智慧城市发展的影响是什么?来自智慧城市影响指数的经验证据

Yirang Lim , Jurian Edelenbos , Alberto Gianoli
{"title":"智慧城市发展的影响是什么?来自智慧城市影响指数的经验证据","authors":"Yirang Lim ,&nbsp;Jurian Edelenbos ,&nbsp;Alberto Gianoli","doi":"10.1016/j.ugj.2023.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Smart cities aim to provide benefits such as economic prosperity, environmental sustainability, and high quality of life to their citizens. However, we do not have a comprehensive understanding of how and to what extent these benefits are realized. This paper aims to find empirical evidence of both positive and negative results of smart city development. Smart City Impact Index is developed with indicators in four pillars of sustainability (economic, environmental, social, and governance) and technological dimension as technology is main driver of smart cities. The index was applied to South Korean cities, which are categorized as 1) first-wave smart cities that focus on transportation and security infrastructure, 2) second-wave smart cities that emphasize comprehensive urban management, and 3) non-smart cities. The index score was calculated for the years 2008 and 2018 to compare the before and after of smart city development. The results showed that the second-wave smart cities scored highest in both 2008 and 2018. However, the second-wave smart city had a lower score in both the environment and social dimensions. Smart city development in South Korea has had positive impacts on facilitating equality and citizen participation but negative impacts on people's perceptions of transparency and privacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101266,"journal":{"name":"Urban Governance","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 47-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328623001079/pdfft?md5=7fb83ed1dd0a2976933a9f81fe29abfd&pid=1-s2.0-S2664328623001079-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the impact of smart city development? Empirical evidence from a Smart City Impact Index\",\"authors\":\"Yirang Lim ,&nbsp;Jurian Edelenbos ,&nbsp;Alberto Gianoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ugj.2023.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Smart cities aim to provide benefits such as economic prosperity, environmental sustainability, and high quality of life to their citizens. However, we do not have a comprehensive understanding of how and to what extent these benefits are realized. This paper aims to find empirical evidence of both positive and negative results of smart city development. Smart City Impact Index is developed with indicators in four pillars of sustainability (economic, environmental, social, and governance) and technological dimension as technology is main driver of smart cities. The index was applied to South Korean cities, which are categorized as 1) first-wave smart cities that focus on transportation and security infrastructure, 2) second-wave smart cities that emphasize comprehensive urban management, and 3) non-smart cities. The index score was calculated for the years 2008 and 2018 to compare the before and after of smart city development. The results showed that the second-wave smart cities scored highest in both 2008 and 2018. However, the second-wave smart city had a lower score in both the environment and social dimensions. Smart city development in South Korea has had positive impacts on facilitating equality and citizen participation but negative impacts on people's perceptions of transparency and privacy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Governance\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 47-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328623001079/pdfft?md5=7fb83ed1dd0a2976933a9f81fe29abfd&pid=1-s2.0-S2664328623001079-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328623001079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328623001079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智慧城市旨在为市民带来经济繁荣、环境可持续发展和高品质生活等益处。然而,我们对如何以及在多大程度上实现这些益处并没有全面的了解。本文旨在寻找智慧城市发展的积极和消极结果的实证证据。由于技术是智能城市发展的主要驱动力,因此本文从可持续发展的四个支柱(经济、环境、社会和治理)和技术维度制定了智能城市影响指数。该指数适用于韩国的城市,这些城市被分为:1)第一波智慧城市,侧重于交通和安全基础设施;2)第二波智慧城市,强调城市综合管理;3)非智慧城市。通过计算 2008 年和 2018 年的指数得分,对智慧城市发展的前后进行比较。结果显示,2008 年和 2018 年,第二波智慧城市得分最高。然而,第二波智慧城市在环境和社会两个维度的得分都较低。韩国的智慧城市发展对促进平等和公民参与产生了积极影响,但对人们对透明度和隐私的看法产生了负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is the impact of smart city development? Empirical evidence from a Smart City Impact Index

Smart cities aim to provide benefits such as economic prosperity, environmental sustainability, and high quality of life to their citizens. However, we do not have a comprehensive understanding of how and to what extent these benefits are realized. This paper aims to find empirical evidence of both positive and negative results of smart city development. Smart City Impact Index is developed with indicators in four pillars of sustainability (economic, environmental, social, and governance) and technological dimension as technology is main driver of smart cities. The index was applied to South Korean cities, which are categorized as 1) first-wave smart cities that focus on transportation and security infrastructure, 2) second-wave smart cities that emphasize comprehensive urban management, and 3) non-smart cities. The index score was calculated for the years 2008 and 2018 to compare the before and after of smart city development. The results showed that the second-wave smart cities scored highest in both 2008 and 2018. However, the second-wave smart city had a lower score in both the environment and social dimensions. Smart city development in South Korea has had positive impacts on facilitating equality and citizen participation but negative impacts on people's perceptions of transparency and privacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信