评估医院 COVID-19 接触者及其后转为 SARS-CoV-2 感染的动态:一项多中心回顾性队列研究

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Nneoma Okeke , Luke B. Snell , Balram Rathish , Amal Hussein , William Newsholme , Damien Mack , Aodhan Breathnach , Jonathan A. Otter
{"title":"评估医院 COVID-19 接触者及其后转为 SARS-CoV-2 感染的动态:一项多中心回顾性队列研究","authors":"Nneoma Okeke ,&nbsp;Luke B. Snell ,&nbsp;Balram Rathish ,&nbsp;Amal Hussein ,&nbsp;William Newsholme ,&nbsp;Damien Mack ,&nbsp;Aodhan Breathnach ,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Otter","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigated the dynamics of COVID-19 contacts subsequent conversion to SARS-CoV-2 infection in an inpatient setting across three National Health Service (NHS) Trusts. 9.2% (476/5,156) COVID-19 contacts met inclusion criteria, were typable and tested positive for COVID-19. There was no significant difference between Omicron and non-Omicron contacts overall conversion proportions. Omicron contacts converted faster than non-Omicron contacts (median 3 days vs 4 days, <em>P</em>=0.03), and had significantly greater proportions of early conversions at day 3, 5, and 7 timepoints.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000586/pdfft?md5=53c2a97ce5d0d78e82bdd0dee09f4496&pid=1-s2.0-S2590088923000586-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the dynamics of hospital COVID-19 contacts and subsequent conversion to SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multi-centre retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Nneoma Okeke ,&nbsp;Luke B. Snell ,&nbsp;Balram Rathish ,&nbsp;Amal Hussein ,&nbsp;William Newsholme ,&nbsp;Damien Mack ,&nbsp;Aodhan Breathnach ,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Otter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We investigated the dynamics of COVID-19 contacts subsequent conversion to SARS-CoV-2 infection in an inpatient setting across three National Health Service (NHS) Trusts. 9.2% (476/5,156) COVID-19 contacts met inclusion criteria, were typable and tested positive for COVID-19. There was no significant difference between Omicron and non-Omicron contacts overall conversion proportions. Omicron contacts converted faster than non-Omicron contacts (median 3 days vs 4 days, <em>P</em>=0.03), and had significantly greater proportions of early conversions at day 3, 5, and 7 timepoints.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Prevention in Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000586/pdfft?md5=53c2a97ce5d0d78e82bdd0dee09f4496&pid=1-s2.0-S2590088923000586-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Prevention in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们调查了三个国民健康服务(NHS)托管医院住院病人中 COVID-19 接触者随后转为 SARS-CoV-2 感染的动态。9.2%(476/5,156)的 COVID-19 接触者符合纳入标准,可进行分型,且 COVID-19 检测呈阳性。欧米克隆和非欧米克隆接触者的总体转化比例没有明显差异。欧米克隆接触者的转化速度快于非欧米克隆接触者(中位数为 3 天 vs 4 天,P=0.03),而且在第 3、5 和 7 天时间点的早期转化比例明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the dynamics of hospital COVID-19 contacts and subsequent conversion to SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multi-centre retrospective cohort study

We investigated the dynamics of COVID-19 contacts subsequent conversion to SARS-CoV-2 infection in an inpatient setting across three National Health Service (NHS) Trusts. 9.2% (476/5,156) COVID-19 contacts met inclusion criteria, were typable and tested positive for COVID-19. There was no significant difference between Omicron and non-Omicron contacts overall conversion proportions. Omicron contacts converted faster than non-Omicron contacts (median 3 days vs 4 days, P=0.03), and had significantly greater proportions of early conversions at day 3, 5, and 7 timepoints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信