), waffle slab (M2) and flat slab (M3). A typical 5-story reinforced concrete building structure is selected as a case study within 6 m symmetrically span for each model. The proposed method used in this study is based on empirical analysis followed by numerical evaluation using SAP2000. The step initiated by deriving an optimal alternative of various type of slab. This study aims to emphasize the benefits to the functionality of the structural system which more efficient in term of structural capacity and its performance. As the result, M1 and M3 offer a similar behaviour due to the reinforcement and design performance with high slab deformation compared to the M2. M2 present a lower slab deflection under the supported of waffle element with the result almost twice smaller than M1 and M3.","PeriodicalId":488921,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pensil","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION OF STRUCTURE USING VARIETY OF SLAB TYPE UNDER PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN: CASE STUDY COMMON WORKING SPACE IN SURABAYA\",\"authors\":\"Dewi Pertiwi, Indra Komara, Yanisfa Septiarsilia, Dita Kamarul Fitriah\",\"doi\":\"10.21009/jpensil.v12i2.31492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Improvement of the current construction of midrise to high-rise building in Surabaya relatively needs to be evaluated, especially for compact office building area, it is very challenging to have an optimal space to the structural system with facilitate a satisfactory capacity performance. This paper makes a comparative study of the effectivity of structural plate structure in the compact office building between conventional slab (M1), waffle slab (M2) and flat slab (M3). A typical 5-story reinforced concrete building structure is selected as a case study within 6 m symmetrically span for each model. The proposed method used in this study is based on empirical analysis followed by numerical evaluation using SAP2000. The step initiated by deriving an optimal alternative of various type of slab. This study aims to emphasize the benefits to the functionality of the structural system which more efficient in term of structural capacity and its performance. As the result, M1 and M3 offer a similar behaviour due to the reinforcement and design performance with high slab deformation compared to the M2. M2 present a lower slab deflection under the supported of waffle element with the result almost twice smaller than M1 and M3.\",\"PeriodicalId\":488921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pensil\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pensil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v12i2.31492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pensil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v12i2.31492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前泗水中高层建筑的建设相对需要进行改进评估,特别是对于紧凑的办公建筑面积,为结构体系提供最佳空间,以促进令人满意的容量性能是非常具有挑战性的。本文对紧凑型办公楼中传统板(M1)、华夫板(M2)和平板(M3)结构板结构的有效性进行了对比研究。选取一个典型的5层钢筋混凝土建筑结构作为案例研究,每个模型的对称跨度为6m。本文提出的方法是基于实证分析,然后使用SAP2000进行数值评价。通过推导各种类型板的最优选择方案而开始的步骤。本研究旨在强调结构系统功能的好处,即在结构容量和性能方面更有效。因此,与M2相比,M1和M3提供了类似的行为,因为加固和设计性能具有较高的板变形。M2在华夫格单元的支撑下表现出较低的板坯挠度,其结果几乎比M1和M3小2倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATION OF STRUCTURE USING VARIETY OF SLAB TYPE UNDER PERFORMANCE-BASED DESIGN: CASE STUDY COMMON WORKING SPACE IN SURABAYA
Improvement of the current construction of midrise to high-rise building in Surabaya relatively needs to be evaluated, especially for compact office building area, it is very challenging to have an optimal space to the structural system with facilitate a satisfactory capacity performance. This paper makes a comparative study of the effectivity of structural plate structure in the compact office building between conventional slab (M1), waffle slab (M2) and flat slab (M3). A typical 5-story reinforced concrete building structure is selected as a case study within 6 m symmetrically span for each model. The proposed method used in this study is based on empirical analysis followed by numerical evaluation using SAP2000. The step initiated by deriving an optimal alternative of various type of slab. This study aims to emphasize the benefits to the functionality of the structural system which more efficient in term of structural capacity and its performance. As the result, M1 and M3 offer a similar behaviour due to the reinforcement and design performance with high slab deformation compared to the M2. M2 present a lower slab deflection under the supported of waffle element with the result almost twice smaller than M1 and M3.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信