{"title":"涉及未在国家登记为个体企业家而从事创业活动的人的纠纷的程序和法律性质","authors":"Тихонов Владимир Владимирович","doi":"10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-3-86-92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses approaches to determining the jurisdiction of disputes involving persons engaged in entrepreneurial activity without state registration as individual entrepreneurs (\"self-employed\"). The author critically analyzes the arguments used by judicial authorities in motivating acts referring disputes involving the \"self-employed\" to the jurisdiction of courts of general jurisdiction.","PeriodicalId":33262,"journal":{"name":"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The procedural and legal nature of disputes involving persons engaged in entrepreneurial activity without state registration as an individual entrepreneur\",\"authors\":\"Тихонов Владимир Владимирович\",\"doi\":\"10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-3-86-92\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses approaches to determining the jurisdiction of disputes involving persons engaged in entrepreneurial activity without state registration as individual entrepreneurs (\\\"self-employed\\\"). The author critically analyzes the arguments used by judicial authorities in motivating acts referring disputes involving the \\\"self-employed\\\" to the jurisdiction of courts of general jurisdiction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-3-86-92\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2023-1-3-86-92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The procedural and legal nature of disputes involving persons engaged in entrepreneurial activity without state registration as an individual entrepreneur
The article discusses approaches to determining the jurisdiction of disputes involving persons engaged in entrepreneurial activity without state registration as individual entrepreneurs ("self-employed"). The author critically analyzes the arguments used by judicial authorities in motivating acts referring disputes involving the "self-employed" to the jurisdiction of courts of general jurisdiction.